early panics broken

1999-08-29 Thread Bruce Evans
panic() no longer works when called early. E.g., after booting with -d, typing `panic' at the debugger prompt produces no output and hangs. This may be because panic() now depends on uninitialized event handlers. Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-c

Re: 4.0-CURRENT SMP crash with vinum raid-5 and softupdates

1999-08-29 Thread Bernd Walter
On Mon, Aug 30, 1999 at 03:58:16PM +0930, Greg Lehey wrote: > > Yes, this is the same thing. Until Parag came along, I was beginning > to think it was a problem with your hardware :-( Yes - I would have done tests with a host at work to check if it's reproduceable with another hardware - now I t

Re: 4.0-CURRENT SMP crash with vinum raid-5 and softupdates

1999-08-29 Thread Greg Lehey
On Monday, 30 August 1999 at 16:17:15 +0930, Greg Lehey wrote: > On Monday, 30 August 1999 at 8:06:03 +0200, Bernd Walter wrote: >> On Sun, Aug 29, 1999 at 10:59:22PM -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote: >>> >>> This is definitely a pbuf. Did you apply the patches Greg emailed? >> >> Not yet. >> I w

Re: 4.0-CURRENT SMP crash with vinum raid-5 and softupdates

1999-08-29 Thread Matthew Dillon
:>> :>> What's a pbuf? :> :> Sorry, it isn't a pbuf. : :OK. But what is a pbuf? I've never heard that term before. A pbuf is a 'physical buffer'. Specifically, it is a struct buf structure used by low level device drivers to issue their own I/O. pbuf's are used by a number o

Re: 4.0-CURRENT SMP crash with vinum raid-5 and softupdates

1999-08-29 Thread Greg Lehey
On Monday, 30 August 1999 at 8:06:03 +0200, Bernd Walter wrote: > On Sun, Aug 29, 1999 at 10:59:22PM -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote: >> >> This is definitely a pbuf. Did you apply the patches Greg emailed? > > Not yet. > I will do it today. Wait a while. I'll send you another couple as well.

Re: 4.0-CURRENT SMP crash with vinum raid-5 and softupdates

1999-08-29 Thread Greg Lehey
On Sunday, 29 August 1999 at 23:36:24 -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote: }, b_vnbufs = { ... (kgdb) >>> >>> This is definitely a pbuf. >> >> What's a pbuf? > > Sorry, it isn't a pbuf. OK. But what is a pbuf? I've never heard that term before. > Hmm. You are allocat

Re: 4.0-CURRENT SMP crash with vinum raid-5 and softupdates

1999-08-29 Thread Matthew Dillon
:>> }, :>> b_vnbufs = { :>> ... :>> (kgdb) :> :> This is definitely a pbuf. : :What's a pbuf? Sorry, it isn't a pbuf. Hmm. You are allocating and initializing a struct buf yourself? That could cause long term problems but is neither here nor there at the moment, we'll deal wi

kernel build fail- /pci/if_xl.c:133: miibus_if.h: No such file or directory

1999-08-29 Thread FreeBSD mailing list
Subject says it all. make depend fails with: ../../pci/if_xl.c:133: miibus_if.h: No such file or directory mkdep: compile failed -skots To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: 4.0-CURRENT SMP crash with vinum raid-5 and softupdates

1999-08-29 Thread Greg Lehey
On Sunday, 29 August 1999 at 22:59:22 -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote: > >> (kgdb) target remote /dev/cuaa2 >> Remote debugging using /dev/cuaa2 >> 0x0 in ?? () >> (kgdb) bt >> #0 0x0 in ?? () >> #1 0xc017228f in biodone (bp=0xc09ebd80) at ../../kern/vfs_bio.c:2580 >> #2 0xc0123db6 in dadone (perip

Re: 4.0-CURRENT SMP crash with vinum raid-5 and softupdates

1999-08-29 Thread Greg Lehey
On Monday, 30 August 1999 at 7:53:12 +0200, Bernd Walter wrote: > On Sun, Aug 29, 1999 at 04:48:32PM -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote: >> : >> :How similar? The trap above is extremely bad; it looks like a return >> :on a corrupted stack or a jump through a null function vector. >> : >> :Make very su

Re: 4.0-CURRENT SMP crash with vinum raid-5 and softupdates

1999-08-29 Thread Greg Lehey
On Sunday, 29 August 1999 at 23:15:47 -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote: >> Greg's debugging this on the machine here at the moment, which is >> crashing the same way in what appears to be the same place. >> >> If anyone else wants to take a crack it, the magic vinum debug number >> needed is 328 and no

Re: 4.0-CURRENT SMP crash with vinum raid-5 and softupdates

1999-08-29 Thread Greg Lehey
On Sunday, 29 August 1999 at 23:09:48 -0700, Parag Patel wrote: > On Sun, 29 Aug 1999 22:59:22 PDT, Matthew Dillon wrote: >> >>This is definitely a pbuf. Did you apply the patches Greg emailed? >>They will panic the machine earlier while it is still in the correct >>stack frame, allow

Re: 4.0-CURRENT SMP crash with vinum raid-5 and softupdates

1999-08-29 Thread Matthew Dillon
:Greg's debugging this on the machine here at the moment, which is :crashing the same way in what appears to be the same place. : :If anyone else wants to take a crack it, the magic vinum debug number :needed is 328 and not 324. : :So far Greg's discovered that the field is correctly set a little

Re: 4.0-CURRENT SMP crash with vinum raid-5 and softupdates

1999-08-29 Thread Parag Patel
On Sun, 29 Aug 1999 22:59:22 PDT, Matthew Dillon wrote: > >This is definitely a pbuf. Did you apply the patches Greg emailed? >They will panic the machine earlier while it is still in the correct >stack frame, allowing Greg to track down where the I/O initiation came >from. Greg'

Re: 4.0-CURRENT SMP crash with vinum raid-5 and softupdates

1999-08-29 Thread Bernd Walter
On Sun, Aug 29, 1999 at 10:59:22PM -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote: > > This is definitely a pbuf. Did you apply the patches Greg emailed? Not yet. I will do it today. -- B.Walter COSMO-Project http://www.cosmo-project.de [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usergroup

Re: 4.0-CURRENT SMP crash with vinum raid-5 and softupdates

1999-08-29 Thread Matthew Dillon
:(kgdb) target remote /dev/cuaa2 :Remote debugging using /dev/cuaa2 :0x0 in ?? () :(kgdb) bt :#0 0x0 in ?? () :#1 0xc017228f in biodone (bp=0xc09ebd80) at ../../kern/vfs_bio.c:2580 :#2 0xc0123db6 in dadone (periph=0xc0882c80, done_ccb=0xc09bd200) at :../../cam/scsi/scsi_da.c:1294 :#3 0xc011f

Re: 4.0-CURRENT SMP crash with vinum raid-5 and softupdates

1999-08-29 Thread Bernd Walter
On Sun, Aug 29, 1999 at 04:48:32PM -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote: > : > :How similar? The trap above is extremely bad; it looks like a return > :on a corrupted stack or a jump through a null function vector. > : > :Make very sure that your vinum kld is in sync with your kernel. > > This looks

Re: $FreeBSD tag confusion

1999-08-29 Thread Kevin Street
John Polstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Kevin Street wrote: > Expansion of RCS keywords occurs on check_out_, not on checkin. In > other words, your cvs is responsible for expanding them. > > > If my cvs needs to do it, then I presume > > I need to add some options to my CVSROOT to make t

Re: $FreeBSD tag confusion

1999-08-29 Thread John Polstra
Kevin Street wrote: >>Are you getting a copy of CVSROOT? > > yes...as part of src-all, but it's not used as *my* CVSROOT. Aha. > Let's go back to the beginning here. Is my cvs responsible for > expanding the $FreeBSD$ tags, or are they supposed to arrive in my cvs > repository already

Re: $FreeBSD tag confusion

1999-08-29 Thread Kevin Street
Rodney W. Grimes writes: >What verion of the cvs binary are you running (cvs -v)? Concurrent Versions System (CVS) 1.10 `Halibut' (client/server) >Are you getting a copy of CVSROOT? yes...as part of src-all, but it's not used as *my* CVSROOT. Let's go back to the beginning here. Is

Re: $FreeBSD tag confusion

1999-08-29 Thread Rodney W. Grimes
> John Polstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > The tags are expanding just fine up here in Seattle. :-) > > > > I wish you would have included the rest of the output from your cvs > > status command. It sounds a lot like your source tree was checked > > out with "-ko". That would show up in

Re: $FreeBSD tag confusion

1999-08-29 Thread Kevin Street
John Polstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The tags are expanding just fine up here in Seattle. :-) > > I wish you would have included the rest of the output from your cvs > status command. It sounds a lot like your source tree was checked > out with "-ko". That would show up in the "Sticky Ta

Re: $FreeBSD tag confusion

1999-08-29 Thread John Polstra
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Kevin Street <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm confused by what I'm seeing in my source tree after the > Id->FreeBSD tag change. I cvsup the repository and then update my > source tree locally. Most of the files in the tree now have an > unexpanded $FreeBSD$ tag i

RE: Mucho Bandwith

1999-08-29 Thread Brandon Gale
Damned Canadians! > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Josh Tiefenbach > Sent: Saturday, August 28, 1999 2:04 AM > To: Amancio Hasty > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Mucho Bandwith > > > > http://abcnews.go.com/sections/tech/Cutting

Re: Mucho Bandwith

1999-08-29 Thread Jason George
[full snippage about CA*net 3] I took this from the CA*net 3 FAQ - http://www.canarie.ca/frames/startnetworks_e.html The last update to the FAQ was in Aug98, but I don't believe there have been any technical modifications, in terms of peering or advertising routes in and out of the test netw

Re: 4.0-CURRENT SMP crash with vinum raid-5 and softupdates

1999-08-29 Thread Greg Lehey
On Sunday, 29 August 1999 at 18:08:33 -0700, Parag Patel wrote: > On Sun, 29 Aug 1999 16:48:32 PDT, Matthew Dillon wrote: > >>This looks like an indirect call through a NULL function pointer. > > Wow - I'm impressed! You really know your kernel debugging! :) It is a > null-pointer dereferenc

Re: 4.0-CURRENT SMP crash with vinum raid-5 and softupdates

1999-08-29 Thread Parag Patel
On Sun, 29 Aug 1999 16:48:32 PDT, Matthew Dillon wrote: >This looks like an indirect call through a NULL function pointer. Wow - I'm impressed! You really know your kernel debugging! :) It is a null-pointer dereference that's crashing it. Here's the gdb stack back-trace: (gdb) bt #0 0x0

Re: buildworld failing

1999-08-29 Thread David Scheidt
On Sun, 29 Aug 1999, David Scheidt wrote: > I just cvsuped an hour ago, my buildworld fails with this: I removed my /usr/src and checkedout of my local repository, and now the build gets past this. I don't do anything on this /usr/src/ except build from it, so I have no idea how it got corrupt

buildworld failing

1999-08-29 Thread David Scheidt
I just cvsuped an hour ago, my buildworld fails with this: ===> lib/libc "/usr/src/lib/libc/../libc/sys/Makefile.inc", line 9: Could not find /usr/src/lib/libc/../../sys/sys/syscall.mk make: fatal errors encountered -- cannot continue *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/lib. *** Error code 1 Stop

$FreeBSD tag confusion

1999-08-29 Thread Kevin Street
I'm confused by what I'm seeing in my source tree after the Id->FreeBSD tag change. I cvsup the repository and then update my source tree locally. Most of the files in the tree now have an unexpanded $FreeBSD$ tag in them (ie. no version info). Files which have been changed since the new tag we

Re: 4.0-CURRENT SMP crash with vinum raid-5 and softupdates

1999-08-29 Thread Matthew Dillon
:> On Sun, Aug 29, 1999 at 12:43:13PM -0700, Parag Patel wrote: :> > :> > -ddb crash output- :> > :> > Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode :> > mp_lock = 0303; cpuid = 3; lapic.id = 0200 :> > fault virtual address = 0x0 :> > fault code = supervisor read,

Re: NFSv3 on freebsd<-->solaris

1999-08-29 Thread Matthew Dillon
:Note that the application can do lseek on the directory, that is change :the next cookie used. It is used by seekdir(). (And, of course, the :application may lseek to anywhere it like, and the filesystem will have :to deal with the bogus cookie. :... : :> * an NFS readdir rpc is stateless a

Re: 4.0-CURRENT SMP crash with vinum raid-5 and softupdates

1999-08-29 Thread Parag Patel
On Sun, 29 Aug 1999 15:24:32 PDT, Mike Smith wrote: > >Make very sure that your vinum kld is in sync with your kernel. Just verified that it is in sync. I had done a "cvsup" of the entire - -CURRENT tree, "make buildworld", "make installworld", build and install a new kernel, and run mergemaster

Re: 4.0-CURRENT SMP crash with vinum raid-5 and softupdates

1999-08-29 Thread Mike Smith
> On Sun, Aug 29, 1999 at 12:43:13PM -0700, Parag Patel wrote: > > > > -ddb crash output- > > > > Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode > > mp_lock = 0303; cpuid = 3; lapic.id = 0200 > > fault virtual address = 0x0 > > fault code = supervisor read, page no

