Hello,
I'm rebuilding my -Current box.
it's been reinstalled anew from the FreeBSD 4.0-19991229-CURRENT
snapshot.
I have on another box the full repository of FreeBSD (source, ports,
docs, ...) on another box, running 3.3-Stable and exporting the
repository via NFS.
I've tried to remake the
That sucks severely - NONE of the common units have the PPS output?!
Barf. Oh well.
--
--
Karl Denninger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Web: http://childrens-justice.org
Isn't it time we started putting KIDS first? See the above URL for
a plan to do exactly that!
On Sun, Jan 02, 2000 at 05:42:24PM
A few days ago I updated -current and build /usr/local completely new.
One remaining problem is, that procmail jobs seems to hang.
First it was a port problem, I installed some (for me) basic services
in /home/local and procmail tried to call /usr/local/bin/formail.
Now I recompiled procmail
Well, found out, that I don't have any problems using the previous
version of procmail 3.13.1.
So it's solved for me now. The remaining question is, is this a
procmail 3.14 bug, or does the new procmail version introduce
some new features in area where in -current is something wrong.
Not easy
That sucks severely - NONE of the common units have the PPS output?!
Barf. Oh well.
Many of them do, but it's still not meant for precision timekeeping and the
exact relationship between its PPS pulse edges and UTC's second boundaries
may not be precisely specified. It's not a good
Bonsoir,
Well, I don't remember indulging (Lagavulin, Glen Deveron, what else
...), but I'm stumped : I can't reproduce what I've seen : a full "cvs
co" of the ports and src has been running ok till its normal end.
more after some make world's
TfH
Thierry Herbelot wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Poul-Henning Kamp writes:
: I will (as always) recommend the Motorola Oncore UT+. If you buy it
We've also had excellent luck with the OEM version of the Oncore that
we embed in our products.
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe
On Sun, Jan 02, 2000 at 02:33:35PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Karl Denninger writes:
: That's EXPENSIVE.
Worth every penny. We've seen sub-micro second syncronization with
our unit on good hardware, and 1-2us on the 486 based hardware.
: Common handheld GPS
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Karl Denninger writes:
Why spend twice what Mr. Schwartz seems to want to charge?
For the Motorola name? Sorry, the Batwing Menace to employee's rights was
long ago placed on my "do not buy, do not recommend, actively boycott" list.
Well, suit your own political
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Karl Denninger writes:
: Why spend twice what Mr. Schwartz seems to want to charge?
Because we need a PPS that is 10nS from the true start of second for
our application? 1uS is really really bad for the timing geeks in the
audience.
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send
On Sun, Jan 02, 2000 at 03:32:00PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Karl Denninger writes:
: Why spend twice what Mr. Schwartz seems to want to charge?
Because we need a PPS that is 10nS from the true start of second for
our application? 1uS is really really bad for
On Sun, Jan 02, 2000 at 11:17:00PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Karl Denninger writes:
Why spend twice what Mr. Schwartz seems to want to charge?
For the Motorola name? Sorry, the Batwing Menace to employee's rights was
long ago placed on my "do not
Hi,
I have a couple of really dumb devices that I use 'tip' to talk to.
One is a Motorola 6811 microcontroller and the other is an old EEPROM
burner. I find that 'tip' overflows these devices when I'm sending
Motorola s-record and Intel Hex formatted files.
It looks like tip's 'cdelay' and
On Sun, Jan 02, 2000 at 03:42:24PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Karl Denninger writes:
: And on what hardware do you think you can obtain 10ns resolution RELIABLY
: at the software level in the Unix environment and under FreeBSD?
:
: Answer: NONE!
WRONG.
:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Karl Denninger writes:
On Sun, Jan 02, 2000 at 11:17:00PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Karl Denninger writes:
Why spend twice what Mr. Schwartz seems to want to charge?
Well, suit your own political manifests as you will, but
I would like to use the latest threads source because my application does
not work correctly with the signal handling bugs in 3.x's threads.
However, it does not appear that I can change it without replacing all of
libc. Is this correct? Or is there some simple change I can make to the
files in
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Karl Denninger writes:
: Yes, you have HARDWARE timers that do that.
