Go to http://lt.tar.com/ and see? transcript? of a successful installation of
StarOffice 5.0. It should help you.
ad...@worldbank.org wrote:
I'm running 4.0-current as of late last week, elf kernel.? Everything works
great - no problems.? I understand that the Linux kernel threads stuff is now
On Tue, 16 Feb 1999, Warner Losh wrote:
: Not to stop you in your tracks, but I would really love to see
: somebody (more capable than the PAO people) work out a power
: management architecture for us before we have too many more
: hacks in this area...
I'd have to agree that a unified
:I'm seeing different responses depending on hardware.
:
:On regular Pentium 166 machines, I almost NEVER get
:a panic. On brand-new Pentium II 350s, I get a panic
:every 6-9 hours. This happens when both kernels are
:configured the same for maxusers. It happens when
:both machines are under
Hi folks,
I have the following pertinent options in my kernel config:
options FFS #Fast filesystem
options FFS_ROOT#FFS usable as root device
options MFS #Memory filesystem
options NFS
On Wed, 17 Feb 1999 11:48:15 +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
Is anyone else using the NFS_NOSERVER option successfully?
Bleh, I should have mentioned that the kernel builds fine if I remove
the NFS_NOSERVER option.
Ciao,
Sheldon.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with
who's looked at this.
Tor Egge, he has been very helpful during the development of the code. The
pmap change was a result of discussions with him.
It looks to me that this is serious stuff
spliting the pmap out of the vmspace structure is a big change.
caertainly a logical move but
I've gone through these patches and I can see that they are really needed
for SMP where address spaces are shared.
There are details I didn't get, such as where is the per-processor
pde pointed, (i.e. where is the per processor KVM range) and is there a
single page table for each processor
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Dillon [mailto:dil...@apollo.backplane.com]
:What's the chance that our kernel adaptations for PIIs
:is partly at fault?
:
:-Troy Cobb
: Circle Net, Inc.
: http://www.circle.net
With what config? Have you tried reducing
Try reducing maxusers to 128. If you have mbuf problems, override
NMBCLUSTERS ( making it 4096 or 8192 should be sufficient ). Sometimes
network mbuf problems on heavily loaded machines are due to too-large
default buffer sizes - if net.inet.tcp.sendspace or recvspace is greater
[ CC trimmed ]
tc...@staff.circle.net wrote in message ID
a0cfa284c004d211b7ee0060082f32a412e...@freya.circle.net:
I've had it at MAXUSERS=256 on both the P5 and the P6. The P5 stays
stable, the P6 doesn't. If I reduce MAXUSERS to 128 then these
heavily loaded boxen will fall over due to out
On Wed, Feb 17, 1999 at 06:15:06PM +1030, Greg Lehey wrote:
On Tuesday, 16 February 1999 at 9:24:31 -0800, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
If I have a /etc/defaults/rc.conf, then my /etc/rc.conf won't be consulted.
Wrong. You need to read just a bit FURTHER into that file before
jumping to
Greetings,
I also have a Creative Labs Sound Blaster PCI128 installed, and though I
followed your instructions below I am not havine what I would call
promising results.
At 12:21 PM 1/10/99 +0100, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
you need a -current system with the pcm device, then
I am running
On Tue, 16 Feb 1999, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
I usually keep -O to just '-O' - I had been upping it recently, but then it
started breaking even some of my simple programs, so leasson learn't, it's
staying at just '-O' from now on in... (safety first? :-)
-O2 works fine too. -O3 does not.
cc -c -O -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes
-Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions
-ansi -nostdinc -I- -I. -I../.. -I../../../include -DKERNEL -include
opt_global.h -mno-fp-regs -Wa,-mev56 ../../nfs/nfs_syscalls.c
Julian Elischer said:
On Tue, 16 Feb 1999, Luoqi Chen wrote:
You may try my patch at http://www.freebsd.org/~luoqi, which would allow
linux threads to run on SMP.
I've gone through these patches and I can see that they are really needed
for SMP where address spaces are shared.
I
On Wed, 17 Feb 1999, Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
Amancio Hasty wrote...
SGI is releasing GLX 8)
http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/990216/ca_silicon_2.html
Have Fun,
Amancio
P.S.: If companies start dumping large packages is going to weight us down
:(
Heh. That's
At 8:05 pm -0800 16/2/99, Mike Smith wrote:
[...]
No, -O2 does not work fine; we've seen reports of it breaking things
before.
I've been using -O2 building -current for over a year with no problems. I
haven't dared try it for the kernel though...
