Re: [Frameworks] double exposure

2011-11-09 Thread John Woods
>I'll add that you have to consider what is being double exposed on, once >you reach white saturation, no additional exposure will develop any >image in there. So would you suggest that it is better to do the first exposure on a nice dense object (say a human face) and then do a 2nd exposure o

Re: [Frameworks] double exposure

2011-11-09 Thread Steven Gladstone
Multiple exposures, don't forget "reciprocity failure" -- Steven Gladstone New York Based Cinematographer Gladstone films Blog - http://indiekicker.reelgrok.com/ http://www.blakehousemovie.com http://www.gladstonefilms.com 917-886-5858 ___ FrameWorks

Re: [Frameworks] double exposure

2011-11-09 Thread Jason Halprin
Zachary Iannazzi To: Experimental Film Discussion List Sent: Wednesday, November 9, 2011 3:36 PM Subject: Re: [Frameworks] double exposure Hope this helps,  someone else posted this chart for multiple exposures here a while ago. Number of exposure - Number of stops under exposure 1 - 0 2 - 1 3 -

Re: [Frameworks] double exposure

2011-11-09 Thread Ken Wood
that's pretty cool. Imagine, 32 exposures! Thanks to everyone for your answers, Ken - Original Message - From: "Zachary Iannazzi" To: "Experimental Film Discussion List" Sent: Wednesday, November 9, 2011 3:36:11 PM Subject: Re: [Frameworks] double exp

Re: [Frameworks] double exposure

2011-11-09 Thread Zachary Iannazzi
Hope this helps, someone else posted this chart for multiple exposures here a while ago. Number of exposure - Number of stops under exposure 1 - 0 2 - 1 3 - 1.5 4 - 2 5 - 2.25 6 - 2.5 7 - 2.75 8 - 3 9 - 3.1 10 - 3.25 11 - 3.35 12 - 3.5 13 - 3.6 14 - 3.75 15 - 3.8 16 - 4 20 - 4.2

Re: [Frameworks] double exposure

2011-11-09 Thread Steven Gladstone
On 11/9/11 9:03 AM, mike rice wrote: > its simple, if you think of fstops as doubling or halfing light, then > yes you would just compensate by stopping down. I'll add that you have to consider what is being double exposed on, once you reach white saturation, no additional exposure will develop a

Re: [Frameworks] double exposure

2011-11-09 Thread mike rice
its simple, if you think of fstops as doubling or halfing light, then yes you would just compensate by stopping down. HOWEVER, it gets a bit tricky when working with reversal film (not sure what kind of film you are using), because everything in the highlights is immediately gone, where as with neg

Re: [Frameworks] double exposure

2011-11-08 Thread Robbie
Subtract / stop down one f/stop each exposure. Ie, if exposure calls for f/11, set at f/16 and same for 2nd pass.. Sent from my iPod San Sabastian On Nov 8, 2011, at 18:03, Ken Wood wrote: Hey frameworkers, does anyone know an exposure rule-of-thumb for multiple exposures in camera? thanks Ken

[Frameworks] double exposure

2011-11-08 Thread Ken Wood
Hey frameworkers, does anyone know an exposure rule-of-thumb for multiple exposures in camera? thanks KenWood Milwaukee ___ FrameWorks mailing list FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks