ficult to explain to customers and
even to new developers. Now with "3.x only change minor and upgrades are
simple" statement all are very happy!
The current plan to name it 4.0 is in my opinion very good, even if the
changes are not that major than first planned.
just my 0,02
rd.
A big +1. Perfect! Thanks Hanno for pushing this forward!
Jens
--
Jens W. Klein - Klein & Partner KEG - BlueDynamics Alliance
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
Am Tue, 05 May 2009 22:08:14 +0800 schrieb Martin Aspeli:
> Jens W. Klein wrote:
>
>> I just can say here: I agree to delay features and make the next major
>> 4.0 and not 3.5. Dont make the same mistakes again (looking at 2.5).
>
> Who said anything about delaying f
ngly about.
I just can say here: I agree to delay features and make the next major
4.0 and not 3.5. Dont make the same mistakes again (looking at 2.5).
regards Jens
--
Jens W. Klein - Klein & Partner KEG - BlueDynamics Alliance
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
In your PLIPs you wrote i.e. here https://dev.plone.org/plone/ticket/8593
to remove parts out of "Plone the Product". I fully agree to remove
features from the core!
But I think if we do so, there should be a set of "Managed Plone
Products". Important add-ons like LinguaPlone or the removed pa
Am Tue, 16 Dec 2008 09:37:50 -0800 schrieb Steve McMahon:
> The Plone 4 Framework Team has been selected. Congratulations to:
> Matthew Wilkes, David Glick, Calvin Hendryx-Parker, Laurence Rowe,
> Martijn Pieters, Erik Rose, and Ross Patterson. As anyone who's been
> following Plone development wi
I'd like to nominate myself for the 4x framework team. I think I know
plones code in-depth. Also I know the community well (since 2004) and
also know how community works. I've been release-manager of Archetypes,
contributed a bunch of code to the whole stack.
I'am a pragmatic person: I would l