Re: NFSv3 on freebsd<-->solaris

1999-08-29 Thread Dmitrij Tejblum
> It isn't possible to do this and still remain synchronized. If the > directory changes on the server, the client has no way of knowing > whether a cookie corresponds to the same file if you always return > a valid response. This breaks the protocol. > > A local filesystem

Re: 4.0-CURRENT SMP crash with vinum raid-5 and softupdates

1999-08-29 Thread Bernd Walter
On Sun, Aug 29, 1999 at 12:43:13PM -0700, Parag Patel wrote: > > -ddb crash output- > > Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode > mp_lock = 0303; cpuid = 3; lapic.id = 0200 > fault virtual address = 0x0 > fault code = supervisor read, page not present > inst

Re: Built-in linker library search paths

1999-08-29 Thread John Birrell
On Sun, Aug 29, 1999 at 11:00:17AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > > I'd like to remove the search paths altogether, leaving the gcc > > LIB_SPEC and LD_LIBRARY_PATH environment variable to get the /right/ > > path all the time. > > Can you post a patch first? IIRC jdp wanted to be more "pure" wit

PPPD+PAM

1999-08-29 Thread Andrea Franceschini
Hi! I'm trying to use pppd coupled with PAM. I'm using pppd 2.3.9 compiled with USE_PAM options ,and ,as far as i can see ,the pppd side seem to work fine,but when i try to use the PAM side i got this: - Aug 29 18:22:06 volcano pppd[1643]: rcvd [PAP AuthReq id=0x1 user="*" passwo rd="*"] Aug

Re: NFSv3 on freebsd<-->solaris

1999-08-29 Thread Matthew Dillon
:> From rfc1813: :> :> If the :> server detects that the cookie is no longer valid, the :> server will reject the READDIR request with the status, :> NFS3ERR_BAD_COOKIE. : :I propose that our cookies are always valid, just like directory :offsets after getdirentries() sysca

Re: Mucho Bandwith

1999-08-29 Thread The Hermit Hacker
On Sat, 28 Aug 1999, Josh Tiefenbach wrote: > > http://abcnews.go.com/sections/tech/CuttingEdge/canadanet990827.html > > > > Hmmm... I wonder what would happen if ftp.freebsd.org was moved to CA*Net3 8) > > Significantly less than what its doing now. > > What the article fails to mention, is t

4.0-CURRENT SMP crash with vinum raid-5 and softupdates

1999-08-29 Thread Parag Patel
Hello. I'm not sure which list this should go to as I'm not sure what caused this fault. Unfortunately, I can't get a trace out of ddb - it simply faults again, so advice on how to debug it or what to look at would be much appreciated. The machine is dead right now, and I'll leave it that way

Re: breakage in this morning's build

1999-08-29 Thread Chris D. Faulhaber
On Mon, 30 Aug 1999, Mike Muir wrote: > Pascal Hofstee wrote: > > > I am suffering from the exact same problem here as well ... (tried about 4 > > times now ... without success) > > Mines a little (little) different: > > install -c -s -o root -g wheel -m 555 rm /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/bin > rm:

Re: breakage in this morning's build

1999-08-29 Thread Eugene M. Kim
Me too! Mine goes like: cc -O6 -m486 -pipe -Wall -Wall -Wformat -I/usr/obj/pubfs/1/root/world/src/tmp/usr/include -static -o rm rm.o stat_flags.o install -c -s -o root -g wheel -m 555 rm /usr/obj/pubfs/1/root/world/src/tmp/bin rm: /usr/obj/pubfs/1/root/world/src/bin/rm: Operation not suppo

Re: breakage in this morning's build

1999-08-29 Thread Mike Muir
Pascal Hofstee wrote: > I am suffering from the exact same problem here as well ... (tried about 4 > times now ... without success) Mines a little (little) different: install -c -s -o root -g wheel -m 555 mv /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/bin /usr/obj/usr/src/bin/mv created for /usr/src/bin/mv cd /usr/

Re: NFSv3 on freebsd<-->solaris

1999-08-29 Thread Dmitrij Tejblum
[sorry for some delay...] Doug Rabson wrote: > > I think we should not ever reject a client's cookie. Consider a local > > program that scan the directoty with the getdirentries() syscall. The > > offset in the directory is essentially the cookie that would be sent to > > an NFS client. But we

