https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=268580
Nathan Huff changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |Overcome By Events
Statu
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=268580
--- Comment #6 from Ihor Antonov ---
Sorry, disregard my previous comment. SIGKILL after delay is planned.
I will use EVFILT_TIMER for this.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=268580
--- Comment #5 from Ihor Antonov ---
We can add sleep before sending SITERM to the child, but why is this needed?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=268580
--- Comment #4 from Nathan Huff ---
I think the only thing the kqueue version doesn't do that my patch does is send
SIGKILL to the supervised process after the delay. I see there is a TODO in
the kqueue version to do something like that, b
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=268580
--- Comment #3 from Ihor Antonov ---
Nathan's motivation for the shutdown delay is to avoid race conditions caused
by asynchronous signal processing.
After https://reviews.freebsd.org/rG8935a3993219be76c7ea03e9ad4509657d08af6c
was merged
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=268580
Mina Galić changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||free...@igalic.co
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=268580
Ihor Antonov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ihor@antonovs.family
--- Comment #1
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=268580
Graham Perrin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[PATCH] Add shutdown delay |Add shutdown delay to
