$B:EL2=Q9V=,2q$N$*CN$i$;(B
$BFMA3$N%a!<%kBgJQ<:Ni$$$?$7$^$9!#$4ITMW$N>l9g$O!"$*?M$NFyBN$H@:?@$r%3%s%H%m!<%k$9$k!"$9$P$i$7$$(B
$BFC&Gd$bNx0&$b@.8y=PMh$k$h$&$K$J$j$^$9!#(B
$B;d6&$NAO;O&Gd$G6l$7$s$G$$$kJ}!"(B
$B?M4V4X78$GG:$s$G$$$kJ}!"(B
$B$<$R$3$N9V=,2q$rhttp://www.hypno-college.com/
> DUL, while I'm not sure whether we should take this to -chat or not since
> we are now getting into noise on the -current list, is also a good thing.
> simply because noone on a dialup has reason to be sending mail directly to
> me, they should be sending it through thier ISP's mail servers.
T
On Fri, Sep 24, 1999 at 08:43:37AM -0700, Darryl Okahata wrote:
> "Zach N. Heilig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The application for the tests is mpg123.
> > test mp3 playing time: 373 seconds.
> [ ... ]
> > 1) No Optimization
> >225.08 real 224.30 user 0.23 sys
>
Tom,
Thank you very much. I feel like an idiot, for not having contemplated the
possibility of the problem being the driver for the sis6326. After erasing
everything that might have anything to do with X11 or Window managers or
libraries, I decided as a last resort to substitute the SiS-6326 th
At 12:11 AM 9/25/99 +, you wrote:
>This morning I made world, updated XFree86 and kde, which didn´t seem to
>be a problem until I started X and nowI get revers Icon's - silhouettes
>on the kde background. I get no text but a block where the text is and
>the mouse will often change to a block.
At 10:59 PM 9/24/99 +0200, Wilko Bulte wrote:
>As Gary Schrock wrote ...
> > all mail would still have to go through the local isp's. Personally, I
> > would immediately unsubscribe to any isp that decided this was acceptable
> > behavior on their part. I use the mail server at work for all my o
[subject updated]
On 24-Sep-99 Oliver Fromme wrote:
> Hm, that variant does not display the directory names at all.
> I'd like to propose the following variant. It's a bit longer
> than my first proposal, but just as efficient (maybe even more
> efficient, because it doesn't have to fork two gre
I noticed a little quirk in the pcm driver -- it is reversing the channels
in my sb16! The first couple times I play a certain mp3 that starts out
(normally) in the left channel, it plays correctly in the left channel.
Then suddenly it will switch, and start out in the right channel. The
mixer sti
I understand the ISP's POV here, but I have legitimate reasons to telnet
to port 25 on various machines (most of them administered by me), and
I'd never dream of using an ISP that would stop me from doing so.
--
Ben Rosengart
UNIX Systems Engineer, Skunk Group
StarMedia Network, Inc.
To Unsu
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Pat Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you use sendmail, this is pretty trivial, its a slight modification to
> the original RBL check :
There's a nice patch for the sendmail 8.9.3 that allows you to
specify multiple blacklists easily (e.g., both RBL and DUL).
On Friday, 24 September 1999 at 16:36:54 -0400, Brad Chisholm wrote:
> I'm having a problem where the "vinum start" command crashes my system.
> This happens regardless of whether it's being issued during bootup via
> /etc/rc or from the command line on a running system.
>
> Interestingly, however
This morning I made world, updated XFree86 and kde, which didn´t seem to
be a problem until I started X and nowI get revers Icon's - silhouettes
on the kde background. I get no text but a block where the text is and
the mouse will often change to a block. I have never seen anything like
it. I h
>
> I just ran across this:
>
> Debugger("isp_attach")
> Stopped at Debugger+0x37: movl$0,in_Debugger
> db> cont
> whoa, other_cpus: 0x0002, stopped_cpus: 0x
> panic: stop_cpus() failed
> mp_lock = 0002; cpuid = 0; lapic.id =
> Automatic reboot in 15 seconds -
If you use sendmail, this is pretty trivial, its a slight modification to
the original RBL check :
# DNS based IP address spam lists
R$* $: $&{client_addr}
R$-.$-.$-.$-$: $(host $4.$3.$2.$1.rbl.maps.vix.com. $:
$1.$2.$3.$4 $)
R$-.$-.$-.$-$: $(host $4.$3
I totally agree with this, while it doesn;t stop all spam (and some has to
be added manually to my own lists) I've dramatically cut down on spam to
my machines.
DUL, while I'm not sure whether we should take this to -chat or not since
we are now getting into noise on the -current list, is also a
Warner Losh wrote in list.freebsd-current:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Matthew D. Fuller" writes:
> : OK:
> : #!/bin/sh
> : (cvs status | grep '^File:' | grep -v 'Status: Up-to-date$') 2> /dev/null
> ^^ -q
Hm, that variant does not display the directory names at all.