Re: breakage in this morning's build

1999-08-29 Thread David O'Brien
> cc -O -pipe -Wall -Wformat -I/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/include -static -o rm rm.o >stat_flags.o > install -C -c -s -o root -g wheel -m 555 rm /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/bin > rm: /usr/obj/usr/src/bin/rm: Undefined error: 0 > *** Error code 1 I'll look in to it. CVSup'ing is going to take a li

Re: Built-in linker library search paths

1999-08-29 Thread David O'Brien
> I'd like to remove the search paths altogether, leaving the gcc > LIB_SPEC and LD_LIBRARY_PATH environment variable to get the /right/ > path all the time. Can you post a patch first? IIRC jdp wanted to be more "pure" with ld.so finding shared libs. Many didn't like the more "pure" searching.

Re: breakage in this morning's build

1999-08-29 Thread Pascal Hofstee
On Sun, 29 Aug 1999, Randy Bush wrote: > install -C -c -s -o root -g wheel -m 555 mv /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/bin > /usr/obj/usr/src/bin/mv created for /usr/src/bin/mv > cd /usr/src/bin/rm; /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/bin/make -DWORLD -DNOINFO -DNOMAN >-DNOPIC -DNOPROFILE -DNOSHARED -D_BUILD_TOOLS cl

PPPD 2.3.9 + PAM

1999-08-29 Thread Andre
Hi! I'm trying to use pppd coupled with PAM. I'm using pppd 2.3.9 compiled with USE_PAM options ,and ,as far as i can see ,the pppd side seem to work fine,but when i try to use the PAM side i got this: - Aug 29 18:22:06 volcano pppd[1643]: rcvd [PAP AuthReq id=0x1 user="*" password="*"] Aug

breakage in this morning's build

1999-08-29 Thread Randy Bush
install -C -c -s -o root -g wheel -m 555 mv /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/bin /usr/obj/usr/src/bin/mv created for /usr/src/bin/mv cd /usr/src/bin/rm; /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/bin/make -DWORLD -DNOINFO -DNOMAN -DNOPIC -DNOPROFILE -DNOSHARED -D_BUILD_TOOLS cleandepend; /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/bin/make

Heads up: 3Com XL driver converted to miibus

1999-08-29 Thread Bill Paul
I just committed changes to if_xl to make it use the miibus support instead of its own MII support code (which I ripped out with much gusto). I've tested this with a 3c905, 3c905B, 3cSOHO100-TX Office Connect and a 3c905C and it works fine for me, however Murphy's Law dictates that I may have go

Re: LINT trouble...

1999-08-29 Thread Nick Hibma
Sorry about that. You are right. Some confusion here on what sources I was compiling with. I had fixed the problem in my sources. A cvs diff does not show the difference against HEAD but current version of file. Cheers, Nick On Sun, 29 Aug 1999, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > These are current

Re: No longer able to rip CD data under -current.

1999-08-29 Thread Bruce Evans
>>Nope, it still occurs. You're definitely in the right ballpark >>though since I added some printfs and it's this check: >> >> } else if (ssp->dss_secshift != -1) { >> if (bp->b_bcount & (ssp->dss_secsize - 1)) >> goto bad_bcount; >> >>Which is now failing.

Re: LINT trouble...

1999-08-29 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
These are current sources. This patch fixes the problem for me: Index: usbdi_util.c === RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/dev/usb/usbdi_util.c,v retrieving revision 1.10 diff -u -r1.10 usbdi_util.c --- usbdi_util.c1999/08/29 01:

Re: RealTek 8139 problems

1999-08-29 Thread D. Rock
Bruce Evans schrieb: > > >Under normal Circumstances, the communication is Ok between all three > >machines, but sometimes the ethernet interface in the main machine > >(the 8139) wedges up. I cannot ping any other host. The only solution > >is taking the interface down and up again: > > It hang

Re: LINT trouble...

1999-08-29 Thread Nick Hibma
Please retry with current sources. I can' t reproduce the problem, but I remember the error message, and having fixed it. Nick On Sun, 29 Aug 1999, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > schizo# !! > make > cc -c -O -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes >-Wmissing-prototypes -

Re: No longer able to rip CD data under -current.

1999-08-29 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <532.935919508@localhost>, "Jordan K. Hubbard" writes: >> Trouble could be if ripit picks up from stat(2) before >> it opens the device, we don't know the underlying blocksize >> until after open, floppy drives for instance support many >> different sectorsizes. > >Sorry for the confusi

Re: No longer able to rip CD data under -current.

