Re: [Framework-Team] Re: PLIP 177 - Content indexing

2007-08-19 Thread Andreas Jung
--On 17. August 2007 13:10:25 + "Andrzej (nickSamotnik)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: * When using TextIndexNG3 for indexing ExternalSiteCatalog the HTML code is not removed; this indicates a serius archietcture error, probably in ExternalSiteCatalog. There should be a standard of compone

[Framework-Team] Re: PLIP 177 - Content indexing

2007-08-17 Thread nickSamotnik
Kapil Thangavelu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Kapil Thangavelu wrote: > >> On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 08:55:07 -0500, Rocky Burt > >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >>> On Mon, 2006-11-12 at 13:43 +, Martin Aspeli wrote: > >>> Personally I think this plip would be awesome to get in place.

Re: Fwd: [Framework-Team] Re: PLIP 177 - Content indexing

2006-12-11 Thread Sidnei da Silva
On 12/11/06, Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Previously Sidnei da Silva wrote: > So we need to fix that. We can surely provide a 'stream' adapter for > FileField. We should be able to change the transform API to make use > of streams. For 3.5 I'ld love to see a whole new transform in

Re: Fwd: [Framework-Team] Re: PLIP 177 - Content indexing

2006-12-11 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Previously Sidnei da Silva wrote: > So we need to fix that. We can surely provide a 'stream' adapter for > FileField. We should be able to change the transform API to make use > of streams. For 3.5 I'ld love to see a whole new transform infrastructure :) Wichert. -- Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PRO

Re: Fwd: [Framework-Team] Re: PLIP 177 - Content indexing

2006-12-11 Thread Sidnei da Silva
On 12/11/06, Kapil Thangavelu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am seriously concerned about the str(content) part. We have improved > a lot the situation in other places in AT and it should not do that > anywere else anymore (except in the transforms maybe). We need to > fight that will all our for

Re: Fwd: [Framework-Team] Re: PLIP 177 - Content indexing

2006-12-11 Thread Kapil Thangavelu
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 10:08:40 -0500, Sidnei da Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: -- Forwarded message -- From: Sidnei da Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Dec 11, 2006 11:58 AM Subject: Re: [Framework-Team] Re: PLIP 177 - Content indexing To: Rocky Burt <[

Re: [Framework-Team] Re: PLIP 177 - Content indexing

2006-12-11 Thread Kapil Thangavelu
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 09:38:39 -0500, Daniel Nouri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Kapil Thangavelu wrote: On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 08:55:07 -0500, Rocky Burt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Mon, 2006-11-12 at 13:43 +, Martin Aspeli wrote: Do people have opinions on this: http://plone.org/products/

Fwd: [Framework-Team] Re: PLIP 177 - Content indexing

2006-12-11 Thread Sidnei da Silva
Ops, sent only to Rocky. -- Forwarded message -- From: Sidnei da Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Dec 11, 2006 11:58 AM Subject: Re: [Framework-Team] Re: PLIP 177 - Content indexing To: Rocky Burt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Personally I think this plip would be awesome to

[Framework-Team] Re: PLIP 177 - Content indexing

2006-12-11 Thread Daniel Nouri
Kapil Thangavelu wrote: > On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 08:55:07 -0500, Rocky Burt > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Mon, 2006-11-12 at 13:43 +, Martin Aspeli wrote: >>> Do people have opinions on this: >>> >>> http://plone.org/products/plone/roadmap/177 >>> >>> It seems to be a very trivial patch to

Re: [Framework-Team] Re: PLIP 177 - Content indexing

2006-12-11 Thread Kapil Thangavelu
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 08:55:07 -0500, Rocky Burt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Mon, 2006-11-12 at 13:43 +, Martin Aspeli wrote: Do people have opinions on this: http://plone.org/products/plone/roadmap/177 It seems to be a very trivial patch to AT, and it could be really useful, but I don't

[Framework-Team] Re: PLIP 177 - Content indexing

2006-12-11 Thread Rocky Burt
On Mon, 2006-11-12 at 13:43 +, Martin Aspeli wrote: > Do people have opinions on this: > > http://plone.org/products/plone/roadmap/177 > > It seems to be a very trivial patch to AT, and it could be really > useful, but I don't know about the implications for installers and how > bad the perfo