https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206478
Marcelo Araujo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206478
--- Comment #18 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:
Author: araujo
Date: Thu Feb 25 15:33:55 UTC 2016
New revision: 296040
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/296040
Log:
MFH 295796 (based on)
Fix
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206478
--- Comment #16 from Pushkar Kothavade ---
Thanks Marcelo.
Three reviewers have accepted the changes.
Could you please tell me check-in process ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206478
--- Comment #14 from Pushkar Kothavade ---
Hi Marcelo,
I have created a separate bug (Bug 206921) for 11.0-CURRENT.
I am testing your patch on 11.0-CURRENT setup.
Will post the test results once done.
Thanks,
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206478
--- Comment #13 from Pushkar Kothavade ---
Hi Marcelo, I will do the needful.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206478
--- Comment #12 from Marcelo Araujo ---
(In reply to Pushkar Kothavade from comment #9)
Sure, we should track it with two different bug reports.
Do you mind open another one for the CURRENT with the reference to that
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206478
Pushkar Kothavade changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206478
--- Comment #9 from Pushkar Kothavade ---
Hi Marcelo Araujo,
As per your patch, 'laggproto none' is not a valid configuration option.
But as per the 'lagg' man page, laggproto none is a valid configuration option.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206478
--- Comment #10 from Pushkar Kothavade ---
Thanks Marcelo for your feedback.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206478
--- Comment #15 from Marcelo Araujo ---
I have the approve necessary to commit it, but I will give an extra couple of
days to other people involved to take a double look on it.
Thanks for the patch!
--
You are
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206478
Mark Linimon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-patch |patch
--
You
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206478
Marcelo Araujo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|Open|In Progress
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206478
Gopal changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gopu.0...@gmail.com
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206478
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|New |Open
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206478
Marcelo Araujo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206478
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Setting laggproto fails on |Setting
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206478
--- Comment #3 from Erin Clark ---
(In reply to LN from comment #2)
That portion of code appears different in 10.2-STABLE, is this perhaps the part
that should be changed in that?
if (proto->ti_proto ==
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206478
LN changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206478
Bug ID: 206478
Summary: Setting laggproto fails on 10.2
Product: Base System
Version: 10.2-STABLE
Hardware: amd64
OS: Any
Status: New
Severity:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206478
Mark Linimon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||regression
20 matches
Mail list logo