I'd like to
As Gary Schrock wrote ...
> At 03:00 AM 9/24/1999 -0700, you wrote:
> >Another thing that ISP coulds start doing (we are in process with
> >this now, but on a monitoring only basis, instead of a deny we
> >just log them) is to block all outbound from AS tcp 25 setup packets.
>
> Hmm, maybe I'm in
I just ran across this:
Debugger("isp_attach")
Stopped at Debugger+0x37: movl$0,in_Debugger
db> cont
whoa, other_cpus: 0x0002, stopped_cpus: 0x
panic: stop_cpus() failed
mp_lock = 0002; cpuid = 0; lapic.id =
Automatic reboot in 15 seconds - press a key on the c
Ben Smithurst writes:
> Bruce Albrecht wrote:
>
> > Non-authoritative answer:
> > zuhause.mn.org preference = 150, mail exchanger = minuet.skypoint.net
> > zuhause.mn.org preference = 100, mail exchanger = 205.215.217.178
>
> "205.215.217.178." almost certainly does not have an address
Darryl Okahata wrote in list.freebsd-current:
> "Zach N. Heilig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The application for the tests is mpg123.
> > test mp3 playing time: 373 seconds.
> [ ... ]
> > 1) No Optimization
> >225.08 real 224.30 user 0.23 sys
> [ ... ]
At 11:50 AM 9/24/99 -0700, Jonathan M. Bresler wrote:
> insert plug for the FreeBSDcon talk "Stopping Spam--Five Years
>in the Trenches" by Jonathan M Bresler ;P
But what about "Stopping chat on technical mailing lists..." by ?. :-)
Kurt
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTE
> Kenneth Culver writes:
>
> >I reinstalled -current today, and for some reason there is an extra device
> >generating interrupts. When I do a systat -vm 1 I find that there is a
> >device called rtc at irq8 generating 128 interrupts. What is it? I didn't
> >configure it, and it wasn't there befo
On Thu, 23 Sep 1999, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> You need to find and fix what ever it is that is not dieing when being
> told to die. Your work around is a bandaid that only hides the real
> problem, which is probably a bug some place in something. amd and NFS
> are good first conidates. Just w
ive prompt, it works properly with no crash.
I'm currently running on a snap built this morning (0924), but it was
also happening on a snap from 0914.
Crash info, vinum config, and disk info are below. Let me know if I
can provide any additional information.
Thanks,
Brad
# uname -a
FreeBSD
According to John Polstra:
> Strange. I use the RBL on my mail server here, but it really doesn't
> accomplish much. In the past 8 days it has blocked only 3 distinct
Same here. The DUL is much more effective than the RBL. I'll probably use the
RSS too (with monitoring ofc ourse).
--
Ollivier
According to Bruce Albrecht:
> zuhause.mn.org preference = 150, mail exchanger = minuet.skypoint.net
> zuhause.mn.org preference = 100, mail exchanger = 205.215.217.178
^^^
This is plainly wrong. You're not allowed to put IP addres
: I would immediately unsubscribe to any isp that decided this was acceptable
: behavior on their part. I use the mail server at work for all my outgoing
: mail. Why? Because the machine is lightly loaded and I don't have to
: worry about my mail getting lost in the depths of my isp's mail s
Bruce Albrecht wrote:
> Non-authoritative answer:
> zuhause.mn.org preference = 150, mail exchanger = minuet.skypoint.net
> zuhause.mn.org preference = 100, mail exchanger = 205.215.217.178
"205.215.217.178." almost certainly does not have an address (A)
record. Mail exchangers must be host na
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Luoqi Chen writes:
>> Kenneth Culver writes:
>>
>> >I reinstalled -current today, and for some reason there is an extra device
>> >generating interrupts. When I do a systat -vm 1 I find that there is a
>> >device called rtc at irq8 generating 128 interrupts. What i
> > > I agree.
> > >
> > > > Your work also has a serious security concern if it allows this you to
> > > > directly attatch to it's port 25.
> > >
> > > No it doesn't, but you do bring up another good point why not to use the
> > > ISP's mail server. Security. I don't want email to bounce on
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Kenneth Culver writes:
>I reinstalled -current today, and for some reason there is an extra device
>generating interrupts. When I do a systat -vm 1 I find that there is a
>device called rtc at irq8 generating 128 interrupts. What is it? I didn't
>configure it, and
I reinstalled -current today, and for some reason there is an extra device
generating interrupts. When I do a systat -vm 1 I find that there is a
device called rtc at irq8 generating 128 interrupts. What is it? I didn't
configure it, and it wasn't there before.
Kenneth Culver
To Unsubscribe: s
Hi, there.
