Daniel Seuffert wrote:
But don't forget: It's hard work and you need people doing this work.
That's the problematic part and that's the main reason imho why we
don't have more media attention...
Is there not a project (other than this mailing list) within the work of
the FreeBSD Foundation to
Paul Waring wrote:
Daniel Seuffert wrote:
But don't forget: It's hard work and you need people doing this work.
That's the problematic part and that's the main reason imho why we
don't have more media attention...
Is there not a project (other than this mailing list) within the work of
From my end I've never given this a thought. Thinking about it now,
I'd happily praise the virtues of FreeBSD in an article (giving
proportionally equal time to it's drawbacks... few that they are),
except I don't subscribe to any Linux mags, so I've no clue even what
they would want.
Maybe
Jim Stapleton wrote:
I'd happily praise the virtues of FreeBSD in an article (giving
proportionally equal time to it's drawbacks... few that they are),
except I don't subscribe to any Linux mags, so I've no clue even what
they would want.
The feeling I get is that actually a lot of these
On 06/04/2007, at 7:51 PM, Robert Watson wrote:
Now would be a great time to do some articles on this, speaking of
which. :-) Pawel's e-mail doesn't make a great start for an
advocacy piece because it fails to say what's good/important about
ZFS, so the first task is to figure that out
Sam Lawrance wrote:
Would it be worthwhile to form a media coordinator role? I can think
of two areas of value for this role: announcement coordination and media
liaison.
I think something like that would be worthwhile, not only is it much
easier from the point of view of developers to have
