On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 10:47 PM, Brandon Gooch
wrote:
> On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 9:04 AM, Giovanni Trematerra
> wrote:
>> On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 9:12 PM, Brandon Gooch
>> wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 7:25 PM, Giovanni Trematerra
>>> wrote:
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 1:09 AM, Brandon Go
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 9:04 AM, Giovanni Trematerra
wrote:
> On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 9:12 PM, Brandon Gooch
> wrote:
>> On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 7:25 PM, Giovanni Trematerra
>> wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 1:09 AM, Brandon Gooch
>>> wrote:
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 9:41 AM, Attilio Rao
Is it faster to call sched_bind() temporarily in acpi_cpu_notify()
than locking around many places?
If we successfully sched_bind() to the subject CPU, I think we're guaranteed
that the acpi_cpu_idle() is not running on that CPU.
On Tue, 18 May 2010 16:04:07 +0200
Giovanni Trematerra wrote:
>
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 9:12 PM, Brandon Gooch
wrote:
> On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 7:25 PM, Giovanni Trematerra
> wrote:
>> On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 1:09 AM, Brandon Gooch
>> wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 9:41 AM, Attilio Rao wrote:
2010/5/12 David DEMELIER :
> I remove the patch, and
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 7:25 PM, Giovanni Trematerra
wrote:
> On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 1:09 AM, Brandon Gooch
> wrote:
>> On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 9:41 AM, Attilio Rao wrote:
>>> 2010/5/12 David DEMELIER :
I remove the patch, and built the kernel (I updated the src this
morning) and it d
on 14/05/2010 03:25 Giovanni Trematerra said the following:
> Attilio and I came up with this patch. It seems ready for stress
> testing and review
> Please test and report back.
It seems that there is inconsistent indentation for some of new lines.
Original style seems to be softtabstop=4 tabstop
2010/5/14 Giovanni Trematerra :
> On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 1:09 AM, Brandon Gooch
> wrote:
>> On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 9:41 AM, Attilio Rao wrote:
>>> 2010/5/12 David DEMELIER :
I remove the patch, and built the kernel (I updated the src this
morning) and it does not panic now. It's reall
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 1:09 AM, Brandon Gooch
wrote:
> On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 9:41 AM, Attilio Rao wrote:
>> 2010/5/12 David DEMELIER :
>>> I remove the patch, and built the kernel (I updated the src this
>>> morning) and it does not panic now. It's really odd. If it reappears
>>> soon I will t
Would you be so kind to try to revert this patch?
I'm just guessing
You have to pass -R flag to patch program to apply the patch
=
--- head/sys/dev/acpica/acpi_acad.c 2009/06/05 18:44:36 193530
+++ head/sys/dev/acpica/acpi_acad.c 2009/09/30 17:07:49 197649
On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 12:45:46PM +0100, Rui Paulo wrote:
> Please try this patch:
>
> Index: acpi_cpu.c
> ===
> --- acpi_cpu.c(revision 207322)
> +++ acpi_cpu.c(working copy)
> @@ -997,12 +997,12 @@
> if (notify
Please try this patch:
Index: acpi_cpu.c
===
--- acpi_cpu.c (revision 207322)
+++ acpi_cpu.c (working copy)
@@ -997,12 +997,12 @@
if (notify != ACPI_NOTIFY_CX_STATES)
return;
+ACPI_SERIAL_BEGIN(cpu);
/* Updat
On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 10:49:23AM +0100, Rui Paulo wrote:
>
> On 5 May 2010, at 08:40, Demelier David wrote:
>
> > On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 01:19:45AM +0100, Rui Paulo wrote:
> >> On 4 May 2010, at 21:38, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 10:27:23PM +0200, David DEMELIER
On 5 May 2010, at 08:40, Demelier David wrote:
> On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 01:19:45AM +0100, Rui Paulo wrote:
>> On 4 May 2010, at 21:38, Kostik Belousov wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 10:27:23PM +0200, David DEMELIER wrote:
2010/5/4 Kostik Belousov :
> On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 06:3
On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 01:19:45AM +0100, Rui Paulo wrote:
> On 4 May 2010, at 21:38, Kostik Belousov wrote:
>
> > On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 10:27:23PM +0200, David DEMELIER wrote:
> >> 2010/5/4 Kostik Belousov :
> >>> On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 06:35:52PM +0200, David DEMELIER wrote:
> Good news
On 4 May 2010, at 21:38, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 10:27:23PM +0200, David DEMELIER wrote:
>> 2010/5/4 Kostik Belousov :
>>> On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 06:35:52PM +0200, David DEMELIER wrote:
Good news ! It worked, check the picture here :
http://img63.imageshac
On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 10:27:23PM +0200, David DEMELIER wrote:
> 2010/5/4 Kostik Belousov :
> > On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 06:35:52PM +0200, David DEMELIER wrote:
> >> Good news ! It worked, check the picture here :
> >>
> >> http://img63.imageshack.us/img63/4244/dsc00361g.jpg
> >
> > Please try addi
16 matches
Mail list logo