--
Bob Bishop (0118) 977 4017
On Tue, Feb 16, 1999 at 12:19:07AM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote:
:maxusers 256
Try reducing maxusers to 128. Another person reported similar behavior
to me and after a bunch of work he tried going back to a basic
distribution -- and everything started working again.
To add
On Wed, Feb 17, 1999 at 08:46:49AM -0500, tc...@staff.circle.net wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Dillon [mailto:dil...@apollo.backplane.com]
:What's the chance that our kernel adaptations for PIIs
:is partly at fault?
:
:-Troy Cobb
: Circle Net, Inc.
Bob Bishop wrote:
At 8:05 pm -0800 16/2/99, Mike Smith wrote:
[...]
No, -O2 does not work fine; we've seen reports of it breaking things
before.
I've been using -O2 building -current for over a year with no problems. I
haven't dared try it for the kernel though...
Lucky you. -O2 *does*
:At 8:05 pm -0800 16/2/99, Mike Smith wrote:
:[...]
:No, -O2 does not work fine; we've seen reports of it breaking things
:before.
:
:I've been using -O2 building -current for over a year with no problems. I
:haven't dared try it for the kernel though...
:
:--
:Bob Bishop (0118) 977
On Thu, 18 Feb 1999, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
Lucky you. -O2 *does* break world for many people. Eventually, it
might break your world too, and there is a great chance you'll first
spam -current before changing -O2 to -O and trying again. Or there
would, if we stopped hitting on this nail. :-)
Matthew Dillon wrote:
I've been using -O2 kernels for over a year. Works fine as far as I
can tell.
I've had a few failures with -O2 ages ago, though I can't guess how long ages
was - I definitely remember tracing one problem down to '-O' vs. '-O2', I
stick to '-0' now
Hello-
I've been trying to get 3.1 or 4.0 to run on a Compaq Professional Workstation
6000 with dual PII-300s, using the built-in symbios 53c875 SCSI controller, and
the built-in ThunderLan ethernet adapter. The machine works perfectly with
2.2.8, but we'd like to get it running 3.1 (or 4.0 if
Hi,
Just fyi, current as of 2pm EST.
Thanks,
John
cc -c -O -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes
-Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions
-ansi -nostdinc -I- -I. -I../.. -I../../../include -DKERNEL -DVM_STACK
-include
On Wed, 17 Feb 1999 19:12:59 EST, John W. DeBoskey wrote:
Just fyi, current as of 2pm EST.
../../nfs/nfs_syscalls.c:92: warning: `nfsrv_zapsock' declared `static' but
never defined
*** Error code 1
I get this when I set ``option NFS_NOSERVER''. If I disable the option,
my kernel
Hi,
I don't control the options used to build the distribution
kernels during a 'make release'. Jordan is responsible for
that.
I don't have any problems building my local kernel since
the only nfs options I have are:
options NFS #Network Filesystem
options
Hi,
On Wed, 17 Feb 1999, Benjamin Lewis wrote:
...
We then tried to boot with the 3.1 and the 4.0 boot floppies. Neither was
able to find the SCSI controller or the ethernet device. Of course, we find
it odd that 2.2.8 found the devices ok, but newer releases do not. As far
as I can tell,
Env:
Yesterday I went to a friends house for installing a box from the freebsd
3.0-release cdrom (I have also the src and obj very current on another cd
to do a quick make installword :-).
He has :
1 hd master (A) + 1 cdrom slave on primary ch.
1 hd master (B) + 1 zip atapi slave on secundary
:Env:
:
:Yesterday I went to a friends house for installing a box from the freebsd
:3.0-release cdrom (I have also the src and obj very current on another cd
:to do a quick make installword :-).
:
:He has :
:1 hd master (A) + 1 cdrom slave on primary ch.
:1 hd master (B) + 1 zip atapi slave on
At 17.49 17/02/99 -0800, you wrote:
:everything was fine after adding a boot config with 1:wd(2,a)kernel
Look at the disklabel for wd2s2. If the 'disk:' field in the label
says wd1 that may be your problem.
I think is our installer that have some problems :-)
Btw I'll check it, but
:Env:
:
:Yesterday I went to a friends house for installing a box from the freebsd
:3.0-release cdrom (I have also the src and obj very current on another cd
:to do a quick make installword :-).
:
:He has :
:1 hd master (A) + 1 cdrom slave on primary ch.
:1 hd master (B) + 1 zip atapi
cc -c -O -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes
-Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions
-ansi -nostdinc -I- -I. -I../.. -I../../../include -DKERNEL -include
opt_global.h -mno-fp-regs -Wa,-mev56 ../../nfs/nfs_syscalls.c
33 matches
Mail list logo
