Diane Gaskill wrote:
> Reminds me of the job posting on the list a while back that said somthing
> about working with your piers.
Are you sure that this wasn't a sails position?
>
> The rest is available on request.
All these pun-ishing responses are exhausting. I'd like to
request that rest,
Diane Gaskill wrote:
Reminds me of the job posting on the list a while back that said somthing
about working with your piers.
Are you sure that this wasn't a sails position?
The rest is available on request.
All these pun-ishing responses are exhausting. I'd like to
request that rest, now
n
Behalf Of Stuart Rogers
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 1:12 PM
Cc: Framers List; framers at lists.frameusers.com
Subject: surreptitious mountains
OK, this is really getting to be fingernails on a chalkboard -- at least
5 occurrences from at least 3 contributors, of "sneak peaks".
Unl
s@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: surreptitious mountains
OK, this is really getting to be fingernails on a chalkboard -- at least
5 occurrences from at least 3 contributors, of "sneak peaks".
Unless we're talking stealthy hilltops here, it's peeks, not peaks, please!!
--
Stuar
OK, this is really getting to be fingernails on a chalkboard -- at least
5 occurrences from at least 3 contributors, of "sneak peaks".
Unless we're talking stealthy hilltops here, it's peeks, not peaks, please!!
--
Stuart Rogers
Technical Communicator
Phoenix Geophysics Limited
Toronto, ON, C
amers-bounces+cmartinek=zebra@lists.frameusers.com
[mailto:framers-bounces+cmartinek=zebra.com at lists.frameusers.com] On
Behalf Of Stuart Rogers
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 3:12 PM
Cc: Framers List; framers at lists.frameusers.com
Subject: surreptitious mountains
OK, this is really getting
Stuart Rogers wrote:
> OK, this is really getting to be fingernails on a chalkboard -- at least
> 5 occurrences from at least 3 contributors, of "sneak peaks".
>
> Unless we're talking stealthy hilltops here, it's peeks, not peaks,
> please!!
Stuart:
It seems that peeking at peaks piques you.
s.com
Subject: RE: surreptitious mountains
Egads, did I do that??? And I'm the Editor for our group...
I blame it on jet lag -- oh, wait, I never left the Central time zone.
OK, I fall back on my original claim of informtion overload. My brain
is too full and its leeking. ;-
tinek, Carla
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 1:30 PM
To: Stuart Rogers
Cc: Framers List; framers at lists.frameusers.com
Subject: RE: surreptitious mountains
Egads, did I do that??? And I'm the Editor for our group...
I blame it on jet lag -- oh, wait, I never left the Central time zone.
OK, I fall
EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Stuart Rogers
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 3:12 PM
Cc: Framers List; framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: surreptitious mountains
OK, this is really getting to be fingernails on a chalkboard -- at least
5 occurrences from at least 3 contributor
Stuart Rogers wrote:
OK, this is really getting to be fingernails on a chalkboard -- at least
5 occurrences from at least 3 contributors, of "sneak peaks".
Unless we're talking stealthy hilltops here, it's peeks, not peaks,
please!!
Stuart:
It seems that peeking at peaks piques you. Next ti
OK, this is really getting to be fingernails on a chalkboard -- at least
5 occurrences from at least 3 contributors, of "sneak peaks".
Unless we're talking stealthy hilltops here, it's peeks, not peaks, please!!
--
Stuart Rogers
Technical Communicator
Phoenix Geophysics Limited
Toronto, ON, C
12 matches
Mail list logo
