Hi Everyone,
Are you all aware that Mac the Ripper was rereleased and rebuilt from the
ground up in early January of this year? Its available for $40 and
supports 10.6.5 or older. Its a complicated process to buy it and then
get the copy removal code from the forum, but this new version works j
Oh!
That's a great idea Todd!
Thanks for sending out the great idea.
Deco
On 2/12/15 4:26 PM, "todd eacrett" wrote:
>
Another option is to make a single, double-wide quicktime file and run
the
> output through a Matrox DualHead to split it into two.
On Thu, 12 Feb 2015
> 13:55:03 -0600,
FCP may or may not work... But using the BlackMagic Media Express capture
software that came with the device will work for sure.You can capture it
as a Quicktime and then open it in FCP after.
Deco
On 12/29/14 3:01 PM, "Gene Youngblood" wrote:
> Friends,
I¹m taking an HDMI signal out of m
Hi Gene,
I believe the one Warren suggested is the same as you are doing (output to a
monitor) you want the ³recorder version² which is here:
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/892453-REG/Blackmagic_Design_bdlkulsdz
minrec_Ultrastudio_Mini_Recorder.html
Best,
Deco
On 12/17/14 11:32 AM
Hi Gene,
The HDMI to Thunderbolt adapter is an output not an input device.For
importing HDMI via thunderbolt, check out some of the blackmagic products,
like https://www.blackmagicdesign.com/ca/products
There are external cards like the BlackMagic Intensity line, or their
complex Ultra Studi
Bart,
I would say the following:
Will the filmmaker feel the film has an unfair chance at you festival?
Yes, they may feel that. You in fact will want to see the finished
film, it is a film you already know about and are interested in.
- so yes it does increase the filmmaker¹s
Hi Shane,
Well, the first thing you could consider, is that no matter where you send
it, seeing how it is an external drive, they are going to open up that case
and take out the drive.
They will put the drive into one of their own machines... And it may power
up and be fine. At which point they
Hi Kevin,
I would use ProRES HQ. Although the source material is in DV, you will
find, surprisingly enough, that although ProRES can¹t ³improve² the image
that is already there, it actually does make the image look better, by not
requiring it to be compressed over and over and over again on all
Why use a potter¹s wheel when you can get something manufactured out of
plastic?
Film will be for the potters, and video will be for the plastics of the
commercial industry.
On 11/16/11 7:38 PM, "Adam R. Levine" wrote:
>>
>> In a message dated 11/16/2011 20:26:01 -0500 (EST)
>> carli...@aol.c
Okay, perhaps this might add a bit more perspective.
I doesn't matter how many stops video or film may have. It doesn't matter
how indistinguishable the two may "look" (I assume as a digital file on a
computer, or monitor not projected on their intended format in a theatre).
What we are looking
I think Tim was confused and didn¹t realize that you always have your links
as part of your digital signature and that the links don¹t have anything to
do with your post and are not related to ³making film.²
On 10/7/11 1:04 PM, "Matt Helme" wrote:
> I meant you could always make film.Not su
11 matches
Mail list logo
