On Thursday 27 April 2006 07:03 pm, Francisco Reyes wrote:
> Oliver Fromme writes:
> > (In other words: PAE might enable you to use RAM >= 4 GB,
> > but your processes will still be limited to 32bit address
> > space.)
>
> Thanks for the pointer.
> That is a good reason to go AMD64 if one has apps
Francisco Reyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oliver Fromme writes:
> > (In other words: PAE might enable you to use RAM >= 4 GB,
> > but your processes will still be limited to 32bit address
> > space.)
>
> Thanks for the pointer.
> That is a good reason to go AMD64 if one has apps which w
Francisco Reyes wrote:
Oliver Fromme writes:
(In other words: PAE might enable you to use RAM >= 4 GB,
but your processes will still be limited to 32bit address
space.)
Thanks for the pointer.
That is a good reason to go AMD64 if one has apps which will require
lots of RAM, although I can't
Oliver Fromme writes:
(In other words: PAE might enable you to use RAM >= 4 GB,
but your processes will still be limited to 32bit address
space.)
Thanks for the pointer.
That is a good reason to go AMD64 if one has apps which will require lots of
RAM, although I can't think of any program I
Francisco Reyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oliver Fromme writes:
> > Depending on the board, only 3 to 3.5 GByte will be
> > usable, the rest is used by PCI configuration space.
> >
> > If you need more RAM, you must run 64bit (amd64),
> > and make sure that you don't depend on software th
On Thu, 20 Apr 2006, Francisco Reyes wrote:
Marc G. Fournier writes:
I'm running AMD64 on HP Proliant G4p server with Dual 64bit Xeon CPUs ...
How much Ram Marc?
6G of RAM ... again, note that these are 64bit servers, and I believe
these servers max out at 24G (6x4G DIMMs) ...
Marc
On Thu, 20 Apr 2006, Francisco Reyes wrote:
> > I am using FreeBSD/amd64 on CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.80GHz (2793.02-MHz
> > K8-class CPU)
>
> On a single CPU board or SMP?
4 CPUs
Jeremy C. Reed
echo ':6DB6=88>?;@69876tA=AC8BB5tA6487><' | tr '4-F' 'wu rofIn.lkigemca'
_
Jeremy C. Reed writes:
I am using FreeBSD/amd64 on
CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.80GHz (2793.02-MHz K8-class CPU)
On a single CPU board or SMP?
___
freebsd-chat@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-chat
To unsubsc
Marc G. Fournier writes:
I'm running AMD64 on HP Proliant G4p server with Dual 64bit Xeon CPUs ...
How much Ram Marc?
Wondering at which point it will make sense, for us, to start going above
4GB. In particular if the processes running are close to using all 4GB, then
there is nothing/littl
Francisco Reyes wrote:
Oliver Fromme writes:
Depending on the board, only 3 to 3.5 GByte will be
usable, the rest is used by PCI configuration space.
If you need more RAM, you must run 64bit (amd64),
and make sure that you don't depend on software that
isn't 64bit-clean.
So 4GB and more, req
On Thu, 20 Apr 2006, Francisco Reyes wrote:
> Out of curiosity does FreeBSD AMD64 works on Intel 64 bit chips?
I am using FreeBSD/amd64 on
CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.80GHz (2793.02-MHz K8-class CPU)
(Note that it was a hassle knowing that amd64 was okay.)
Jeremy C. Reed
echo ':6DB6=88>?;@6
On Thu, 20 Apr 2006, Francisco Reyes wrote:
Oliver Fromme writes:
Depending on the board, only 3 to 3.5 GByte will be
usable, the rest is used by PCI configuration space.
If you need more RAM, you must run 64bit (amd64),
and make sure that you don't depend on software that
isn't 64bit-clean.
Oliver Fromme writes:
Depending on the board, only 3 to 3.5 GByte will be
usable, the rest is used by PCI configuration space.
If you need more RAM, you must run 64bit (amd64),
and make sure that you don't depend on software that
isn't 64bit-clean.
So 4GB and more, requires 64bit CPUs?
Out o
Francisco Reyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Our priorities are not that complex...
> 1- It MUST work flawlesly with FreeBSD. (1)
> 2- Dual CPU, 4GB RAM with all 4GB visible(2)
That isn't possible if you need to run 32bit (i386).
Depending on the board, only 3 to 3.5 GByte will be
usable, the r
Matt Olander writes:
OMG! seeecret! Actually, we're almost finished with a new site
design (finally), and that will be a little more clear for those in the
know ;-)
I hope that doesn't orphans FreeBSD users who buy your system. :-)
___
freebsd-c
Francisco Reyes wrote:
Did you used to have a different name.. some 5 or 6 years ago?
I recall having bought a couple of servers and after a year.. I believe
the company got renamed iXsystems..
Haha, yes, we've been through a few ;-)
It'd make a nice chapter in a BSD book one day.
What is t
Matt Olander writes:
*cries* well, there's us (iXsystems), and FreeBSD Systems, and Iron
Systems
Did you used to have a different name.. some 5 or 6 years ago?
I recall having bought a couple of servers and after a year.. I believe the
company got renamed iXsystems..
What is the easiest/fas
Liam J. Foy wrote:
*cries* well, there's us (iXsystems), and FreeBSD Systems, and Iron
Systems, to name a few. Of course, I prefer us! ;-)
cheers,
-matt
Hi Matt,
http://www.ixsystems.com/cgi-bin/store/about.html
Says you use NetBSD. What products is NetBSD used on? I'm just curious:)
On 19 Apr 2006, at 20:34, Matt Olander wrote:
Francisco Reyes wrote:
That was the hardware company David Greenman had.
Did it go under?
Looking for FreeBSD hardware vendors and that would have been a
good one if it still was around. :-(
*cries* well, there's us (iXsystems), and FreeBSD Sys
Francisco Reyes wrote:
That was the hardware company David Greenman had.
Did it go under?
Looking for FreeBSD hardware vendors and that would have been a good one
if it still was around. :-(
*cries* well, there's us (iXsystems), and FreeBSD Systems, and Iron
Systems, to name a few. Of course
That was the hardware company David Greenman had.
Did it go under?
Looking for FreeBSD hardware vendors and that would have been a good one if
it still was around. :-(
___
freebsd-chat@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo
21 matches
Mail list logo
