James Bailie [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Efficiency is of prime importance in systems programming. The
only language in which one can write more efficient programs than
in C, is assembler, but it's not portable.
This is a myth. I'm surprised to see it a Lisp programmer perpetuate
it.
DES
--
On Sunday 16 April 2006 17:04, Yuri Grebenkin wrote:
[...]
By the way, one can realize OOP-model in C better than in C++ if needed.
That is an interesting statement. I see how you can simulate OOP in C, but can
you explain how one could realize it better than with C++?
Cheers
Benjamin
Thanks for your comments all that replied.
So to summarize, it seems there are really no technical reasons to not use C++
for base system apps in FreeBSD. A quick look at /usr/src reveals a number of
programs that do actually use C++: devd, gperf, groff and OpenSSL. The
reasons seem to be
Hi,
Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
James Bailie [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Efficiency is of prime importance in systems programming. The
only language in which one can write more efficient programs than
in C, is assembler, but it's not portable.
This is a myth. I'm surprised to see it a Lisp
