John Baldwin wrote:
On Jun 8, 2005, at 10:30 PM, Stephen Hurd wrote:
As there is FreeBSD port to the PowerPC and its peripherals, this
machine will make a very interesting target for FreeBSD: combine the
x86 code base with the PowerPC drivers and get a real hot machine.
The *really* hot
At 09:40 AM 6/8/2005, Przemysław Nowaczyk wrote:
>I've tried that too. The box beeps 1 long and 3 short ones.. as far as I know
>it 'tells' that way that it cannot be run without a video card..
>hehe, stupid mainboard :P
Try telling it not to test or shadow video memory. On a classic IBM PC, the
On Thu, 9 Jun 2005 12:57:11 -0700
Freddie Cash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On June 9, 2005 12:43 pm, you wrote:
> > Freddie Cash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > If they went with AMD processors, then they would have to either
> > > build or find someone to build a chipset.
>
> > FYI, AMD makes
Hi,
Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
"Jeremy C. Reed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Or Mac OS X moves to use the FreeBSD kernel. It seems like I have heard
this before.
This simly isn't going to happen, and you are incredibly naïve to
Wasn't this the line I heard pretty often before Monday?
Appl
On June 9, 2005 12:43 pm, you wrote:
> Freddie Cash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > If they went with AMD processors, then they would have to either
> > build or find someone to build a chipset.
> FYI, AMD makes chipsets.
Yes, and some nices ones at that, especially on the server side (our new
d
"Jeremy C. Reed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Or Mac OS X moves to use the FreeBSD kernel. It seems like I have heard
> this before.
This simly isn't going to happen, and you are incredibly naïve to
except that it would. It's like expecting Microsoft to switch to the
OpenBSD kernel now that they
Freddie Cash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If they went with AMD processors, then they would have to either
> build or find someone to build a chipset.
FYI, AMD makes chipsets.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-chat@freebsd.or
On Thu, 9 Jun 2005, John Baldwin wrote:
> > The *really* hot machine is going to be the OSX ABI supported under
> > FreeBSD and running Aqua. I betcha this happens FAST.
>
> I doubt it would be fast at all if it even happens. Unlike Linux,
> svr4, and ibcs2, OS X is not just a POSIXish UNIX kern
On June 8, 2005 02:24 pm, Nicole wrote:
> On 07-Jun-05 My Homeland Security "observers" reported that Erich
> Dollansky said:
> > Claus Guttesen wrote:
> >> on the ongoing work with FreeBSD. As most know by now Apple will base
> >> it's next-generation hardware on the x86-architecture moving away
>
On Thu, 9 Jun 2005 07:27:48 -0700
John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The *really* hot machine is going to be the OSX ABI supported under
> > FreeBSD and running Aqua. I betcha this happens FAST.
>
> I doubt it would be fast at all if it even happens. Unlike Linux,
> svr4, and ibcs2,
On Jun 8, 2005, at 10:30 PM, Stephen Hurd wrote:
As there is FreeBSD port to the PowerPC and its peripherals, this
machine will make a very interesting target for FreeBSD: combine the
x86 code base with the PowerPC drivers and get a real hot machine.
The *really* hot machine is going to be
On Jun 2, 2005, at 7:31 PM, Josh Paetzel wrote:
I have an intel PR440FX dual socket 8 motherboard here populated with
2x 200mhz 512K cache Pentium Pro CPUs and 320 megs of RAM. It has
onboard wide SCSI and I have a pair of 4.3 gig drives for it + the
cable. Also has the typical 2x IDE channel
12 matches
Mail list logo
