On Dec 28, 2008, at 5:37 PM, Martijn Pieters wrote:
On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 23:19, David Glick
wrote:
I am definitely interested in seeing more work on filling out the
holes in
GS support in core Plone.
If we include a tool for dump-and-reload content migration in Plone
itself,
I think i
On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 23:19, David Glick wrote:
> I am definitely interested in seeing more work on filling out the holes in
> GS support in core Plone.
>
> If we include a tool for dump-and-reload content migration in Plone itself,
> I think it needs to be pluggable enough to be useful with non
Hi Alex,
Yup, the idea is to make AT *optional* (but still default), and to be able
to supply a Dexterity-based alternative. Then we can work on the migration
story from AT->Dexterity without that being a blocker for 4.0.
In other words, if you start a new project, you'll probably want to l
On 27.12.2008, at 23:28, Alexander Limi wrote:
On Sat, 27 Dec 2008 09:56:23 -0800, Ross Patterson
wrote:
One way to keep these cross-checks lightweight might be to start
with a
statement of impact. There are code changes, for example, that
have no
UI impact. In such cases, it would be
