if any of my previous conferences and sprints are an indicator, i just
*know* that i won't be doing any actual fwt review work while in DC.
but that's not important. review work is 'fleissarbeit' to use a nice
german term here and can easily be done alone, whenever one can find
some time.
Previously Tom Lazar wrote:
if any of my previous conferences and sprints are an indicator, i just
*know* that i won't be doing any actual fwt review work while in DC.
but that's not important. review work is 'fleissarbeit' to use a nice
german term here and can easily be done alone,
On Sep 7, 2008, at 11:42 PM, Martin Aspeli wrote:
Personally, I'm leaning slightly in the direction of waiting for
PLIP submissions until after the conference. There'll be several
talks about and opportunities to discuss ways to improve Plone. If
someone has a good idea and wants to PLIP it
On Sun, 07 Sep 2008 03:34:58 -0700, Martin Aspeli
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's a good idea. On the other hand, I wonder if it would be nice to
give people a chance to come up with and work on PLIPs during the
post-conference sprint. In the past, we've seen a spike in PLIPs around
sprints
Hi Wichert,
We also need to determine what we do with existing eggs that have
dodgy/missing dependencies, and whether or not we can make
plone.recipe.plone optional (or just a dumb wrapper around zc.recipe.egg).
We already have some suggestions and discussion on that and I have a
local git
