Re: 3D @ radeon & xorg 7.2

2007-06-19 Thread Andrew Pantyukhin
On 5/25/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > On 5/25/07, Daniel O'Connor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Thursday 24 May 2007 23:02, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: >> > > The issue is that the R300 has been supported for a long time, >> > > while until recently t

Re: 3D @ radeon & xorg 7.2

2007-05-25 Thread deeptech71
Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: On 5/25/07, Daniel O'Connor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thursday 24 May 2007 23:02, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > > The issue is that the R300 has been supported for a long time, > > while until recently the R400 was not. > > Yes, I'm lucky to have 9550 and 1100 - both of

Re: 3D @ radeon & xorg 7.2

2007-05-24 Thread Andrew Pantyukhin
On 5/25/07, Daniel O'Connor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thursday 24 May 2007 23:02, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > > The issue is that the R300 has been supported for a long time, > > while until recently the R400 was not. > > Yes, I'm lucky to have 9550 and 1100 - both of which are > not supported

Re: 3D @ radeon & xorg 7.2

2007-05-24 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On Thursday 24 May 2007 23:02, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > > The issue is that the R300 has been supported for a long time, > > while until recently the R400 was not. > > Yes, I'm lucky to have 9550 and 1100 - both of which are > not supported by any version of Xorg :-( If you're running i386 you c

Re: 3D @ radeon & xorg 7.2

2007-05-24 Thread Andrew Pantyukhin
On 5/24/07, Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: "Andrew Pantyukhin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 5/24/07, Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thierry Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > My card is a X700Super (commercial name), detected as > > RV410 X700 SE>: i

Re: 3D @ radeon & xorg 7.2

2007-05-24 Thread Dag-Erling Smørgrav
"Andrew Pantyukhin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 5/24/07, Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thierry Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > My card is a X700Super (commercial name), detected as > > RV410 X700 SE>: it's a rather cheap card, and I'm not sure that it > > > is >

Re: 3D @ radeon & xorg 7.2

2007-05-24 Thread Andrew Pantyukhin
On 5/24/07, Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Thierry Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > My card is a X700Super (commercial name), detected as RV410 X700 SE>: it's a rather cheap card, and I'm not sure that it > is > 9500. It is, the 9500 belongs to the R300 series while the X700

Re: 3D @ radeon & xorg 7.2

2007-05-24 Thread Dag-Erling Smørgrav
Thierry Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > My card is a X700Super (commercial name), detected as RV410 X700 SE>: it's a rather cheap card, and I'm not sure that it > is > 9500. It is, the 9500 belongs to the R300 series while the X700 is an R400-series chip. DES -- Dag-Erling Smørgrav - [EMAI

Re: 3D @ radeon & xorg 7.2

2007-05-24 Thread Thierry Thomas
Le Mer 23 mai 07 à 15:36:49 +0200, Andrew Pantyukhin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> écrivait : > On 5/23/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Using Xorg 7.2, has anyone tested the 3D performance of radeon cards, > >series > >9500 and up? (xorg 6.9 radeon drivers have <1 fps) > > Theirry Thom

Re: 3D @ radeon & xorg 7.2

2007-05-23 Thread Andrew Pantyukhin
On 5/23/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Using Xorg 7.2, has anyone tested the 3D performance of radeon cards, series 9500 and up? (xorg 6.9 radeon drivers have <1 fps) Theirry Thomas has just reported success with x700, AFAIR. Look through the archives.

3D @ radeon & xorg 7.2

2007-05-23 Thread deeptech71
Using Xorg 7.2, has anyone tested the 3D performance of radeon cards, series 9500 and up? (xorg 6.9 radeon drivers have <1 fps) ___ freebsd-chat@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-chat To unsubscribe, send any mai