In the behind the scenes video for shooting 'one small step', which they claim
to have shot with the prototype, you can see that their shooting with a
Prosilica GX2300 machine vision camera.
http://www.alliedvisiontec.com/uploads/pics/Prosilica-GX.jpg
and from their BTS video, though there
ew
-Original Message- From: Christian Bruno <honeyhou...@hotmail.com>Sent: Mar 13, 2012 12:16 PM To: Frame works <FRAMEWORKS@JONASMEKASFILMS.COM>Subject: [Frameworks] digital Bolex
Someone just sent this to me, and I was curious if anyone has seen it too.
The D
Wow, that looks fantastic. Thanks for sharing.
Aaron
At 3/13/2012, you wrote:
Someone just sent this to me, and I was curious if anyone has seen it too.
The Digital Bolex.
www.kickstarter.com/projects/joedp/the-digital-bolex-the-1st-affordable-digital-cinem?ref=card
and if anyone has some
frameworks@jonasmekasfilms.com
Sent: Tuesday, 13 March 2012, 20:32
Subject: Re: [Frameworks] digital Bolex
It's the file-handling that scares me, working with Indiecams a year ago that
also produced DNGs was difficult to say the least. Looks like there's a
proprietary software that transcodes
This is bizarre. For $3300 you get an awkward, non-orientable b+w finder, and a
silly faux crank mechanism and non-ergonomic handgrip to make it kinda resemble
a Bolex?
Since the sensor and the viewfinder are spec'ed at 4:3, why are the two output
resolutions spec'ed at 16:9?
Why don't they