:
: So what?
:
: I'm talking about TIME SERVERS on UNIX machines.
So am I.
: You know, ntpd and friends? Yes, that.
That's one of the things in our application.
: Now explain to me how
On Sun, Jan 02, 2000 at 03:50:35PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Karl Denninger writes:
: Yes, you have HARDWARE timers that do that.
:
: So what?
:
: I'm talking about TIME SERVERS on UNIX machines.
So am I.
: You know, ntpd and friends? Yes, that.
On Sun, Jan 02, 2000 at 04:53:55PM -0600, Karl Denninger wrote:
On Sun, Jan 02, 2000 at 11:49:08PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
..snip..
If you intend to keep up this "sour grapes" attitude, despite all
the helpful answers you have gotten so far, you should consider
stopping before you
On Sun, 2 Jan 2000, Karl Denninger wrote:
If you intend to keep up this "sour grapes" attitude, despite all
the helpful answers you have gotten so far, you should consider
stopping before you have worn out your welcome.
--
Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member
On Sun, Jan 02, 2000 at 03:13:10PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
On Sun, Jan 02, 2000 at 04:53:55PM -0600, Karl Denninger wrote:
On Sun, Jan 02, 2000 at 11:49:08PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
..snip..
If you intend to keep up this "sour grapes" attitude, despite all
the helpful
On Sun, Jan 02, 2000 at 06:17:59PM -0500, Chuck Robey wrote:
On Sun, 2 Jan 2000, Karl Denninger wrote:
If you intend to keep up this "sour grapes" attitude, despite all
the helpful answers you have gotten so far, you should consider
stopping before you have worn out your welcome.
On Sun, 2 Jan 2000, Karl Denninger wrote:
Why the hell Walnut Creek wastes their money on your type REMAINS beyond
my comprehension.
It really hasn't been a problem for anyone but you. It's more successful,
then say, alternative top level domain projects that have gone nowhere.
--
- bill
On Sun, Jan 02, 2000 at 06:37:31PM -0500, Bill Fumerola wrote:
On Sun, 2 Jan 2000, Karl Denninger wrote:
How many millions does Paol have to count in HIS bank as a result of this
shilling and "advocacy"?
SOME OF US have *REAL* successes to point to - not just bullshit pats on the
Hi there!
FOR ANYBODY THAT USES ZIP/PRINTER/PLIP ON THE PARALLEL PORT UNDER -current
A major ppbus(4) release is available for beta-testing.
It includes the port of the ppbus framework to the newbus system.
http://www.freebsd.org/~nsouch/ppbus.html
provides usefull notes about the
Oh, so the treehouse maggots continue to fester, eh?
Nice move shitheads.
Do you intend to continue?
Consider this forwarded to Steve, a withdrawal of my port, and notice of my
intent to post it along with a transcript on my web page for HomeDaemon.
Who is the two-bit-peckerhead who removed
Karl, I was my hands of this conversation. You aren't listening.
We have custom hardware. We're a control and measurement system. The
10ns is needed for that control and measurement part. The sync we
get of the system clock, like I said before, is on the order of a few
hundred ns on pentium
In all the years I've known you, Karl, you've always thought you were so far above
everyone else. Apparently, you get off on treating people like shit.
Go away, we don't need your "contributions" here... I'm not sure we ever did.
--
This message has been sent via an anonymous mail relay at
Doesn't change the facts Gary.
This isn't the first time either Gary.
Plausable deniability isn't going to wash here.
--
--
Karl Denninger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Web: http://childrens-justice.org
Isn't it time we started putting KIDS first? See the above URL for
a plan to do exactly that!
On
Any pointers to web pages on setting up a killfile? The signal to noise
ratio on this list is dropping rapidly.
-Kip
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Grow up.
-Kip
On Sun, 2 Jan 2000, Karl Denninger wrote:
Just for those of you who think this whole "magical unsubscribe" is
a "fluke";
All unsubscribes and subscribes to FreeBSD's lists must be
authenticated. Majordomo is set to confirm all
On Sat, Jan 01, 2000 at 01:32:19PM -0600, Dan Nelson wrote:
The box is a 333MHz PII, with 64M ram. Do I just need more ram to be
able to compile in reasonable time, or is something broken?
