In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Warner Losh writes:
Not all will agree with this, and it is a change from the past so
there needs to be a sysctl to control this. And given that it is a
radical change from the past, it needs to default to open.
Now, I can't tell if you wore the security-master
Warner Losh wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Poul-Henning Kamp writes:
: Warner ?
[.. reasons for and against ..]
Not all will agree with this, and it is a change from the past so
there needs to be a sysctl to control this. And given that it is a
radical change from the past, it needs
On Wed, 24 Nov 1999, Doug Rabson wrote:
We need to put audit tags into the source tree when a file is audited.
That allows the diffs to be audited later which should be a smaller job
and then the audit tag slides forward.
Not to interrupt in the middle of this discussion but you
hi,
MM I have been charged with the duty of ensuring that FreeBSD gets a
MM security audit that has the credibility of OpenBSD's.
What's going on with FreeBSD Auditing Project
(http://www.FreeBSD.org/auditors.html) ? Is it still alive ?
I think this task is task of this project members. Or
At 1:41 AM -0500 1999/11/24, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote:
Our code doesn't run an a system _anything_ like that.
That may well be true today, however as FreeBSD gets more widely
ported to other platforms, and as the "native" platforms it runs on
progress, this might change in the
Sørens new ATA driver can handle all IDE disks as far as has been
tested now, but it doesn't provide bad sector remapping which is
needed for ESDI and ST-506 disks.
Having two drivers fight for the same class of drivers is a rather
messy process, and it complicates the code a fair bit, not to
Mark Murray wrote:
I'm not sure how to fix this problem. Unlike our other build tools,
perl is not designed to be able to be cross-built: It builds bits
of itself and assumes they can be safely executed to build other bits.
Perl is hugely fragile; cross-building it is a big PITA. If
David Scheidt wrote:
On Tue, 23 Nov 1999, David O'Brien wrote:
Thanks to Marcel's latest Makefile.inc1 changes (1.92), a -current
buildworld running on an older -current system now progresses much
further - in fact it now completes :-).
Actually, I've been seeing just the
Firstly there is some threads discussion going on in -arch so
I'm going to really reply to this over there..
This is just redirector mail
julian
On Mon, 22 Nov 1999, Jason Evans wrote:
Walnut Creek has hired me as a full time employee to work primarily on
improving and expanding FreeBSD's
"Rodney W. Grimes" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It's not so much that they where ``allowed'' to do it, it is more the
matter that they where never directly served with legal papers from USL/Novell
to cease all use of Net/2. Nor did they ever enter into any agreement,
that I am aware
Here is how i compiled XFree86 today (an additonal file for
/usr/ports/x11/XFree86/patches):
http://es-i2.fernuni-hagen.de/~jfh/FreeBSD_Documentation/node7.html
--
Fritz Heinrichmeyer mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FernUniversitaet Hagen, LG ES, 58084 Hagen (Germany)
tel:+49 2331/987-1166
Buildworld of today current is broken due to
importing of ip_filter's header files with ioctls which
in turn broke building 'usr.bin/kdump'.
It seems to me that 'mkioctls' script in
'kdump' is "over-automated" - it build the list of the
'ioctl_includes' 'grepping' through the
On Wed, Nov 24, 1999 at 09:58:51AM +0200, John Hay wrote:
Well the original line is plain wrong if Brian's patch is being used,
because there message is a pointer and the size of a pointer is 4.
Yes, yes, yes. Warner and I are *not* that stupid WRT C. We were both
commenting on the
On Tue, 23 Nov 1999 23:33:14 -0500 (EST), Brian Fundakowski Feldman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
#define SNPARGS(buf, len) buf + len, sizeof(buf) len ? sizeof(buf) - len : 0
char action2[32], proto[47], name[18], fragment[17];
/* Print command name */
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Poul-Henning Kamp writes:
: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Warner Losh writes:
:
: Not all will agree with this, and it is a change from the past so
: there needs to be a sysctl to control this. And given that it is a
: radical change from the past, it needs to
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Peter Wemm writes:
: For example, in "workstation" mode, the reasonable default is "open",
: because typically there is one user on the box (other than root) and that
: person has root access. Excessive hiding info from that user just means
: that they'll have to use
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Alexey Zelkin writes:
: What's going on with FreeBSD Auditing Project
: (http://www.FreeBSD.org/auditors.html) ? Is it still alive ?
: I think this task is task of this project members. Or will be ;-)
Went gangbusters for a short while. Everybody was jazzed. Parts
I will admit that I have had odd behaviours with threads in developing
Lyris on FreeBSD that I have not seen on Solaris, NT, or Linux. I will
see things like what appears to be the thread scheduler stop scheduling
threads and just do a busy wait. I have not tracked it down any further
for
I've never done this myself, but I've always been under the impression that
sizeof(*buf) would work for dynamically allocated buffers.
sizeof() is an operator whose value is determined at compile time.
sizeof(*buf) gives the size of what buf points to. This would be `1' if
buf were a char*,
| sizeof() is an operator whose value is determined at compile time.
| sizeof(*buf) gives the size of what buf points to. This would be `1' if
| buf were a char*, or `4' if buf were an int* [on the i386].
