Re: Tired of Hierarchies

2008-05-04 Thread Thierry Thomas
Le Dim 4 mai 08 à 15:49:26 +0200, Rahul Siddharthan [EMAIL PROTECTED] écrivait : On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 5:45 PM, Roopinder Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, May 4, 2008 11:24 am, Rahul Siddharthan wrote: If you want to index your files (metadata, or informative filenames, or

Re: port management practices

2008-04-23 Thread Thierry Thomas
Le Mer 23 avr 08 à 15:24:29 +0200, Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED] écrivait : What I am wondering re the above is how to cope with the ports that allow you to select options, I wouldn't cron this for that reason alone. I could see cronning the retrieval, but not the actual portupgrade. You

Re: Computers and parts to donate...

2007-07-25 Thread Thierry Thomas
Le Mer 25 jul 07 à 17:24:10 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] écrivait : Michael S. Eubanks wrote: I'm just curious if anyone knows of a place that will accept relatively extinct hardware and/or good UNIX starter machines? If not, I'll just wait until I meet someone who wants some

Re: Where software meets hardware..

2007-06-21 Thread Thierry Thomas
Le Jeu 21 jui 07 à 14:33:56 +0200, Oliver Fromme [EMAIL PROTECTED] écrivait : I have a cousin who's taking up a programming course. He doesn't have background with programming nor an in depth understanding of how the computer works. I tried explaining him that it all started with

Re: spamcop now completely broken?

2006-11-19 Thread Thierry Thomas
Le Lun 20 nov 06 à 0:14:28 +0100, Warren Block [EMAIL PROTECTED] écrivait : Is is just me, or has SpamCop become useless? Two weeks ago, they were listing apache.org, now they're listing freebsd.org... Looks like they're blocking mx2, 69.147.83.53. That's the new address since Friday.

Re: Record Uptimes

2006-06-03 Thread Thierry Thomas
Le Sam 3 jui 06 à 6:50:01 +0200, Kevin Brunelle [EMAIL PROTECTED] écrivait : Well, at least that's a rare one... but the power does drive me nuts. It should drive you to ports/sysutils/nut! -- Th. Thomas. ___ freebsd-chat@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: Why is not more FreeBSD software written in C++?

2006-04-15 Thread Thierry Thomas
Le Sam 15 avr 06 à 23:37:26 +0200, Daniel O'Connor [EMAIL PROTECTED] écrivait : A not insignificant reason (IMO) is that C++ is much slower to compile.. Also, gcc didn't use to be (ie when FreeBSD was started) a good C++ compiler. And also /usr/lib/libstdc++* can be removed on small systems.

Re: Google is useless nowadays.

2006-02-04 Thread Thierry Thomas
Le Sam 4 fév 06 à 21:28:15 +0100, Robert Atkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] écrivait : Maybe: freebsd cloop -inurl:cvs or freebsd cloop -cvs or a derivative of that would help to get rid of what you don't want. Or try http://groups.google.com/groups?q=freebsd%20cloop : this thread hits the