On Sunday, 4 June 2006 at 23:14:13 -0500, Nikolas Britton wrote:
>
> How much would it take to get The Open Group to re-certify FreeBSD
> as UNIX and what would it take for FreeBSD to meet the requirements
> for UNIX certification,
Probably more money and effort than we have.
> and would it be b
On 6/4/06, Greg 'groggy' Lehey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sunday, 4 June 2006 at 9:35:47 +0200, Dag-Erling Smrgrav wrote:
> Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Technically FreeBSD has more right than
On Sunday, 4 June 2006 at 9:35:47 +0200, Dag-Erling Smrgrav wrote:
> Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Technically FreeBSD has more right than SCO UNIX to be called UNIX
>>> No. Unlike FreeBSD, SCO Unix
Mark Ovens wrote on Sun, 04 Jun 2006 16:40:
> The first 3 entries on that page:
>
> Rank OSServer Netblock Owner
> 1 BSD/OS Microsoft-IIS/5.0 NEC Soft,Ltd.
> 2 BSD/OS Microsoft-IIS/6.0 NEC Soft,Ltd.
> 3 BSD/OS Microsoft-IIS/5.0 NEC Soft,Lt
Allen wrote:
Anyway did no one think of bringing this up?:
http://uptime.netcraft.net/up/today/top.avg.html
Almost every box here is BSD, Free BSD, or Linux. And if you know a
good one with major uptime, you can check for it and eventually it
gets added.
The first 3 entries on that page:
R
Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Technically FreeBSD has more right than SCO UNIX to be called UNIX
> > No. Unlike FreeBSD, SCO UnixWare is a direct descendent of the
> > original AT&T Unix.
> So is / wa
