On 20/07/12 13:14, Ben Sturmfels wrote:
Hi Folks,
At last night's discussion group, I mentioned that I'd like to see us
support the FSF's statement on Restricted Boot vs Secure Boot:
http://www.fsf.org/campaigns/secure-boot-vs-restricted-boot/statement
If anyone has any thoughts, please let
On 20/07/12 13:14, Ben Sturmfels wrote:
There was some concern about the strong phrase We commit that we will
neither purchase nor recommend computers that strip users of this
critical freedom, since it is foreseeable that someone could one day
buy one of these devices either unknowingly or
On 20/07/12 13:14, Ben Sturmfels wrote:
At last night's discussion group, I mentioned that I'd like to see us
support the FSF's statement on Restricted Boot vs Secure Boot:
http://www.fsf.org/campaigns/secure-boot-vs-restricted-boot/statement
That petition code is broken at the moment.. :-(
Hi Folks,
At last night's discussion group, I mentioned that I'd like to see us
support the FSF's statement on Restricted Boot vs Secure Boot:
http://www.fsf.org/campaigns/secure-boot-vs-restricted-boot/statement
If anyone has any thoughts, please let me know. Otherwise I'll email the
FSF this