Ahh, so I've probably seen this concept used only on structures then.
--
Dan Moschuk
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Warner Losh writes:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Warner Losh writes:
: sef has sent me patches that I've not had a chance to review that
: appear to implement this.
Actually, these patches do something else. My mistake for reading
them before caffeine.
So please
On Tue, 23 Nov 1999, David O'Brien wrote:
Anyone have any ideas whats going on here?
Yep. ;-)
yacc: e - line 30 of "c-parse.y", syntax error
%expect 51
^
*** Error code 1
The problem is rev 1.92 of src/Makefile.inc1. With that change, the
tools needed to build GCC aren't
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Poul-Henning Kamp writes:
: So please explain the logic you want implemented once people have
: stopped haggeling about it, it is rather trivial.
OK. I'll likely state what I'd like to see as a patch.
: I pressume we want the same policy for /proc/*/cmdline as for
On Wed, Nov 24, 1999 at 01:31:44PM +, Nick Hilliard wrote:
Why do we need to smite the Linux database servers? With threads in their
current state they already outperform Linux's native threads by ~50x for
things like sending mail. I would assume that the differences in database
I still hear reports of sporadic calcru() warnings.
If any of you see these, could you try to see if they correlate
to the uptime of the machine in question ?
--
Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member
[EMAIL PROTECTED] "Real hackers run -current on their laptop."
Hi,
I have an unconventional setup at home, my PC and an little 386/40 w/o
NPU and disk that is routing my net over an ISDN line with i4b
to the world.
(the router is because there are no free slots anymore in the PC to put
the ISDN card in, it is an oldish dual P100 EISA/PCI machine running
Hi,
At 8:00 pm +0100 24/11/99, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
I still hear reports of sporadic calcru() warnings.
If any of you see these, could you try to see if they correlate
to the uptime of the machine in question ?
Nov 23 00:03:35 bludnok /kernel: [boot]
Nov 24 09:02:06 bludnok /kernel:
Holm Tiffe writes:
| Is an NFS root supported in -current ?
| How is the syntax to set the rootdevice ?
| How about /boot/loader and friends - and etherboot ?
| (the port is outdated, it references etherboot-2.4.5.tar.gz
| and no one has this old file anymore, current is 2.4.10)
Yes it is
I got a few calcru() warnings on a dual Pentium-III Xeon system. It had been
up for around 9 or 10 days or so; I've since rebooted it. Specific
configuration
available if you need it.
louie
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of
In the last episode (Nov 23), Lyndon Nerenberg said:
After you verify that this change isn't going to break things that
assume they can see the *argv list via ps(1). I.e. lightning bolts
that do 'kill -MUMBLE `ps -ax|grep foo`'. Which may not be elegant
style, but sometimes is the
Warner Losh wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Peter Wemm writes:
:
: In a dedicated server role, again it might be appropriate to default
: it to "open" (dedicated server being something like a squid box),
: again there will be a couple of sysadmin type users or people who
: have to
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
I still hear reports of sporadic calcru() warnings.
If any of you see these, could you try to see if they correlate
to the uptime of the machine in question ?
Should they start or stop when a machine has been running a while? I see
neither (negative calcru notices
Jason,
On Mon, Nov 22, 1999 at 06:52:20PM -0800, Jason Evans wrote:
Walnut Creek has hired me as a full time employee to work primarily on
improving and expanding FreeBSD's threads support. This is very exciting
to me, and I hope my work will be of benefit the FreeBSD community.
That's
On 24-Nov-99 Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
I still hear reports of sporadic calcru() warnings.
If any of you see these, could you try to see if they correlate
to the uptime of the machine in question ?
I have had them for Seti@Home occasionally. The system hadn't been up for more
than 24
At 8:03 AM + 11/24/99, Brian Somers wrote:
This was discussed close to death before the changes were committed,
and the current behaviour (restricted access) has been agreed by
general consensus to be the most appropriate.
My reading of the thread was ``I'm going to cache ps args to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
*) Lacking interfaces, such as pthread_cancel() (mentioned specifically in
PR bin/7587) need to be implemented.
It's good news for me.
I hope to port xmovie -- QuickTime movie Player for Linux to FreeBSD.
But I can not compile it under FreeBSD, because it's
On Thu, Nov 25, 1999 at 10:38:56AM +1030, Daniel O'Connor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 24-Nov-99 Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
I still hear reports of sporadic calcru() warnings.
If any of you see these, could you try to see if they correlate
to the uptime of the machine in question ?
Is this SMP ?
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], N writes:
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
I still hear reports of sporadic calcru() warnings.
If any of you see these, could you try to see if they correlate
to the uptime of the machine in question ?
Should they start or stop when a machine has been
38 matches
Mail list logo
