David Glick wrote:
[..]
An unofficial +0.5 from me, which will increment to +1 if the
following question is addressed:
Why is a calendar support mixin used, instead of adapting to
ICalendarSupport?
My guess would be that this is history.
Left over from the old days ;-)
Of course you are r
Tom Lazar wrote:
thanks stve for the concise write up. this kind of stuff (i.e. putting
consensus into written form) is very important imho. personally, i
think your write up (and the decisions we reached during the meeting)
strike a very good balance between being too formal and thus
restrict
thanks stve for the concise write up. this kind of stuff (i.e. putting
consensus into written form) is very important imho. personally, i
think your write up (and the decisions we reached during the meeting)
strike a very good balance between being too formal and thus
restricting on the one
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 9:51 AM, David Glick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Oct 19, 2008, at 10:55 PM, Alexander Limi wrote:
>
>> Hi Framework Team,
>>
>> On behalf of Andreas Zeidler, I'd like to offer up the following PLIP for
>> your consideration for Plone 3.3:
>>
>> http://plone.org/product
On Oct 19, 2008, at 10:55 PM, Alexander Limi wrote:
Hi Framework Team,
On behalf of Andreas Zeidler, I'd like to offer up the following
PLIP for your consideration for Plone 3.3:
http://plone.org/products/plone/roadmap/246
It's a pretty trivial PLIP that adds a new view that is capable of
Thank you Steve. I think this covers what I remembered as well. Good
work.
Danny
On 20 okt 2008, at 00:20, Steve McMahon wrote:
Here are my notes from the DC Framework Team meeting. Please discuss
anything I've missed, gotten wrong, or stated too absolutely. We'll
eventually codify the c
