Re: [Framework-Team] PLIP #240 ready for review

2009-01-31 Thread Andreas Zeidler
On Jan 17, 2009, at 12:04 AM, Andrew Burkhalter wrote: PLIP 240 (Improve locking configurability) has been implemented. You can get the review buildout from: https://svn.plone.org/svn/plone/review/plip240-locking-improvements/ i've added my review notes in http://dev.plone.org/plone/changeset/

Re: [Framework-Team] PLIP #240 ready for review

2009-01-28 Thread Raphael Ritz
Erik Rose wrote: I actually first implemented it exactly that way (even called it IRefreshableLockable), then wondered if the complexity was worth it. I can go either way, but would like to hear some other opinions of best practice in a case like this. For what a non-3.x-FWT opinion is worth

Re: [Framework-Team] PLIP #240 ready for review

2009-01-27 Thread Danny Bloemendaal
Ok, I reviewed this plip and did some tests with ttw locking and indeed it seems to work. I leave all the technical review stuff to people with brains. I have a remark for the help text below "Enable locking for through- the-web edits" though. I think that the line "Disabling locking here wi

Re: [Framework-Team] PLIP #240 ready for review

2009-01-27 Thread Martijn Pieters
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 18:12, Erik Rose wrote: >> I actually first implemented it exactly that way (even called it >> IRefreshableLockable), then wondered if the complexity was worth it. I can >> go either way, but would like to hear some other opinions of best practice >> in a case like this. >

Re: [Framework-Team] PLIP #240 ready for review

2009-01-27 Thread Erik Rose
I actually first implemented it exactly that way (even called it IRefreshableLockable), then wondered if the complexity was worth it. I can go either way, but would like to hear some other opinions of best practice in a case like this. For what a non-3.x-FWT opinion is worth, I'd rather pr

Re: [Framework-Team] PLIP #240 ready for review

2009-01-25 Thread David Glick
On Jan 25, 2009, at 4:09 AM, Martijn Pieters wrote: On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 00:04, Andrew Burkhalter wrote: PLIP 240 (Improve locking configurability) has been implemented. You can get the review buildout from: https://svn.plone.org/svn/plone/review/plip240-locking-improvements/ This PLIP g

Re: [Framework-Team] PLIP #240 ready for review

2009-01-25 Thread Martijn Pieters
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 00:04, Andrew Burkhalter wrote: > PLIP 240 (Improve locking configurability) has been implemented. You > can get the review buildout from: > https://svn.plone.org/svn/plone/review/plip240-locking-improvements/ This PLIP gets a +1 from me. I've looked at the code changes

Re: [Framework-Team] PLIP #240 ready for review

2009-01-20 Thread Raphael Ritz
David Glick wrote: [..] Hey, just wanted to note that Andrew and I investigated this, discovered it was due to a previously existing bug in the unlockOnFormUnload.js script, and implemented a fix in the branch for PLIP #240. In the process we also discovered a related bug which results in it

Re: [Framework-Team] PLIP #240 ready for review

2009-01-20 Thread David Glick
On Jan 16, 2009, at 3:04 PM, Andrew Burkhalter wrote: Other - There is a weird edge case in the following scenario: 1. Manager turns off locking. 2. User A starts editing a document 3. Manager turns locking back on 4. User A clicks the edit tab again 5. User B views the document The docum

[Framework-Team] PLIP #240 ready for review

2009-01-16 Thread Andrew Burkhalter
PLIP 240 (Improve locking configurability) has been implemented. You can get the review buildout from: https://svn.plone.org/svn/plone/review/plip240-locking-improvements/ I'm going to paste the contents of https://svn.plone.org/svn/plone/review/plip240-locking-improvements/PLIP_240_README.txt be