I see your point. But again the problem arises of if you have one big fat
sign "BSD" which BSD are you developing for?
Without having at least a universal package management system if you don't
want each individual BSD developments to be porting drivers across.
Which i believe is already in place
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012, at 14:18, Martin wrote:
> My point is about the possibility of creating a new BSD project (with
> separate developers) that aims for 100% compatibility with at least
> FreeBSD, NetBSD, OpenBSD and maybe DragonflyBSD.
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012, at 22:43, matthew sporleder wrote:
>
