"Li-Lun \"Leland\" Wang" wrote:
> ... the kernel or LD should know a 32-bit binary is being run
> and return proper structures, as is done in Mac OS.
>
> ... Do we have plans to fix this kind of problems in general?
> Although wine port on FreeBSD is only supported for ARCH=i386,
> could there be
Note: to view an individual PR, use:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number).
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users.
These represent problem reports covering all versions including
experimental development code and obsolete releases.
S Tracker
On Sunday, October 23, 2011 7:04:51 pm Li-Lun "Leland" Wang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Although I only encounter this kind of problem when running wine
> (because it is one of the few ports that need to compile into 32-bit),
> it is a problem of i386 binaries on x64 FreeBSD in general.
>
> The problem that
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 7:01 AM, wrote:
> "Li-Lun \"Leland\" Wang" wrote:
>
>> ... the kernel or LD should know a 32-bit binary is being run
>> and return proper structures, as is done in Mac OS.
>>
>> ... Do we have plans to fix this kind of problems in general?
>> Although wine port on FreeBSD
>Number: 161968
>Category: amd64
>Synopsis: renaming snapshot with -r including a zvol snapshot causes
>total ZFS freeze/lockup
>Confidential: no
>Severity: critical
>Priority: high
>Responsible:freebsd-amd64
>State: open
>Quarter:
>Keywords:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 2:30 AM, wrote:
> "Li-Lun \"Leland\" Wang" wrote:
>> ... I do believe the 64-bit kernel returns 64-bit
>> structures even in 32-bit jails.
>
> That is arguably a bug in the jail support :(
I think the only difference as a i386 jail is that the libraries are
built 32bit,
"Li-Lun \"Leland\" Wang" wrote:
> a lot of things (e.g. certain devices in the devfs)
> are not available in the jail.
I have gotten the impression that there's a way to fix
that -- it involves something along the lines of a nullfs
mount IIRC -- but I'm by no means an expert on jails.
> ... I d
