On Friday, 2nd July 1999, Stephen McKay wrote:
>I have an old 486 here that I thrash to death occasionally. Well, at least
>I try to get it to page to death. I started a make world last week and
>forgot about it.
>
>Today I noticed that it's been stuck for most of the week. Almost everything
>
Thanks.
Brian Fundakowski Feldman _ __ ___ ___ ___ ___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ __ ___ | _ ) __| \
FreeBSD: The Power to Serve!_ __ | _ \._ \ |) |
http://www.FreeBSD.org/ _ |___/___/___/
-- Forwarded message --
Date
Hi Guys,
Lets pick up this discussion on http://www.openldap.org and
the mailing list :
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Tnks!
--
Amancio Hasty
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
> Also, before I removed 3.2 from my system, I made a little cpp hello
> world program and with GCC the binary was 8k. That same program was
> 40k with EGCS. Anyone know why?
Look at the ``ldd'' output. libstdc++ is statically linked if you used
the egcs port (which if you did this on 3.2 you
"Kurt D. Zeilenga" wrote:
> This discussion is diverging a bit from this list's charter. Hence,
> I'll be brief.
>
> Amancio Hasty wrote:
> > True LDAP (v2 or v3) does not provide record locking . Now the question is
> > does Novell's NDS 8 -- a native LDAP v3 -- , Oracle's Directory
> > Server
Luckycasino.com now blocked by spam filters. Sorry, as always, for
the interruption.
- Jordan
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Dear Webmaster,
We are a business conducting business and this is not unsolicited bulk email. We have
purchased your email address from an Internet marketing center. If you do not wish to
receive further notices from Lucky's Casino, please reply to this e-mail and type
"UNSUBSCRIBE" in the sub
On Monday, 5 July 1999 at 15:42:13 -0700, Tom Pavel wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 3 Jul 1999, Peter Wemm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> A few key suggestions for people still along for the ride:
>>
>> 1: When you've got a good running kernel that you're happy with, do yourself
>> a big favour and cop
On Monday, 5 July 1999 at 20:13:57 +0300, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> When I take a closer look at dmesg output I discovered that my k6-II
> reported as "\^M". Maybe it is because I have an very first stepping (I
> bought my CPU shortly after k6-II appeared on market). Maserboard used -
> Tyan Trinity
Steve Price writes:
> }
> +#ifdef __i386__
> sc->wb_btag = I386_BUS_SPACE_IO;
> +#endif
> +#ifdef __alpha__
> + sc->wb_btag = ALPHA_BUS_SPACE_IO;
> +#endif
> #else
> if (!(command & PCIM_CMD_MEMEN)) {
Just a minor comment.. anytime you have something like this, it's
always
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sheldon Hearn writes:
: Haha! The secret to surviving CURRENT without big cojones is to watch
: cvs commit mail very closely.
When one has big cojones, they are a bigger target so it winds up not
helping much :-)
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECT
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bill Paul writes:
: If we're really lucky then some day this will get fixed correctly,
: by somebody who is not me, as I have plenty of other things to keep
: me busy.
I'm working on moderizing the bus space implementation right now. It
will make writing the newcon
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Parag Patel writes:
: Just curious, but is there a reason that these lines aren't simply
:
: sc->wb_btag = BUS_SPACE_IO;
:
: with this macro being set to the correct machine-specific one in some
: appropriate header file? I'm sure I'm missing something...
Y
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Steve Price
writes:
: I wondered that as well. For both the i386 and alpha port
: the definitions end up in /usr/include/machine/bus.h and
: stripping off the arch-specific prefix shows that their value
: is the same.
Because the bus tag isn't guarnateed to be a c
> On Sat, 3 Jul 1999, Peter Wemm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> A few key suggestions for people still along for the ride:
>
> 1: When you've got a good running kernel that you're happy with, do yourself
> a big favour and copy it from /kernel to /kernel.ok or something like that.
> So, when
Parag Patel wrote:
> On Mon, 05 Jul 1999 00:33:57 CDT, Steve Price wrote:
> >+#ifdef __i386__
> > sc->wb_btag = I386_BUS_SPACE_IO;
> >+#endif
> >+#ifdef __alpha__
> >+sc->wb_btag = ALPHA_BUS_SPACE_IO;
> >+#endif
>
> Just curious, but is there a reason that these lines aren't simply
>
>
On Mon, 05 Jul 1999 13:42:39 MST, "Jordan K. Hubbard" wrote:
> I also make this point now and with such force because various signs
> and portents indicate that -current is about to become a dangerous
> place again for awhile, and a lot of people who really don't have the
> cojones to run -curr
On Mon, 5 Jul 1999, Nicolas Blais wrote:
[snip]
> Also, before I removed 3.2 from my system, I made a little cpp hello
> world
> program and with GCC the binary was 8k. That same program was 40k with
> EGCS. Anyone know why?
this is probably caused by the exception handling that is included w
> Hi. I've finally installed FreeBSD 4.0 and to tell you the truth, I'm
> not very impressed. I was expecting some bugs but not like that...
I don't see a problem with FreeBSD 4.0 so much as a problem with
someone jumping beyond their abilities. :)
Please, go back to 3.2-STABLE. 4.0-CURRENT i
This discussion is diverging a bit from this list's charter. Hence,
I'll be brief.
Amancio Hasty wrote:
> True LDAP (v2 or v3) does not provide record locking . Now the question is
> does Novell's NDS 8 -- a native LDAP v3 -- , Oracle's Directory
> Server or Microsoft Active Directory does if th
Hi. I've finally installed FreeBSD 4.0 and to tell you the truth, I'm
not
very impressed. I was expecting some bugs but not like that...
Most of my stuff compiles great with EGCS except all my shared libraries
that uses libtool like
jpeglib and giflib.
