On 5/25/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
> On 5/25/07, Daniel O'Connor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Thursday 24 May 2007 23:02, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
>> > > The issue is that the R300 has been supported for a long time,
>> > > while until recently t
Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
On 5/25/07, Daniel O'Connor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thursday 24 May 2007 23:02, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
> > The issue is that the R300 has been supported for a long time,
> > while until recently the R400 was not.
>
> Yes, I'm lucky to have 9550 and 1100 - both of
On 5/25/07, Daniel O'Connor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thursday 24 May 2007 23:02, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
> > The issue is that the R300 has been supported for a long time,
> > while until recently the R400 was not.
>
> Yes, I'm lucky to have 9550 and 1100 - both of which are
> not supported
On Thursday 24 May 2007 23:02, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
> > The issue is that the R300 has been supported for a long time,
> > while until recently the R400 was not.
>
> Yes, I'm lucky to have 9550 and 1100 - both of which are
> not supported by any version of Xorg :-(
If you're running i386 you c
On 5/24/07, Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Andrew Pantyukhin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 5/24/07, Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Thierry Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > My card is a X700Super (commercial name), detected as > > RV410 X700 SE>: i
"Andrew Pantyukhin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 5/24/07, Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Thierry Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > My card is a X700Super (commercial name), detected as > > RV410 X700 SE>: it's a rather cheap card, and I'm not sure that it
> > > is >
On 5/24/07, Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thierry Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> My card is a X700Super (commercial name), detected as RV410 X700 SE>: it's a rather cheap card, and I'm not sure that it
> is > 9500.
It is, the 9500 belongs to the R300 series while the X700
Thierry Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> My card is a X700Super (commercial name), detected as RV410 X700 SE>: it's a rather cheap card, and I'm not sure that it
> is > 9500.
It is, the 9500 belongs to the R300 series while the X700 is an
R400-series chip.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - [EMAI
Le Mer 23 mai 07 à 15:36:49 +0200, Andrew Pantyukhin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
écrivait :
> On 5/23/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Using Xorg 7.2, has anyone tested the 3D performance of radeon cards,
> >series
> >9500 and up? (xorg 6.9 radeon drivers have <1 fps)
>
> Theirry Thom
On 5/23/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Using Xorg 7.2, has anyone tested the 3D performance of radeon cards, series
9500 and up? (xorg 6.9 radeon drivers have <1 fps)
Theirry Thomas has just reported success with x700,
AFAIR. Look through the archives.
Using Xorg 7.2, has anyone tested the 3D performance of radeon cards, series
9500 and up? (xorg 6.9 radeon drivers have <1 fps)
___
freebsd-chat@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-chat
To unsubscribe, send any mai
11 matches
Mail list logo