Re: Video Card for FreeBSD 9.0 (RC2) AMD64

2011-12-15 Thread Matt Dawson
On Thursday 15 Dec 2011 09:30:38 Gary Jennejohn wrote: > Just for the record it turns out that the signal 11 was apparently > the result of having AIGLX (default) set for xorg-srerver. After > disabling the option Xorg appears to be running stabily using > nvidia-driver. This wouldn't, by any cha

Re: Video Card for FreeBSD 9.0 (RC2) AMD64

2011-12-15 Thread Gary Jennejohn
On Wed, 14 Dec 2011 16:10:11 +0100 Gary Jennejohn wrote: > On Wed, 14 Dec 2011 14:08:31 + > Matt Dawson wrote: > > > [1] I have three Radeon X850XT cards here which were, until the r600 > > import, the fastest 3D cards supported by FreeBSD's DRI subsystem[2]. > > While they worked, FSVO "

Re: Video Card for FreeBSD 9.0 (RC2) AMD64

2011-12-14 Thread Thomas D. Dean
On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 14:22 -0500, Dieter BSD wrote: > Have you tried setting your own modeline? I managed to get a > crappy onboard ATI RAGE XL to do 1920x1080. (With help from some > nice folks on the questions@ list.) I tried the modeline reported by the monitor without the x60.0. The moni

Re: Video Card for FreeBSD 9.0 (RC2) AMD64

2011-12-14 Thread Gary Jennejohn
On Wed, 14 Dec 2011 14:08:31 + Matt Dawson wrote: > [1] I have three Radeon X850XT cards here which were, until the r600 > import, the fastest 3D cards supported by FreeBSD's DRI subsystem[2]. > While they worked, FSVO "work," the humble GF 210 wipes the floor with > them in terms of stabi

Re: Video Card for FreeBSD 9.0 (RC2) AMD64

2011-12-14 Thread Matt Dawson
On Tuesday 13 Dec 2011 22:21:55 Dieter BSD wrote: > Matt writes: > > [The n]Vidia binary blob and the support from nVidia on the forums > > is generally accepted as a best-effort endeavour. > > Binary blobs are completely unacceptable, and there are multiple > good reasons for this. There are a

Re: Video Card for FreeBSD 9.0 (RC2) AMD64

2011-12-13 Thread Doug Barton
On 12/13/2011 14:21, Dieter BSD wrote: > John writes: >> As an open source developer I am in regular contact with >> developers from nvidia who support the >> nvidia driver on FreeBSD that they actively maintain. > > I wasn't aware that nvidia was maintaining an open source driver > for their card

Re: Video Card for FreeBSD 9.0 (RC2) AMD64

2011-12-13 Thread Dieter BSD
John writes: > As an open source developer I am in regular contact with > developers from nvidia who support the > nvidia driver on FreeBSD that they actively maintain. I wasn't aware that nvidia was maintaining an open source driver for their cards.  When did this happen?  Seems like this would h

Re: Video Card for FreeBSD 9.0 (RC2) AMD64

2011-12-13 Thread Doug Barton
On 12/13/2011 04:54, Matt Dawson wrote: > On Monday 12 Dec 2011 19:22:55 Dieter BSD wrote: >> Full support requires full documentation or full >> reverse-engineering. nVidia is openly hostile towards FLOSS, I >> don't expect any documentation from them in the forseeable future. >> AMD/ATI is worki

Re: Video Card for FreeBSD 9.0 (RC2) AMD64

2011-12-13 Thread Thomas D. Dean
On Tue, 2011-12-13 at 03:33 +0100, Gary Jennejohn wrote: > Try running ``make config'' and turn off Linux support, which is on by > default. > Works, thanks. Now, hurry, hurry UPS. tomdean ___ freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.free

Re: Video Card for FreeBSD 9.0 (RC2) AMD64

2011-12-13 Thread Robert Huff
Matt Dawson writes: > There are reasons why nVidia cannot release specifications, > particularly on their PureVideo technology, which happen to be > the same reasons AMD can't release theirs: They don't fully own > those technologies. As long as any of it remains closed, there will b

Re: Video Card for FreeBSD 9.0 (RC2) AMD64

2011-12-13 Thread John Baldwin
On Monday, December 12, 2011 2:22:55 pm Dieter BSD wrote: > Thomas D. Dean wrote: > >> I have been looking for a video card that FreeBSD 9.0 (RC2) AMD64 > >> supports fully. Nothing, so far. > > Full support requires full documentation or full reverse-engineering. > nVidia is openly hostile towar

