Hi,
Claus Guttesen wrote:
Hi.
I know this is a bit off-topic but it will probably have some impact
Isn't chat the better list for this?
on the ongoing work with FreeBSD. As most know by now Apple will base
it's next-generation hardware on the x86-architecture moving away from
the PowerPC.
Bruce A. Mah wrote:
If memory serves me right, Kevin Kinsey wrote:
I'm looking at a situation which I imagine is common to many institutions,
in which I'll want to have a small LAN with full access to LAN resources,
but not allowing any gateway access unless a "supervisor" type person
autho
Jared wrote:
Thanks for the reply!
I have used a proxy server in the past with a similar situation as
yours, I didn't have many problems with it.
Right, but the idea is that I don't have to control the server,
but a somewhat "illiterate" (geek-wise) person (read, lab
instructor, group
If memory serves me right, Kevin Kinsey wrote:
> I'm looking at a situation which I imagine is common to many institutions,
> in which I'll want to have a small LAN with full access to LAN resources,
> but not allowing any gateway access unless a "supervisor" type person
> authorizes the excursion
I have used a proxy server in the past with a similar situation as
yours, I didn't have many problems with it.
On 6/6/05, Kevin Kinsey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I'm looking at a situation which I imagine is common to many institutions,
> in which I'll want to have a small LAN wi
Greetings,
I'm looking at a situation which I imagine is common to many institutions,
in which I'll want to have a small LAN with full access to LAN resources,
but not allowing any gateway access unless a "supervisor" type person
authorizes the excursion.
What should I consider? A proxy server?
