Re: [Framework-Team] Re: Death to the roadmap page?

2009-09-29 Thread Alexander Limi
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 7:34 PM, Eric Steele wrote: > Alex and I will be doing a bit of sprinting on Friday to get this up to > snuff. Personally, I'm all in favor of having some of the marketing folks > have a go at what we come up with -- I'm told I'm not a particularly sunny > individual. > I

Re: [Framework-Team] Re: Death to the roadmap page?

2009-09-28 Thread Eric Steele
On Sep 28, 2009, at 2:51 AM, Alexander Limi wrote: On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:29:08 -0700, Steve McMahon wrote: Unfortunately, the situation is *much worse* than Marie indicates, as the roadmap page is completely obsolete and outdated since we switched to trac. It's more than a bit embarras

Re: [Framework-Team] Re: Death to the roadmap page?

2009-09-28 Thread Alexander Limi
I definitely agree, but at the moment we don't do a particularly good job at covering our basic needs on the marketing front — and the roadmap isn't the most important part of what we do for marketing. The stuff outlined in the marketing plan (standardized marketing/conference material, feature com

Re: [Framework-Team] Re: Death to the roadmap page?

2009-09-28 Thread Nate Aune
I think pointing newbies to the list of PLIPs is not a wise move from a marketing standpoint. You can certainly have the link to the PLIP page from the roadmap page, but I think there needs to be a more accessible and human friendly page showing what's coming in Plone 4/5. The list of PLIPs will ju

[Framework-Team] Re: Death to the roadmap page?

2009-09-27 Thread Alexander Limi
On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:29:08 -0700, Steve McMahon wrote: Unfortunately, the situation is *much worse* than Marie indicates, as the roadmap page is completely obsolete and outdated since we switched to trac. It's more than a bit embarrassing that we link to it from the home page. We should