I'm not sure there is any benefit to having a separation of powers
here. I would argue that the overlap in purpose actually makes
sense(and due to that, there is a high probability that a FWT member may
be a release manager).
Having the RM on the FWT may not be a necessity, but having the RM
On 8/9/06, Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Previously Martin Aspeli wrote:
> Now that Wichert has been officially selected as release manager (and I
> whole-heartedly endorse that decision, he is a great choice), I'm wondering
> what that means for us.
The fact that I'm supposed to b
Previously Martin Aspeli wrote:
> Now that Wichert has been officially selected as release manager (and I
> whole-heartedly endorse that decision, he is a great choice), I'm wondering
> what that means for us.
The fact that I'm supposed to be one of the people advising me is a bit
odd. This makes
Hi guys,Now that Wichert has been officially selected as release manager (and I whole-heartedly endorse that decision, he is a great choice), I'm wondering what that means for us.If I understand the process correctly the Framework Teams hould have an odd number of members (so that we can achieve a
