Re: [Frameworks] Developers

2013-06-29 Thread Scott Dorsey
I don't know, I always made all that stuff up from reagents which is a lot cheaper and more flexible. Photographer's Formulary should sell you all of the needed materials (although some thing like sulfite and borax are cheaper to get elsewhere). --scott

Re: [Frameworks] Developers

2013-06-29 Thread Dicky
Kodak apparently recently discontinued D-19 (according to the folks at Freestyle). Photographer's Formulary makes a replacement for it, but it comes only in a size to mix 1L (as opposed to 3.8L) and costs about $14 a pack (as opposed to about $20 average for the Kodak). On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 4:3

Re: [Frameworks] Developers

2013-06-29 Thread Scott Dorsey
Mr. Woods has it right. What you want is a developer that will quickly develop to a very high gamma, without a lot of grain. You can in fact use D-76 but your developing time will be very long in order to get the gamma up and it will take some tinkering. You can use dektol, but the grain will be

Re: [Frameworks] Developers

2013-06-29 Thread John Woods
oking. I personally prefer D-19 but everyone has preference. Try asking the film gurus on the APUG forums for more opinions. John From: Jarrett Hayman To: Experimental Film Discussion List Sent: Saturday, June 29, 2013 9:45:21 AM Subject: [Frameworks] Developers

Re: [Frameworks] Developers

2013-06-29 Thread Pip Chodorov
Many developers work. At L'Abominable we use D96 and D97. I have also used Dektol for high-contrast. Some people develop in coffee... if you look back at the list archives you'll find all kinds of information. There are dozens of options, you just have to experiment to get them right. Pip At 1

[Frameworks] Developers

2013-06-29 Thread Jarrett Hayman
Hello, Is it necessary to use d-19 developer for Kodak Tri-X super 8? Are there alternative developers that would as well/differently? Thanks, -JH ___ FrameWorks mailing list FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/