Re: do we have support for the Beagle Board?

2009-04-14 Thread Duncan Barclay
Chuck Robey wrote: According to what I thought I read, the arm7 has changes from the arm5 it's derived from. Supposed to me 2-3 times more code-efficient? I hope I learn more before I get my toy. Do you have any idea what the FP environment is? softfp? It's a hardware FP

Re: do we have support for the Beagle Board?

2009-04-10 Thread Dag-Erling Smørgrav
Duncan Barclay d...@dmlb.org writes: The DSP is not a Cortex, it's the 64x series of TI DSP. The Cortex is Arm's latest CPU. Arm instruction sets are labeled as ArmV5, V6, V7 etc. Then, Arm develop CPU cores that implement these: ArmV5 ARM9xx such as an Arm926 processor ArmV6

Re: do we have support for the Beagle Board?

2009-04-10 Thread Dag-Erling Smørgrav
Dag-Erling Smørgrav d...@des.no writes: So why didn't they just use a TI DaVinci or DaVinci HD? It's an ARMv5 core and a 64x DSP on a single chip, with something like 2 MB of shared SRAM. ...if I remember correctly; it's been over a year since I last worked on one. DES -- Dag-Erling

Re: do we have support for the Beagle Board?

2009-04-09 Thread Kenneth P. Stox
On Thu, 2009-04-09 at 08:56 +0200, Lars Engels wrote: What is Pandora? Please do not open it to find out. ___ freebsd-chat@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-chat To unsubscribe, send any mail to

do we have support for the Beagle Board?

2009-04-08 Thread Chuck Robey
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I am truly impressed with that new handhelp computer, the Pandora. I read somewhere (I'm trying to find where I saw this) that the Pandora is very compatible with the BeagleBoard. I was just wondering if any of the work being done for the ARM on