Re: The future of NetBSD

2006-09-09 Thread Darrin Chandler
If you're going to keep chatting about the bsdstats thing would you please stop cross posting to so many lists? It's very irritating. -- Darrin Chandler| Phoenix BSD Users Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://bsd.phoenix.az.us/ http://www.stilyagin.com/ |

Re: The future of NetBSD

2006-09-09 Thread Adam
Thorsten Glaser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Marc G. Fournier dixit: And what I'm learning with bsdstats.org is that there are more then just those four ... GNU/kFreeBSD is reporting Now _that_'s funny ;) -snip- The five big ones are DF/Free/Mir/Net/Open though. Not as funny as

Re: The future of NetBSD

2006-09-09 Thread Constantine A. Murenin
On 05/09/06, Marco Peereboom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't think that binary only drivers are well enough. Surely better than nothing but ... No fucking way. No support is FAR FAR better than a blob. Yes, really! Indeed! When something brakes, do you want it to continue to work as if

Re: The future of NetBSD

2006-09-09 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Sun, 10 Sep 2006, Thorsten Glaser wrote: Daniel Seuffert (from AllBSD.de) today said he intends that your script to be installed AND ENABLED BY DEFAULT in every BSD release/snapshot, and he will definitively enable it in DesktopBSD 2.0. I will probably do the same for MirOS, as I currently