Re: Video Card for FreeBSD 9.0 (RC2) AMD64

2011-12-13 Thread Matt Dawson
On Monday 12 Dec 2011 19:22:55 Dieter BSD wrote: > Full support requires full documentation or full > reverse-engineering. nVidia is openly hostile towards FLOSS, I > don't expect any documentation from them in the forseeable future. > AMD/ATI is working on documenting their chips, but seems to be

Re: Video Card for FreeBSD 9.0 (RC2) AMD64

2011-12-12 Thread RW
On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 17:50:00 -0800 Thomas D. Dean wrote: > I guess this means there is no "native FreeBSD AMD64" driver, but, > linux emulation of a driver. Or, do I mis-understand linux emulation? The driver *is* a 64 bit native driver. The linux support is there so linux binaries can get the

Re: Video Card for FreeBSD 9.0 (RC2) AMD64

2011-12-12 Thread Gary Jennejohn
On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 17:50:00 -0800 "Thomas D. Dean" wrote: > On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 22:46 +, RW wrote: > > ports/x11/nvidia-driver requires linux to install. > > Building the port works fine. > > Installing the port requires 'kldload linux' before the port will > install. > > Seems like so

Re: Video Card for FreeBSD 9.0 (RC2) AMD64

2011-12-12 Thread Thomas D. Dean
On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 22:46 +, RW wrote: ports/x11/nvidia-driver requires linux to install. Building the port works fine. Installing the port requires 'kldload linux' before the port will install. Seems like something is mixed-up. But, kldload nvidia also loads linux. I guess this means t

Re: Video Card for FreeBSD 9.0 (RC2) AMD64

2011-12-12 Thread RW
On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 12:31:41 + Matt Dawson wrote: > nVidia is currently the *only* way to > go for fully supported graphics past basic DDX. Radeons can be > coerced into some semblance of 3D support but there's no xvmc or > stream decode support at all for us. fglrx has it, but that's Linux >

Re: Video Card for FreeBSD 9.0 (RC2) AMD64

2011-12-12 Thread Dieter BSD
Thomas D. Dean wrote: >> I have been looking for a video card that FreeBSD 9.0 (RC2) AMD64 >> supports fully.  Nothing, so far. Full support requires full documentation or full reverse-engineering. nVidia is openly hostile towards FLOSS, I don't expect any documentation from them in the forseeable

Re: Video Card for FreeBSD 9.0 (RC2) AMD64

2011-12-12 Thread Thomas D. Dean
On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 12:31 +, Matt Dawson wrote: I found a MSI N210-MD512D3/LP GeForce 210 512MB 64-bit DDR3 PCI Express 2.0 x16 HDCP Ready Video Card http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814127603 Is this the kind of video card for xterm and gnuplot? This is about 1/5 th

Re: Video Card for FreeBSD 9.0 (RC2) AMD64

2011-12-12 Thread Matt Dawson
On Monday 12 Dec 2011 05:56:31 you wrote: > These are two different requirements. A "fully supported video > card" would mean that you can access all the features of the video > chip set. On 64bit FreeBSD, that pretty much lets out NVidia and > ATI - neither release full docs or 64bit proprietary d

Re: Video Card for FreeBSD 9.0 (RC2) AMD64

2011-12-12 Thread O. Hartmann
On 12/12/11 06:22, Thomas D. Dean wrote: > ASUS P9X79 Motherboard, Intel i7-3930K, Diamond Radeon HD 6870 Vide, > ASUS VS228 Monitor. > > I have been looking for a video card that FreeBSD 9.0 (RC2) AMD64 > supports fully. Nothing, so far. > > If you recall, I had to use the Vesa driver with the

Re: Video Card for FreeBSD 9.0 (RC2) AMD64

2011-12-11 Thread Mike Meyer
On Sun, 11 Dec 2011 21:22:39 -0800 "Thomas D. Dean" wrote: > ASUS P9X79 Motherboard, Intel i7-3930K, Diamond Radeon HD 6870 Vide, > ASUS VS228 Monitor. > > I have been looking for a video card that FreeBSD 9.0 (RC2) AMD64 > supports fully. Nothing, so far. [...] > I need a video card that will

Video Card for FreeBSD 9.0 (RC2) AMD64

2011-12-11 Thread Thomas D. Dean
ASUS P9X79 Motherboard, Intel i7-3930K, Diamond Radeon HD 6870 Vide, ASUS VS228 Monitor. I have been looking for a video card that FreeBSD 9.0 (RC2) AMD64 supports fully. Nothing, so far. If you recall, I had to use the Vesa driver with the existing card because KMS is not implemented. And, it