On Tue, 2006-02-05 at 11:25 -0700, Rob Miller wrote:
> On May 2, 2006, at 5:27 AM, Daniel Nouri wrote:
> > However, having src/ is really a matter of taste.
>
> ah, okay, well in that case i'd argue for 'plone' instead of 'src'.
> i could live with it as it's described above, so if there are go
On Mon, 2006-01-05 at 19:20 -0700, Rob Miller wrote:
> On May 1, 2006, at 4:19 PM, Rocky Burt wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2006-02-05 at 01:08 +0200, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
> >> To summarize some of the discussion we had on IRC just now, here
> >> is our
> >> current idea, for all those people not spe
On Tue, 02 May 2006 03:20:35 +0100, Rob Miller
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
i'm okay with most of this, except for the extra 'plone' level in the
src tree. it's implied in the plone.contextualhelp directory name, IMO,
no need for an empty, duplicate folder level.
Except it enables you to c