You probably need more RAM. sql_yacc.cc is one of those "worst-case"
programs as far as gcc is
On 03-Jan-00 Karl Denninger wrote:
Just for those of you who think this whole "magical unsubscribe" is
a "fluke";
All unsubscribes and subscribes to FreeBSD's lists must be
authenticated. Majordomo is set to confirm all transactions.
It is still possible for Majordomo to
On Sun, 2 Jan 2000, Karl Denninger wrote:
Just for those of you who think this whole "magical unsubscribe" is
a "fluke";
This does not involve any of the rest of the list subscribers, and I'm
sure the majority of us don't really want to see EITHER side's rantings.
Really, grow up. If you
OK, enough of this, let Karl be on his own for a while. Stop responding,
Karl's too mad to think clearly, and you guys are just baiting
him. Anyone responding is asking for addition to the kill-file.
I already posted this to ports, where the other part of this has
unfortunately spilled into.
On Sun, Jan 02, 2000 at 06:08:31PM -0600, Karl Denninger wrote:
As for whoever the person is who force-removed me from the list, trust
me on this - I won't forget that act, and until you're identified and
permanently removed from both the list and the entire project you'll
have no
On Sun, Jan 02, 2000 at 05:44:57PM -0600, Karl Denninger wrote:
sarcasm
We can point to the Internet's evolution of these "treehouse" organizations
and show off how PROUD we are of them and those who support them.
Let's start a nice short list, shall we?
Network Solutions.
ARIN.
On Sun, 2 Jan 2000, Karl Denninger wrote:
Theo was right in splitting off from you folks. I should have followed
him a couple of years ago and done my own split. Now, its simply not
worth it.
Not that you'll listen, but: OpenBSD split from NetBSD. FreeBSD is and
always has been a
On Sun, 2 Jan 2000, Karl Denninger wrote:
Just for those of you who think this whole "magical unsubscribe" is
a "fluke";
I run/maintain the PostgreSQL mailing lists ... there is a piece of
software that you can "add on" called bouncefilter that auto-unsubscribes
based on various criteria ...
On Sun, 2 Jan 2000, Will Andrews wrote:
Theo split from NetBSD. Again, further ignorance. I suggest you sit down with a
copy of /usr/share/misc/bsd-family-tree and read a little history that you seem
to have missed.
Cool, I never even knew that was there...now I have something to look at
I have to say that PHK has become the MASTER at pissing
people off, ensuring that his opponent goes the deep end
and staying calm so the blame obviously does not fall on
him. Got to admit his formula is very very nice 8)
By a long shot the problem is NOT Karl. It takes at least
TWO to engage
Do you know what the timeline is on this integration?
-Kip
On Sun, 2 Jan 2000, Daniel Eischen wrote:
Kip Macy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry for sending this again but when I first sent it -current was
embroiled in a flame war.
I would like to
Someone logged into HUB the EDITED me out of the CURRENT mailing list.
As near as I can tell, noone with the ability to su was logged into
hub earlier today when you claim that you were removed. As far as I know,
noone had removed you. I have not seen any messages (other than your
claim) or
I have to say that PHK has become the MASTER at pissing
people off, ensuring that his opponent goes the deep end
and staying calm so the blame obviously does not fall on
him. Got to admit his formula is very very nice 8)
I dont think so. Whatever PHK may or may not have done in the past
I have to say that PHK has become the MASTER at pissing
people off, ensuring that his opponent goes the deep end
and staying calm so the blame obviously does not fall on
him. Got to admit his formula is very very nice 8)
By a long shot the problem is NOT Karl. It takes at least
TWO to engage
Congratulations, Karl. You just proven to the world what a complete asshole you
really are.
Now get out of here. We don't want you.
--
This message has been sent via an anonymous mail relay at www.no-id.com.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe
He is just expressing his point. From what I can tell someone removed him
from the list with no reason and now he is angry. I probably would be too.
Also, I can tell that someone is doing some good covering up. Its ashame to
see leaders do this.
