I will miss them, for me they were right there
with-
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=238968
* http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=248200
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Farewell-to-fortune-o-tp5817389.html
Sent fro
I'm sure precise and clear described problems/questions [1]
are not out of place on -questions, moreover you can
always use http://forums.freebsd.org/forumdisplay.php?f=4
[1] http://www.gerv.net/hacking/how-to-ask-good-questions/
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nab
IF you trust Opera and IF you trust said extension, there
is always Ghostery with very wide selection of blocking
tracking scripts, google related included.
This is probably most user friendly solution of unfortunate
state of modern web. FYI, freshports.org supplementary
uses google search al
mksh is certainly not, and I use it daily
on FreeBSD and really like it.
The same I could say about openntpd
from OpenBSD.
Isn't it like it should be then?
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Unified-BSD-tp5760356p5760566.html
Sent from the freebsd-chat ma
+1
Also, all projects being _open_ it's not like
there isn't any useful cross-talk in sources, there
is.
And all projects can focus on their precise goals.
Win-win.
Of course, if some sub-goals are common,
collaboration is encouraged (e.g. editor suite,
chromium, I believe some wifi drivers
FWIW, current Gnome3 work is done here
http://www.marcuscom.com:8080/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/ports/x11/gnome3/
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/FreeBSD-MATE-GNOME2-Project-News-tp5622414p5716617.html
Sent from the freebsd-chat mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_
Right now, we still don't have Gnome3
in ports, right?
So all hypothetical efforts probably will
go that way... or not at all. -gnome looks
a bit stale.
I know that there was some porting of
gtk3.
You should contact -gnome or bug
author of GhostBSD, maybe he would
like to start working on upd
If you are saying that you are using Mate on FreeBSD, don't hesitate
and make a port :)
About Trinity, they biggest problem is that they want to port
kde3 to qt4, unnecessary imho. They should focus on
legacy desktops + maintain qt33. And they only have 5
contributors.
And attracting rather st
I don't think that there is enough manpower to
support legacy lines.
Trinity
http://www.trinitydesktop.org/
Didn't have much luck.
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/FreeBSD-MATE-GNOME2-Project-News-tp5622414p5716371.html
Sent from the freebsd-chat mailing
