On Wed, 18 Mar 2015 15:30:23 -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
On Mar 18, 2015, at 10:06 AM, Anthony Jenkins anthony.b.jenk...@att.net
wrote:
On 03/18/2015 11:29 AM, Warner Losh wrote:
On Mar 17, 2015, at 7:02 AM, Anthony Jenkins anthony.b.jenk...@att.net
wrote:
\Where else might
On Thu, 19 Mar 2015 09:11:08 -0400, Anthony Jenkins wrote:
On 03/19/2015 04:10 AM, Ian Smith wrote:
On Wed, 18 Mar 2015 15:30:23 -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
On Mar 18, 2015, at 10:06 AM, Anthony Jenkins
anthony.b.jenk...@att.net wrote:
On 03/18/2015 11:29 AM, Warner Losh
On 03/19/2015 09:49 AM, Ian Smith wrote:
On Thu, 19 Mar 2015 09:11:08 -0400, Anthony Jenkins wrote:
On 03/19/2015 04:10 AM, Ian Smith wrote:
On Wed, 18 Mar 2015 15:30:23 -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
On Mar 18, 2015, at 10:06 AM, Anthony Jenkins
anthony.b.jenk...@att.net wrote:
On 03/19/2015 04:10 AM, Ian Smith wrote:
On Wed, 18 Mar 2015 15:30:23 -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
On Mar 18, 2015, at 10:06 AM, Anthony Jenkins
anthony.b.jenk...@att.net wrote:
On 03/18/2015 11:29 AM, Warner Losh wrote:
On Mar 17, 2015, at 7:02 AM, Anthony Jenkins
On 03/18/2015 05:32 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
On Mar 18, 2015, at 9:59 AM, Anthony Jenkins anthony.b.jenk...@att.net
wrote:
On 03/18/2015 11:26 AM, Warner Losh wrote:
Looking at patch 5:
You need to rework this so there’s an atrtc_acpi.c. Put all the ACPI
attachment in there.
Okay,
On 03/18/2015 11:29 AM, Warner Losh wrote:
On Mar 17, 2015, at 7:02 AM, Anthony Jenkins anthony.b.jenk...@att.net
wrote:
\Where else might ATRTC_VERBOSE be set otherwise?
I'm picturing a (future?) config(5) knob, e.g.
device atrtc
options ATRTC_VERBOSE=1
so it can be set at
On Mar 17, 2015, at 7:02 AM, Anthony Jenkins anthony.b.jenk...@att.net
wrote:
\Where else might ATRTC_VERBOSE be set otherwise?
I'm picturing a (future?) config(5) knob, e.g.
device atrtc
options ATRTC_VERBOSE=1
so it can be set at compile time.
Why not just boot verbose?
Looking at patch 5:
You need to rework this so there’s an atrtc_acpi.c. Put all the ACPI attachment
in there. You should also split off the little bit that’s ISA-specific into
atrtc_isa. Once you do that, we can talk.
Warner
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using
On 03/18/2015 11:26 AM, Warner Losh wrote:
Looking at patch 5:
You need to rework this so there’s an atrtc_acpi.c. Put all the ACPI
attachment in there.
Okay, shouldn't be a problem.
You should also split off the little bit that’s ISA-specific into atrtc_isa.
You mean rtcin() and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 03/17/2015 08:28, Ian Smith wrote:
I still wonder if there isn't a global acpi_loaded_and_running
variable so you could avoid even attempting ACPI init calls,
perhaps making this not so dependent on ACPI, at least at runtime.
For runtime,
On Mar 18, 2015, at 9:59 AM, Anthony Jenkins anthony.b.jenk...@att.net
wrote:
On 03/18/2015 11:26 AM, Warner Losh wrote:
Looking at patch 5:
You need to rework this so there’s an atrtc_acpi.c. Put all the ACPI
attachment in there.
Okay, shouldn't be a problem.
You should also
On Mar 18, 2015, at 10:06 AM, Anthony Jenkins anthony.b.jenk...@att.net
wrote:
On 03/18/2015 11:29 AM, Warner Losh wrote:
On Mar 17, 2015, at 7:02 AM, Anthony Jenkins anthony.b.jenk...@att.net
wrote:
\Where else might ATRTC_VERBOSE be set otherwise?
I'm picturing a (future?) config(5)
On Mon, 16 Mar 2015 15:51:30 -0400, Anthony Jenkins wrote:
On 03/16/2015 01:49 PM, Ian Smith wrote:
On Mon, 16 Mar 2015 11:50:59 -0400, Anthony Jenkins wrote:
On 03/16/2015 11:00 AM, Anthony Jenkins wrote:
On 03/16/2015 09:59 AM, Ian Smith wrote:
On Sat, 14 Mar 2015 23:40:34
On 03/17/2015 08:28 AM, Ian Smith wrote:
On Mon, 16 Mar 2015 15:51:30 -0400, Anthony Jenkins wrote:
On 03/16/2015 01:49 PM, Ian Smith wrote:
On Mon, 16 Mar 2015 11:50:59 -0400, Anthony Jenkins wrote:
On 03/16/2015 11:00 AM, Anthony Jenkins wrote:
On 03/16/2015 09:59 AM, Ian
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 03/16/2015 15:51, Anthony Jenkins wrote:
On 03/16/2015 01:49 PM, Ian Smith wrote:
On Mon, 16 Mar 2015 11:50:59 -0400, Anthony Jenkins wrote:
On 03/16/2015 11:00 AM, Anthony Jenkins wrote:
On 03/16/2015 09:59 AM, Ian Smith wrote:
On Sat, 14
On 03/16/15 19:36, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
On 03/16/2015 15:51, Anthony Jenkins wrote:
On 03/16/2015 01:49 PM, Ian Smith wrote:
On Mon, 16 Mar 2015 11:50:59 -0400, Anthony Jenkins wrote:
On 03/16/2015 11:00 AM, Anthony Jenkins wrote:
On 03/16/2015 09:59 AM, Ian Smith wrote:
On Sat, 14 Mar
On 03/16/2015 01:49 PM, Ian Smith wrote:
On Mon, 16 Mar 2015 11:50:59 -0400, Anthony Jenkins wrote:
On 03/16/2015 11:00 AM, Anthony Jenkins wrote:
On 03/16/2015 09:59 AM, Ian Smith wrote:
On Sat, 14 Mar 2015 23:40:34 -0400, Anthony Jenkins wrote:
+if
17 matches
Mail list logo