Sam
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL
On Sun, 2 Jan 2000, Amancio Hasty wrote:
I have to say that PHK has become the MASTER at pissing
people off, ensuring that his opponent goes the deep end
and staying calm so the blame obviously does not fall on
him. Got to admit his formula is very very nice 8)
By a long shot the
On Sun, 2 Jan 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Congratulations, Karl. You just proven to the world what a complete
asshole you really are.
Now get out of here. We don't want you.
Will whoever this is, please stop? There is no valid reason for anonymity
here (and to be honest, in this
On Sun, Jan 02, 2000 at 09:59:28PM -0600, wrote:
He is just expressing his point. From what I can tell someone removed him
from the list with no reason and now he is angry. I probably would be too.
That does not excuse his style of communication. Shouting and
calling people names
At 08:20 PM 1/2/00 -0800, David Greenman wrote:
He is just expressing his point. From what I can tell someone removed him
from the list with no reason and now he is angry. I probably would be too.
That is not at all what happend. Karl went off the deep end about phk
recommending a Motorola
On Sun, 2 Jan 2000, Kenneth Wayne Culver wrote:
OK, there is still the static problem with the pcm driver with a ViBRA16X
soundcard. It also seems that the problem with xmms's analyzer is gone.
However, now whenever a sound that is shorter than roughly 1 second or so
plays, it gets cut
Hi David,
My post is not really based upon the last Karl vs. Pohl thread.
It is more on what I have observed quietly over the last
few months . If the behavior is left unchecked you can
rest assure that their will be more flares up.
Again, to have waited for Karl to cool off is not
that
On Sun, 2 Jan 2000, Kip Macy wrote:
Any pointers to web pages on setting up a killfile? The signal to noise
ratio on this list is dropping rapidly.
I haven't done it myself, but I know that you can read some of the
documentation for procmail (/usr/ports/mail/procmail) and easily
forward
Thanks. I would've tried to fix it myself, but I am not too familiar with
programming for a soundcard. I'm only famaliar with the ata driver right
now.
=
| Kenneth Culver | FreeBSD: The best OS around.|
| Unix
Howdy all,
I'm putting together some specs for a type of firewall appliance using
the eventual released version of FreeBSD 4 (targeting 4.x because I need
GCC 2.95.x as core compiler). My current machine specs use the
following hardware which I am not yet sure will be well supported.
FIC
I'm putting together some specs for a type of firewall appliance using
the eventual released version of FreeBSD 4 (targeting 4.x because I need
GCC 2.95.x as core compiler). My current machine specs use the
following hardware which I am not yet sure will be well supported.
FIC PAG-2130
I'm bringing this back up to -current to kick around some more. We may
want to move it to -emulators.
On Sun, 2 Jan 2000, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
This isn't intended as a 'final solution' :-) The problem is *very*
difficult since you're asking the syscall to intuit what the user/program
-- enters stage right
... opens door ...
heyy a party! And nobody invited me!
U, Why's the piano broken in two and all the tables
overturned? Ahhh, whats with all the stares? guys?
Guys!
exits stage
On Sun, 2 Jan 2000, Matthew Dillon wrote:
-- enters stage right
... opens door ...
heyy a party! And nobody invited me!
U, Why's the piano broken in two and all the tables
overturned? Ahhh, whats with all the stares? guys?
will somebody filter Mr Denninger from the list
his postings are beginning to to irritate and look
more and more like the ravings of an offensive lunatic
who drank too much methanol during new years celebrations
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current"
Mike Smith wrote:
I'm putting together some specs for a type of firewall appliance using
the eventual released version of FreeBSD 4 (targeting 4.x because I need
GCC 2.95.x as core compiler). My current machine specs use the
following hardware which I am not yet sure will be well
* From: Karl Denninger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
rant
Wow, that was good! I'm going to nominate this for "this century's
most amusing message on the FreeBSD lists" award. :)
Satoshi "you can figure out which century I'm talking about" Asami
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
Oh, I think he douched with a molatov cocktail, after his boyfriend fisted him.
will somebody filter Mr Denninger from the list his postings are beginning to to
irritate and look more and more like the ravings of an offensive lunatic who drank
too much methanol during new years celebrations
64 matches
Mail list logo
