On 23. aug. 2010, at 16:09, Laurence Rowe wrote:
> I've added downloading multiple files as a zip archive to the proposal.
>
> Laurence
Isn't that really something completely different than mass uploading?
Separate plip?
--
Geir Bækholt
www.jarn.com/baekholt
From phone. Please excuse brevi
There is a step missing here: contributors must not only have signed
the agreement, they must explicitly allow that specific code to be
donated to the foundation. Signing the contributor agreement does
not mean all your code can be moved at will to the foundation.
Wichert.
Yes, of cou
On 27. juli. 2009, at 22.12, Jon Stahl wrote:
Absolutely. Getting the code into the Foundation's long-term
conservancy is very much worth doing if it's not too terribly hard.
I've not been through the process before of moving Collective code to
the Foundation, but I know Jarn has done this, so
I am on my way to vacation with my family, and cannot do anything
until Monday at the earliest.
I have discussed the search results improvements with Laurens before
he submitted his, and the two plips are accidental. They are 95% the
same plip. I'll coordinate and make sure there will not be
On Dec 23, 2007, at 01:31 , Martin Aspeli wrote:
The PLIP also mentions a better RSS portlet. I won't be able to do
that, but rumour is that Wichert has done it in the "feedmixer"
portlet already. Is that correct? If not, do we have any other
volunteers?
Feedmixer is a better RSS portle
