On Sat, 29 Jun 2013 16:26:22 +0200
d...@gmx.com wrote:
> Tick, tock.
> ___
> freebsd-chat@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-chat
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
> "freebsd-chat-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Opt o
Tick, tock.
___
freebsd-chat@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-chat
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-chat-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On Wed, 5 Jun 2013 20:18:15 -0400
Joe Altman wrote:
> And FWIW, it's not the community that, AFAICT, arguing against GA.
> It's a few people in that community who, apparently, don't wish to
> use any sort of localhost mechanism to adress the issue. Again, FWIW:
> I would prefer the FBSD project d
At 06:18 PM 6/5/2013, Joe Altman wrote:
Weblog analysis is hard. Google, with its analytics, does it
well. The project needs that analysis.
For what? To market its expensive product?
The fact is that the project does NOT need this analysis,
especially at the cost of
visitors' privacy. It set
On 06/06/2013 02:18, Joe Altman wrote:
you are what you claim others are.
Which is?
And FWIW, it's not the community that, AFAICT, arguing against GA. It's
a few people in that community who, apparently, don't wish to use any
sort of localhost mechanism to adress the issue. Again, FWIW: I wou
On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 08:07:46PM +0200, d...@gmx.com wrote:
>
> 1. I was unable to find any traces of such a discussion.
Then you did not look.
> Apparently, if there was a discussion, it was held between a small,
> closed group.
Small, yes. Closed, not so much.
> People only annoy me when t
On 06/05/2013 16:34, John Baldwin wrote:
There was quite a lively discussion of this
before it was enabled and a summary of the reasons for using it was posted to
announce@ quite a while ago:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-announce/2012-December/001441.html
1. I was unable to find
On Wednesday, June 05, 2013 8:24:04 am d...@gmx.com wrote:
> I am yet to receive a answer from the web master.
>
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-chat/2013-May/006883.html
Your opinion has been noted. There was quite a lively discussion of this
before it was enabled and a summary of
I am yet to receive a answer from the web master.
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-chat/2013-May/006883.html
___
freebsd-chat@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-chat
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "fre
Google and the NSA Connection (short article + 04:38 minutes video)
http://www.blacklistednews.com/Google_and_the_NSA_Connection/26300/0/38/38/Y/M.html
http://www.batr.org/negotium/052913.html (source)
Document of NSA was changed on 2013-05-08 at 15:43 (40336257 bytes)
http://www.nsa.gov/public_i
On Mon, 27 May 2013 18:03:05 +0200
d...@gmx.com wrote:
> On 05/24/2013 01:04, Darren Pilgrim wrote:
> > If you don't want to participate in GA, you can block the related
> > javascript quite easily.
>
> Irrelevant. Most users have no idea how to practically avoid GA, or
> even worse: they do not
OpenBSD is an operating system that focuses on security, and the non-use of GA
on the openbsd.org website reflects this. It has been always thought that
security is also a key point of FreeBSD. For example, the FreeBSD developers
also believe in full disclosures, a (package set) usage reporter
On 05/24/2013 01:04, Darren Pilgrim wrote:
If you don't want to participate in GA, you can block the related javascript
quite easily.
Irrelevant. Most users have no idea how to practically avoid GA, or even worse:
they do not understand the dangers in enriching a terrorist company with lots
On Fri, 24 May 2013 06:15:32 +0930
Mike Trewartha wrote:
> This has already been discussed:
>
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-chat/2012-December/006809.html
I firmly agree with Brett Glass.
Alternatives
http://piwik.org/
http://www.linux.com/learn/tutorials/369515-we
On May 23, 2013 6:04 PM, "Brett Glass" wrote:
>
> At 02:55 AM 5/23/2013, Jayton Garnett wrote:
>
>> Does it really matter?
>
>
> Yes. A lot. FreeBSD should not facilitate violations of privacy or
similar security risks.
>
So I assume you are working on and/or sponsoring code and infrastructure
th
At 02:55 AM 5/23/2013, Jayton Garnett wrote:
Does it really matter?
Yes. A lot. FreeBSD should not facilitate violations of privacy or
similar security risks.
--Brett Glass
___
freebsd-chat@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailma
On 05/23/2013 22:45, Mike Trewartha wrote:
This has already been discussed:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-chat/2012-December/006809.html
Do you read?
On 05/23/2013 10:51, d...@gmx.com wrote:
Several months ago, the FreeBSD web master decided [...], without giving any
response o
This has already been discussed:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-chat/2012-December/006809.html
On 24/05/2013, at 2:15 AM, d...@gmx.com wrote:
> On 05/23/2013 10:55, Jayton Garnett wrote:
>> Does it really matter?
>
> Yes, but you knew that.
>
On 05/23/2013 10:55, Jayton Garnett wrote:
Does it really matter?
Yes, but you knew that.
___
freebsd-chat@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-chat
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-chat-unsubscr...@freeb
Does it really matter?
On 23 May 2013 09:51, wrote:
> Several months ago, the FreeBSD web master decided to cover the main
> FreeBSD web site with Google Analytics, without giving any response or
> respect to critics and concerns raised by the user community, such as
> questioned benefits, public
20 matches
Mail list logo