They both use libtool which for some odd r
Again, I think it is appropiate to use LDAP for configuring
network services such as DHCPD , DNS , PPP, etc and to
a limited extend sendmail -- see sendmail's modification to
support user's delivery address :
http://www.stanford.edu/~bbense/Inst.html and actually
We can ask the Standford
Sorry, I pooched it. I'll fix.
On Mon, 5 Jul 1999, Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
> Vallo Kallaste wrote...
> > Hello
> >
> > I just cvsupped the src-all, built the world, kernel and noticed that:
> >
> > changing root device to da0s1a
> > da0 at ncr0 bus 0 target 5 lun 0
> > da0: Fixed Direct Acc
Vallo Kallaste wrote...
> Hello
>
> I just cvsupped the src-all, built the world, kernel and noticed that:
>
> changing root device to da0s1a
> da0 at ncr0 bus 0 target 5 lun 0
> da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device
> da0: 40.000MB/s transfers (20.000MHz, offset 16, 16bit), Tagged Queueing E
As Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai wrote ...
> * Mark Huizer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [990705 02:47]:
> > >
> > > I did change the cvsup server some time ago, but I'm now back at
> > > cvsup.nl.FreeBSD.org
> > >
> > hey! that's my queue! when did it start to happen?
> > If it was last week, then there might h
Hello
I just cvsupped the src-all, built the world, kernel and noticed that:
changing root device to da0s1a
da0 at ncr0 bus 0 target 5 lun 0
da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device
da0: 40.000MB/s transfers (20.000MHz, offset 16, 16bit), Tagged Queueing Enabled
da0: 254MB (8910423 512 byte sect
Of all the gin joints in all the towns in all the world, Steve Price had
to walk into mine and say:
> [trimmed -alpha from cc: list to keep the cross posting
> police from coming after me :)]
>
> On Mon, 5 Jul 1999, Parag Patel wrote:
>
> # On Mon, 05 Jul 1999 00:33:57 CDT, Steve Price wrote:
[trimmed -alpha from cc: list to keep the cross posting
police from coming after me :)]
On Mon, 5 Jul 1999, Parag Patel wrote:
# On Mon, 05 Jul 1999 00:33:57 CDT, Steve Price wrote:
# >+#ifdef __i386__
# > sc->wb_btag = I386_BUS_SPACE_IO;
# >+#endif
# >+#ifdef __alpha__
# >+sc->wb_btag
On Mon, 05 Jul 1999 00:33:57 CDT, Steve Price wrote:
>+#ifdef __i386__
> sc->wb_btag = I386_BUS_SPACE_IO;
>+#endif
>+#ifdef __alpha__
>+ sc->wb_btag = ALPHA_BUS_SPACE_IO;
>+#endif
Just curious, but is there a reason that these lines aren't simply
sc->wb_btag = BUS_SPACE_IO;
w
"Mark J. Taylor" wrote:
> You didn't include the FreeBSD version in your email. I'd bet that
> it is earlier than 3.2. Get the 3.2 boot floppy and see what it
> indicates (ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/3.2-RELEASE/floppies/kern.flp).
>
> This buglet was supposedly corrected in January.
Unf
When I take a closer look at dmesg output I discovered that my k6-II
reported as "\^M". Maybe it is because I have an very first stepping (I
bought my CPU shortly after k6-II appeared on market). Maserboard used -
Tyan Trinity 100AT (VIA MP3 chipset).
Any ideas?
Timecounter "i8254" frequency 11
At 02:29 PM 7/4/99 -0700, Amancio Hasty wrote:
>Record locking and batch requests is a bit more difficult to solve perhaps
>someone in the list can shed light into this problem for instance does
>LDAPv3 provide such mechanism?
LDAP (v2 or v3) does not provide record locking, client/server
transac
It seems Peter Wemm wrote:
> > Well, CAM & ATAPI is "fairly" easy, the only problem being all the
> > little details that are different enough to make it non-trivial to
> > maintain. I once sat down and tried to get all the details on how
> > the CCB's where different, and decided that I wouldn't
Soren Schmidt wrote:
> It seems Nick Hibma wrote:
> > > > I should have said "known bad configuration". I know Søren's ATA
> > > > driver supports UDMA on the Aladdin, but I don't have the luxury of
> > > > expendable file systems, so I don't use it. I also think it's the
> > > > wrong directi
It seems Nick Hibma wrote:
> > > I should have said "known bad configuration". I know Søren's ATA
> > > driver supports UDMA on the Aladdin, but I don't have the luxury of
> > > expendable file systems, so I don't use it. I also think it's the
> > > wrong direction to go off in; if we're going
> > I should have said "known bad configuration". I know Søren's ATA
> > driver supports UDMA on the Aladdin, but I don't have the luxury of
> > expendable file systems, so I don't use it. I also think it's the
> > wrong direction to go off in; if we're going to totally rewrite our
> > IDE dr
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> gene writes:
: This sounds old, I know zip about Perl, I think the latest is like
: 5.005_04, but make in the /usr/ports/lang/perl5 directory gives me:
You might want to try removing the perl port you have installed on
your system, and then trying the make world ag
It seems Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> "Brian F. Feldman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On 4 Jul 1999, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> > > Depends on your motherboard. Try to just disable UDMA66 first. If that
> > > doesn't help, or if you have a "known bad" chipset (e.g. AcerLabs
> > > Aladdin), di
"Brian F. Feldman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 4 Jul 1999, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> > Depends on your motherboard. Try to just disable UDMA66 first. If that
> > doesn't help, or if you have a "known bad" chipset (e.g. AcerLabs
> > Aladdin), disable UDMA completely in the BIOS setup utilit
39 matches
Mail list logo
