The G3 takes some time to get use and perfect but I've used both the G3 and the
Lomo and I actually prefer the G3 and have near perfect results every time with
both colour and bw film. I only process as a negative though so less time in
the tank. Don't give up on the G3!
Roger
Sent from
I also am not a fan of the G3. If you use a dilute developer with a long
developing time they are more consistent but then again you scratch your
film up more in the process. You can have it one way or the other...
--scott
___
FrameWorks mailing list
Thanks everyone for the great info!
Rob
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Rob Christopher random...@gmail.com wrote:
Greetings,
I am about to finish a feature film digitally that was originally shot on
16mm, and would like to create a 16mm film out print from my final digital
file. (The
Fotokem
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 8:21 AM, Pip Chodorov framewo...@re-voir.com wrote:
I got very good quality 16mm film outs from Metropolis in New York.
You can email Jack Rizzo for a price quote metroj...@hotmail.com.
- Pip Chodorov
At 9:30 -0500 6/05/15, Rob Christopher wrote:
Is anyone
Hi-
Just listed 400' cans of 250 and 500
http://www.ebay.com/itm/141658548743?ssPageName=STRK:MESELX:IT_trksid=p3984.m1555.l2649
http://www.ebay.com/itm/141658556219?ssPageName=STRK:MESELX:IT_trksid=p3984.m1555.l2649
Thanks!
___
FrameWorks mailing
I got very good quality 16mm film outs from Metropolis in New York.
You can email Jack Rizzo for a price quote metroj...@hotmail.com.
- Pip Chodorov
At 9:30 -0500 6/05/15, Rob Christopher wrote:
Is anyone capable of doing this anymore? Fotokem only does 35mm
workflow now. The finished movie is