> We wrote experimental ACPI driver for 4.0-CURRENT.
This was just one week work so its functionallity is very very poor :-)
but I think it is good idea to start with this for developping ACPI
driver for FreeBSD because it is enough small to understand it.
If someone already started
>
> One of us, at least, evidently.
>
> How much mail does the use of the MAPS DUL reject?
varies sharply from day to day. since 8/31 dul has rejected
93 connection attempts. map has rejected 361 connection attempts.
>
> How much of that do you think is worth rejecting?
>
> > would immediately unsubscribe to any isp that decided this was acceptable
> > behavior on their part.
I agree.
> Your work also has a serious security concern if it allows this you to
> directly attatch to it's port 25.
No it doesn't, but you do bring up another good point why not to use t
> > I agree.
> >
> > > Your work also has a serious security concern if it allows this you to
> > > directly attatch to it's port 25.
> >
> > No it doesn't, but you do bring up another good point why not to use the
> > ISP's mail server. Security. I don't want email to bounce on your box
> > a
> At 03:00 AM 9/24/1999 -0700, you wrote:
> >Another thing that ISP coulds start doing (we are in process with
> >this now, but on a monitoring only basis, instead of a deny we
> >just log them) is to block all outbound from AS tcp 25 setup packets.
>
> Hmm, maybe I'm interpreting this wrong (I h
> [This thread is off topic, but ... ]
> On 24 September 1999 at 3:00, "Rodney W. Grimes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Another thing that ISP coulds start doing (we are in process with
> > this now, but on a monitoring only basis, instead of a deny we
> > just log them) is to block all outbound
>
> Strange. I use the RBL on my mail server here, but it really doesn't
> accomplish much. In the past 8 days it has blocked only 3 distinct
> spam e-mails, and that's typical. Yet I still receive an average of
> 5-10 spam mails in my mailbox every day. (*Must* *stop* *fist* *of*
> *death*!)
At 03:00 AM 9/24/1999 -0700, you wrote:
>Another thing that ISP coulds start doing (we are in process with
>this now, but on a monitoring only basis, instead of a deny we
>just log them) is to block all outbound from AS tcp 25 setup packets.
Hmm, maybe I'm interpreting this wrong (I hope so), but
> > > would immediately unsubscribe to any isp that decided this was acceptable
> > > behavior on their part.
>
> I agree.
>
> > Your work also has a serious security concern if it allows this you to
> > directly attatch to it's port 25.
>
> No it doesn't, but you do bring up another good poin
> >From: "Rodney W. Grimes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Date: Fri, 24 Sep 1999 03:00:55 -0700 (PDT)
>
> >Another thing that ISP coulds start doing (we are in process with
> >this now, but on a monitoring only basis, instead of a deny we
> >just log them) is to block all outbound from AS tcp 25 setup p
>
> Non-authoritative answer:
> zuhause.mn.org preference = 150, mail exchanger = minuet.skypoint.net
> zuhause.mn.org preference = 100, mail exchanger = 205.215.217.178
postfix does not like your numeric MX record
Sep 24 01:35:46 hub postfix/smtp[77991]: warning: valid_hostname:
nume
< said:
> The point is that it _does_ hurt. Anything above -O3 is _likely_ to
> have bugs.
And more to the point: the FreeBSD Project will not support those who
compile their kernel or world with anything other than the default
optimization settings and compilers.
-GAWollman
--
Garrett A. Woll
> These days the RBL is more of a preventative measure than a blocking
> measure. It has already forced most open relays to tighten up.
I'll go with that.
The DUL stops _huge_ amounts of "drive-by" spam, though...
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
To Unsubscr
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Matthew D. Fuller" writes:
: OK:
: #!/bin/sh
: (cvs status | grep '^File:' | grep -v 'Status: Up-to-date$') 2> /dev/null
^^ -q
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Mark Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The RBL is great! There is a teensy bit of colateral damage, but not
> so much that I worry about it. Here in ZA, our USP traffic provider
> (Teleglobe) uses RBL, thus absolving us of the responsibility. Since
> we starte
> About the only positive thing I have to say about the DUL is that Vix
> stated that entries are placed on it at the request of the custodians of
> the netblock in question.
This is a very positive thing about the DUL; ISP co-operation.
This implies that said ISP's are also prepared to provide a
"Zach N. Heilig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The application for the tests is mpg123.
> test mp3 playing time: 373 seconds.
