Re: What ever happened to Terasolutions?

2006-04-20 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Thu, 20 Apr 2006, Francisco Reyes wrote: Marc G. Fournier writes: I'm running AMD64 on HP Proliant G4p server with Dual 64bit Xeon CPUs ... How much Ram Marc? 6G of RAM ... again, note that these are 64bit servers, and I believe these servers max out at 24G (6x4G DIMMs) ... Marc

Re: What ever happened to Terasolutions?

2006-04-20 Thread Jeremy C. Reed
On Thu, 20 Apr 2006, Francisco Reyes wrote: > > I am using FreeBSD/amd64 on CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.80GHz (2793.02-MHz > > K8-class CPU) > > On a single CPU board or SMP? 4 CPUs Jeremy C. Reed echo ':6DB6=88>?;@69876tA=AC8BB5tA6487><' | tr '4-F' 'wu rofIn.lkigemca' _

Re: yezip news

2006-04-20 Thread Daniel A.
On 4/21/06, Labhra Cooksey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dea x r Home Ow l ne m r , > > Your cr c ed o it doesn't matter to us ! If you O h WN real e n st z at > y e > and want IM m MED u IAT h E cas l h to sp e en s d ANY way you like, or > simply wish > to L a OWER your monthly pa s ym y ents by a

Re: What ever happened to Terasolutions?

2006-04-20 Thread Francisco Reyes
Jeremy C. Reed writes: I am using FreeBSD/amd64 on CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.80GHz (2793.02-MHz K8-class CPU) On a single CPU board or SMP? ___ freebsd-chat@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-chat To unsubsc

Re: What ever happened to Terasolutions?

2006-04-20 Thread Francisco Reyes
Marc G. Fournier writes: I'm running AMD64 on HP Proliant G4p server with Dual 64bit Xeon CPUs ... How much Ram Marc? Wondering at which point it will make sense, for us, to start going above 4GB. In particular if the processes running are close to using all 4GB, then there is nothing/littl

Re: What ever happened to Terasolutions?

2006-04-20 Thread Darren Pilgrim
Francisco Reyes wrote: Oliver Fromme writes: Depending on the board, only 3 to 3.5 GByte will be usable, the rest is used by PCI configuration space. If you need more RAM, you must run 64bit (amd64), and make sure that you don't depend on software that isn't 64bit-clean. So 4GB and more, req

Re: What ever happened to Terasolutions?

2006-04-20 Thread Jeremy C. Reed
On Thu, 20 Apr 2006, Francisco Reyes wrote: > Out of curiosity does FreeBSD AMD64 works on Intel 64 bit chips? I am using FreeBSD/amd64 on CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.80GHz (2793.02-MHz K8-class CPU) (Note that it was a hassle knowing that amd64 was okay.) Jeremy C. Reed echo ':6DB6=88>?;@6

Re: What ever happened to Terasolutions?

2006-04-20 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Thu, 20 Apr 2006, Francisco Reyes wrote: Oliver Fromme writes: Depending on the board, only 3 to 3.5 GByte will be usable, the rest is used by PCI configuration space. If you need more RAM, you must run 64bit (amd64), and make sure that you don't depend on software that isn't 64bit-clean.

Re: What ever happened to Terasolutions?

2006-04-20 Thread Francisco Reyes
Oliver Fromme writes: Depending on the board, only 3 to 3.5 GByte will be usable, the rest is used by PCI configuration space. If you need more RAM, you must run 64bit (amd64), and make sure that you don't depend on software that isn't 64bit-clean. So 4GB and more, requires 64bit CPUs? Out o

Re: yezip news

2006-04-20 Thread Labhra Cooksey
Dea x r Home Ow l ne m r , Your cr c ed o it doesn't matter to us ! If you O h WN real e n st z at y e and want IM m MED u IAT h E cas l h to sp e en s d ANY way you like, or simply wish to L a OWER your monthly pa s ym y ents by a third or more, here are the dea v ls we have T t OD v AY :

Re: Why is not more FreeBSD software written in C++?

2006-04-20 Thread Benjamin Lutz
On Sunday 16 April 2006 12:33, Dan Strick wrote: > I really like C++ but I am not sure how to deal with the performance > problems. They are not so trivial that they can always be ignored. > I have done a few casual benchmarks. Code that uses C++ strings > can run up to 100 times slower than func

Re: Why is not more FreeBSD software written in C++?

2006-04-20 Thread Dan Strick
Most software is probably written in C ranther than C++ because fewer programmers are familiar with C++. Note that this means C++ programs are in a practical sense less portable and more difficult to maintain even though the GNU C++ compiler is a good implementation, widely available and pretty mu

Re: Why is not more FreeBSD software written in C++?

2006-04-20 Thread Dan Strick
OOPS ... I accidentally sent off that last message on the subject: Re: Why is not more FreeBSD software written in C++? while trying to run ispell on it. In addition to fixing a bunch of typos that I trust everyone will just ignore, I wanted to add: I really like C++ but I am not sure h

Re: What ever happened to Terasolutions?

2006-04-20 Thread Oliver Fromme
Francisco Reyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Our priorities are not that complex... > 1- It MUST work flawlesly with FreeBSD. (1) > 2- Dual CPU, 4GB RAM with all 4GB visible(2) That isn't possible if you need to run 32bit (i386). Depending on the board, only 3 to 3.5 GByte will be usable, the r