On 20-Sep-99 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I agree with you, but it even gets worse than that. Let me elaborate.
> The signal handling under LinuxThreads is different from the signal
> handling under POSIX threads for one. And, as far as I can tell, the
> signal handling is cooperative, and the curr
Jim Carlson sez:
>> Are calls to suspend and resume ref counted? iow, if i do this in
>> pseudo-code:
>
>No. It just does a SIGSTOP and SIGCONT for suspend and resume. The
>first resume after N>=1 suspends will cause the task to restart.
>
>> is that the way it works for pthreads?
>
>Pthreads do
> Are calls to suspend and resume ref counted? iow, if i do this in
> pseudo-code:
No. It just does a SIGSTOP and SIGCONT for suspend and resume. The
first resume after N>=1 suspends will cause the task to restart.
> is that the way it works for pthreads?
Pthreads doesn't really have suspend/
that is how i think it should work... and it is how i need it to work for my
download stuff to work correctly.
elrod
Isaac Richards wrote:
> >From what I can tell, nope. Shouldn't be more than 5 minutes work to add it,
> if that's how you want them to behave..
>
> Isaac
>
> On 20-Sep-99 Mark B
>From what I can tell, nope. Shouldn't be more than 5 minutes work to add it,
if that's how you want them to behave..
Isaac
On 20-Sep-99 Mark B. Elrod wrote:
> Are calls to suspend and resume ref counted? iow, if i do this in
> pseudo-code:
>
> thread->suspend();
> thread->suspend();
>
> thre
