On Wed, Jul 07, 1999 at 11:46:27AM +0200, Ladavac Marino wrote:
Something like this should do it. It may be nice to also allow the
authname/authkey to be specified on the command line so that they
can easily be set in rc.conf, by hand or by sysinstall.
[ML] You do not really
-Original Message-
From: Josef Karthauser [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 1999 1:22 PM
To: Ladavac Marino
Cc: Brian Somers; Mark Thomas; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wayne
Self
Subject: Re: userland ppp - startup
On Wed, Jul 07, 1999 at 12:20:35PM +0200,
On 07-Jul-99 Ladavac Marino wrote:
It does :) That said doesn't sysinstall using ppp to do a net
install?
How does it setup username/password, etc.
[ML] It asks for it in a dialog box, IIRC (never having used it
:)
sysinstall drops you into ppp and you have to use the term
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
I just cvsup'd today hoping that all the NFS fixes that went in
recently would have alleviated (sp?) the hangs I've been getting
while building things in ports for the last couple of months.
It used to be that just NFS would hang, now it seems to crash the
entire
On Wed, 7 Jul 1999, Peter Wemm wrote:
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
I just cvsup'd today hoping that all the NFS fixes that went in
recently would have alleviated (sp?) the hangs I've been getting
while building things in ports for the last couple of months.
It used to be that just NFS
On Thu, 8 Jul 1999, Peter Wemm wrote:
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
On Wed, 7 Jul 1999, Peter Wemm wrote:
attempting to compile xscreensaver has triggered it twice in a row
/usr/ports is mounted off "server" (a freebsd -current box) and
doing the make will kill the machine.
On Wed, 7 Jul 1999, Josef Karthauser wrote:
Hmm... how to do this then? The sppp setup code in rc.* allows
username/password to be specified. Can it be done in the environment
then? (If rc.conf is visable then the sppp config gives usernames and
passwords away as it stands today.)
On Thu, 8 Jul 1999, Peter Wemm wrote:
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
On Wed, 7 Jul 1999, Peter Wemm wrote:
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
I just cvsup'd today hoping that all the NFS fixes that went in
recently would have alleviated (sp?) the hangs I've been getting
while building
Hello,
todays current breaks in build of libgcc
=== gnu/lib/libgcc
c++ -O2 -mpentium -fpcc-struct-return -ffast-math -fno-strength-reduce -malign-jumps=4
-malign-loops=4 -malign-functions=4
-I/usr/src/gnu/lib/libgcc/../../../contrib/egcs/gcc/cp/inc -nostdinc++ -c
On Mon, Jul 05, 1999 at 08:59:41PM +0100, Brian Somers wrote:
[-current cc'd - please don't make this a big thread !]
/etc/start_if.tun0 with an ``exec ppp ...''. This starts things up
at the correct point.
However, maybe it's time for a knob in rc.conf ? Something like
On Wed, 7 Jul 1999, Keith Stevenson wrote:
On Wed, Jul 07, 1999 at 01:19:02PM -0700, Alex Zepeda wrote:
On Wed, 7 Jul 1999, Ladavac Marino wrote:
[ML] You do not really want these on the command line for
everyone to see with ps. (nor in rc.conf for everyone to see with e.g.
I can very reliable reproduce a process getting stuck in this state. The
box it is running on is a k6-2 400 with 128MB of ram and 500MB of swap.
When compiling mysql322-server with the compiler option of '-O2' or
'-O3', the build gets up to sql_yacc.cc. It churns on this file and
goes into the
On Wed, 7 Jul 1999 Keith Stevenson wrote:
Why is rc.conf readable by world?!
Why not?
What about that:
spppconfig_isp0="authproto=chap myauthname=foo myauthsecret='top secret'
hisauthname=some-gw hisauthsecret='another secret'"
Boris
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Boris Staeblow
To
Since we have increased the hard page table allocation for the kernel to
1G (?) we should be able to safely increase VM_KMEM_SIZE_MAX. I was
thinking of increasing it to 512MB. This increase only effects
large-memory systems. It keeps them from locking up :-)
Anyone have
:
: Yes, I do - at least with the 512MB figure. That would be half of the 1GB
:KVA space and large systems really need that space for things like network
:buffers and other map regions.
:
:-DG
:
:David Greenman
:Co-founder/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project - http://www.freebsd.org
On Wed, Jul 07, 1999 at 10:02:44PM +0100, Brian Somers wrote:
Ha, and you thought it'd be straight forward ;^P
;b just time mate :) I'm off on holiday on Saturday, until the next Sunday.
Day off work on the Monday. If I don't get it tied up before I go I'll finish
it on my return.
Joe
--
On Wed, Jul 07, 1999 at 01:00:46PM +0100, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote:
On 07-Jul-99 Ladavac Marino wrote:
sysinstall drops you into ppp and you have to use the term
command to log in manually.
Ahha, it's not quite as bad as that. sysinstall asks you some questions
and writes a
Jason Thorpe wrote:
On Wed, 7 Jul 1999 17:03:16 -0700 (PDT)
Matthew Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If this could result in a smaller overall structure, it may be worth i
t.
To really make the combined structure smaller we would also have to
pair-down the fields in
:On Thu, 08 Jul 1999 08:36:19 +0800
: Peter Wemm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:
: Out of curiosity, how does it handle the problem of small 512 byte
: directories? Does it consume a whole page or does it do something smarter?
: Or does the ubc work apply to read/write only and the filesystem
On Thursday, 8 July 1999 at 9:26:09 +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote:
David Greenman wrote:
Yes, I do - at least with the 512MB figure. That would be half of the 1GB
KVA space and large systems really need that space for things like network
buffers and other map regions.
Matthew Dillon [EMAIL
we already use the gs register for SMP now..
what about the fs register?
I vaguely remember that the different segments could be used to achieve
this (%fs points to user space or something)
julian
On Wed, 7 Jul 1999, Matthew Dillon wrote:
:Why not put the kernel in a different address
uh...
[phaser.whistle.com] 536 man 9 finetimer
No entry for finetimer in section 9 of the manual
On Thu, 8 Jul 1999, Seigo Tanimura wrote:
Another idea has come to my mind...
pca(4) currently uses acquire_timer0(), which changes the timer
frequency directly, breaking finetimer(9). I
On Wed, 7 Jul 1999 19:06:48 -0700 (PDT),
Julian Elischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
julian uh...
julian [phaser.whistle.com] 536 man 9 finetimer
julian No entry for finetimer in section 9 of the manual
Sorry, finetimer(9) is the new timer implemented in my latest midi driver.
You can read the
-current kernel as of 1700 PST (or thereabouts):
spec_strategy+0x31: movl0x28(%eax), eax
Note: %eax = 0
Traceback:
--
spec_strategy(c3d27dd0,c3d27dac,c01cbe1,c3d27dd0,c3d27ddc) at spec_strategy+0x31
On Thu, 8 Jul 1999, Seigo Tanimura wrote:
On Wed, 7 Jul 1999 19:06:48 -0700 (PDT),
Julian Elischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
julian uh...
julian [phaser.whistle.com] 536 man 9 finetimer
julian No entry for finetimer in section 9 of the manual
Sorry, finetimer(9) is the new timer
On Wed, 7 Jul 1999, Mike Smith wrote:
Why is rc.conf readable by world?!
Why not?
What reason would the rest of the "world" have to read rc.conf? It could
only create a possible security risk.
This is shabby reasoning. rc.conf contains public system configuration
data,
26 matches
Mail list logo