1999-08-29 Thread Jordan K. Hubbard
> Trouble could be if ripit picks up from stat(2) before > it opens the device, we don't know the underlying blocksize > until after open, floppy drives for instance support many > different sectorsizes. Sorry for the confusion - I'm not even using ripit to test now, I'm simply putting an audio C

Re: No longer able to rip CD data under -current.

1999-08-29 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
Trouble could be if ripit picks up from stat(2) before it opens the device, we don't know the underlying blocksize until after open, floppy drives for instance support many different sectorsizes. What is the name of the port you're using ? In message <409.935917817@localhost>, "Jordan K. Hubbar

Re: No longer able to rip CD data under -current.

1999-08-29 Thread Jordan K. Hubbard
> > This could be another si_bsize casualty. > > Try this patch Nope, it still occurs. You're definitely in the right ballpark though since I added some printfs and it's this check: } else if (ssp->dss_secshift != -1) { if (bp->b_bcount & (ssp->dss_secsize - 1))

LINT trouble...

1999-08-29 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
schizo# !! make cc -c -O -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -ansi -nostdinc -I- -I. -I../.. -I../../../include -DKERNEL -include opt_global.h -elf ../../dev/usb/usbdi_util.c In file inc

Re: gdb weirdness

1999-08-29 Thread Greg Lehey
On Sunday, 29 August 1999 at 10:46:33 +0200, Pascal Hofstee wrote: > On Sun, 29 Aug 1999, Greg Lehey wrote: > >>> I seem to having some weird problems using GDB on 4.0-CURRENT >>> 27for (j = 1; j <= 31; j++) { >>> (gdb) >>> 28 temp = wmalloc(sizeof(ADay)); >>> (gdb) print

Re: gdb weirdness

1999-08-29 Thread Pascal Hofstee
On Sun, 29 Aug 1999, Greg Lehey wrote: > > I seem to having some weird problems using GDB on 4.0-CURRENT > > 27for (j = 1; j <= 31; j++) { > > (gdb) > > 28 temp = wmalloc(sizeof(ADay)); > > (gdb) print j > > $1 = -1077947156 > Does it do this without the -O flag? It ma

Re: No longer able to rip CD data under -current.

1999-08-29 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
This could be another si_bsize casualty. Try this patch Index: subr_diskslice.c === RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/kern/subr_diskslice.c,v retrieving revision 1.69 diff -u -r1.69 subr_diskslice.c --- subr_diskslice.c1999/08/28 14

Re: gdb weirdness

1999-08-29 Thread Greg Lehey
On Sunday, 29 August 1999 at 10:37:32 +0200, Pascal Hofstee wrote: > > I seem to having some weird problems using GDB on 4.0-CURRENT > > I am getting things like the following: > > 27for (j = 1; j <= 31; j++) { > (gdb) > 28 temp = wmalloc(sizeof(ADay)); > (gdb) print j >

gdb weirdness

1999-08-29 Thread Pascal Hofstee
I seem to having some weird problems using GDB on 4.0-CURRENT I am getting things like the following: 27for (j = 1; j <= 31; j++) { (gdb) 28 temp = wmalloc(sizeof(ADay)); (gdb) print j $1 = -1077947156 I checked this on a 3.2-STABLE system and it really ought to sho

No longer able to rip CD data under -current.

1999-08-29 Thread Jordan K. Hubbard
This worked just fine with -current as of a week ago, and I've changed nothing else (the hardware is the exact same). Now I get the following when I attempt to mpegify one of my audio CDs with "ripit" dscheck: b_bcount 512 is not on a sector boundary (ssize 2048) dscheck: b_bcount 512 is not on

Weird new SCSI diagnostics in -current

1999-08-29 Thread Jordan K. Hubbard
I'm noticing some new output. What does it mean and is it going to stay there? :-) - Jordan ahc0: irq 16 at device 4.0 on pci2 ahc0: aic7850 SBLKCTL = 0x0 SSTAT0 = 0x0 SFUNCT = 0x0 Single Channel A, SCSI Id=7, 3/255 SCBs ahc0: Host Adapter Bios disabled. Using default SCSI device parameters f

Re: $FreeBSD-knowledgable mergemaster available

1999-08-29 Thread Mark Murray
> I have some other changes planned so I'm not going to re-roll the port > yet, but between now and then I've put up a version of mergemaster that > knows about the $FreeBSD tags at > http://freebsd.simplenet.com/mergemaster-1.25. Hi Fearture request; _please_ make it configurable for tho