[ ... ]
> 1) No Optimization
>225.08 real 224.30 user 0.23 sys
[ ... ]
> 2) -O3 -mcpu=i486 -march=i486 -fomit-frame-pointer -fschedule-i
[This thread is off topic, but ... ]
On 24 September 1999 at 3:00, "Rodney W. Grimes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Another thing that ISP coulds start doing (we are in process with
> this now, but on a monitoring only basis, instead of a deny we
> just log them) is to block all outbound from AS tc
At 10:35 AM 9/24/1999 -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
>Our outbound smarthost smtp server is carefully monitor, has never lost
>a single mail message, and screaming fast at getting email out. After
>all we also run commercial opt-in bulk emailing for large clients and
>we do know how to get 100's
< said:
> Your work also has a serious security concern if it allows this you to
> directly attatch to it's port 25. Can you say firewall circumvention...
What firewall?
If Gary's employer is at all like the shop I help run, there are none.
-GAWollman
--
Garrett A. Wollman | O Siem / We ar
On Fri, Sep 24, 1999 at 09:22:05AM -0500, Bruce Albrecht wrote:
> I know this is not -current related, but then, neither is the thread
> on hub.freebsd.org refusing DUL origin messages.
>
> I have a DSL line with static IP, and all my FreeBSD mailing lists are
> sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] There
The following is from BUGTRAQ. There's a fix for -stable, though there
is none for -current. Is -current vulnerable?
Regards, Phone: (250)387-8437
Cy Schubert Fax: (250)387-5766
Open Systems Group Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ITSD
I know this is not -current related, but then, neither is the thread
on hub.freebsd.org refusing DUL origin messages.
I have a DSL line with static IP, and all my FreeBSD mailing lists are
sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] There are two DNS MX records for
zuhause.mn.org, one at preference 100 with my
>From: "Rodney W. Grimes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Fri, 24 Sep 1999 03:00:55 -0700 (PDT)
>Another thing that ISP coulds start doing (we are in process with
>this now, but on a monitoring only basis, instead of a deny we
>just log them) is to block all outbound from AS tcp 25 setup packets.
Not
On Thu, Sep 23, 1999 at 10:57:07AM -0400, Luke wrote:
> I have -03 -mpentium -fomit-frame-pointer and the only inexpicable
> problem I have is I cant compile groff with more than -O for some reason.
> Other than that make world and make release have worked many times.
> I wonder does any
For those who don't know the acronymns RBL, DUL, etc... (like me a few
minutes ago :-), they are:
RBL Realtime Blackhole List
TSI Transport Security Initiative
DUL Dial-up User List
RSS Relay Spam Stopper.
More information can be found at the site: http://maps.vix.com/.
Regards
> Do you know about the RBL? How do you feel about it? We are using
> it via DNS and BGP on a test basis right now.I have had legitimate
> important mail blocked at Freebsd.org due to the source being on the
> RBL, but that is a price I am willing to pay.
The RBL is great! There is a teensy
On Thu, 23 Sep 1999, Kip Macy wrote:
>
> In three places in your code you do the following or something similar:
>ptr = (CORE_ADDR) cached_pthread.nxt;
>
> struct pthread has no member nxt in either -current or -stable
> and your patch did not add it to pthread_private.h
> What did you mean
> > How much mail does the use of the MAPS DUL reject?
I think they meant to ask ``how much SPAM mail does ...''
>
> Virtually none. The idea is that dial-up users use their own ISP's
> smarthosts, in which case the ISP can nail them if they are spammers,
> and I don't get their spam if they g
On Fri, Sep 24, 1999 at 12:08:10PM +0900, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
> The point is that it _does_ hurt. Anything above -O3 is _likely_ to
> have bugs.
I am forced to agree about the fact that optimisation is traditionally
buggy :)
I tried to optimize my system with -O3 and -pipe. So I build myself
"Daniel C. Sobral" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > But specifying something too high (-O99) doesn't hurt - I'm using -O6 for
> > gcc 2.95.1 (which, by the way, compiles almost everything in 3.3-RELEASE
> > and 4.0-CURRENT, the only thing still troubling me with it
http://phk.freebsd.dk/tty
This patch clears the way for removing a number of fields in struct
cdevsw:
d_stop moved to struct tty.
d_reset unused.
d_devtotty linkage now provided by dev_t->si_tty.
Once this patch is in, these fields will be removed
Oliver Fromme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The gcc optimizer is traditionally buggy. I wouldn't trust a
> system compiled with anything more than -O (especially on
> production servers). The higher optimization levels don't
> provide much of a speed improvement anyway, sometimes they make
> t
>
> For now, you could remove the IDE devices from the config file,
> until this gets fixed. Ideally, the boot blocks/loader should be
> taught to boot from something other than wd() or da().
The loader groks this already; there's some missing glue in the kernel
that Poul has already worked ou
> After doing a cvsup yesterday evening i can't seem to boot on my
> raid cotroller using the same kernel config.
>
> Is -current probing hardware i a different way now or ??
This is a consequence of a defect in the way that the ida driver works,
and new code which resorts the disk drivers (so
67 matches
Mail list logo
