Martin Aspeli wrote:
Hi,
Why on earth is Products.NuPlone not in the Plone 3.2 egg?
Is this in purpose or just a gross oversight?
Ok, I've released Products.NuPlone 1.0b3.
This one should be compatible with 3.2. You can use it straight away by
adding Products.NuPlone to your eggs.
The que
Martin Aspeli wrote:
I've just finished the base implementation of PLIP #239, adapterise the
ExtensibleIndexableObjectWrapper, for your review.
A review buildout can now be found here:
https://svn.plone.org/svn/plone/review/plip239-indexer
Cheers,
Martin
--
Author of `Professional Plone De
Martin Aspeli wrote:
> Martin Aspeli wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Why on earth is Products.NuPlone not in the Plone 3.2 egg?
>>
>> Is this in purpose or just a gross oversight?
>
> Ok, I've released Products.NuPlone 1.0b3.
>
> This one should be compatible with 3.2. You can use it straight away by
> addin
> +1. Plone 3 ships with NuPlone in the same way it does with CMFEditions
> or any other package, we shouldn't change this in the 3.x series.
+1 Nothing should break on a 3.x upgrade unless we've thought it
through carefully and intend to break it.
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Hanno Schlicht
PLIP 126 (Link type should automatically redirect when accessed
directly) has been implemented. You can get the review buildout from:
http://svn.plone.org/svn/plone/review/plip126-link-redirects
I'm going to paste the contents of http://svn.plone.org/svn/plone/review/plip126-link-redirects/PLI
...
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 4:37 PM, David Glick wrote:
>
> - Added basic functional test coverage to types configlet. Just because
> it was non-existent.
>
>
I'd also add that regardless of the decision made regarding this plip, I'll
be watching for the decision made and can make sure that th
