ok, now...to get it working...
ideas?
On 05-Jan-00 Warner Losh wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> William Woods writes:
>: slot is taller
>
> Then it is a pccard.
>
> Warner
--
E-Mail: William Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 04-Jan-00
Time: 23:40:
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> William Woods writes:
: slot is taller
Then it is a pccard.
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On Tue, Jan 04, 2000 at 02:12:08PM -0800, Chris Piazza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes. I must warn you it's still really buggy if you intend to use
> it a lot. Basically all I did was grab the opera tarball, extract
> it and run the 'runnow' script.
>
> Screenshot here: http://www.freebsd.o
slot is taller
On 05-Jan-00 Warner Losh wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> William Woods writes:
>: *
>: **
>:
>: is what I see
>
> Which part is taller, the tab sticking out, or the slot sticking in?
> If the tab is taller, it is likely cardbus, otherwise pccard. I
> suspect that the slo
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> William Woods writes:
: *
: **
:
: is what I see
Which part is taller, the tab sticking out, or the slot sticking in?
If the tab is taller, it is likely cardbus, otherwise pccard. I
suspect that the slot is taller since you don't have the row of bumps
on the card.
*
**
is what I see
On 05-Jan-00 Warner Losh wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> William Woods writes:
>: Not near the laptop right now to get a dumpcis for you, but I have the card
>: here,
>:
>: it doesnt look like either...it is like this
>:
>: **
>: **
>: **
>
> Are you sure? Both t
On Tue, Jan 04, 2000 at 11:05:57PM -0800, William Woods wrote:
>
> >: 3COM Megahertz 10/100 LAN PC Card model #3CCFE574BT
> >
> > If this is the cardbus version, no. If it is the pccard version then
> > yes. We've received reports of this same model number being used for
> > both the pccard an
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Mikhail A. Sokolov" writes:
: But not that my card was recongnized 2 days ago. It's 10mbit/56K,
: probably 574{,B}. ep0 in OpenBSD and in old PAO.
Odd. Did you get the following failure:
Unit failed to come ready or product ID unknown (id 0x%x)?
and if so,
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> William Woods writes:
: Not near the laptop right now to get a dumpcis for you, but I have the card
: here,
:
: it doesnt look like either...it is like this
:
: **
: **
: **
Are you sure? Both the right and left sides have a key to prevent low
voltage only card
On Wed, Jan 05, 2000 at 12:19:13AM -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
# In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Mikhail A. Sokolov" writes:
# : And what about 3cxem556b? When somebody already asked some time ago, I looked
# : through archives to no avail of information. It worked splendid on 2.2.7-pao ;)
#
# What
Not near the laptop right now to get a dumpcis for you, but I have the card
here,
it doesnt look like either...it is like this
**
**
**
On 05-Jan-00 Warner Losh wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> William Woods writes:
>: > Hold on. Lemme try something here
>: >
>: > 1) Physical insp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Mikhail A. Sokolov" writes:
: And what about 3cxem556b? When somebody already asked some time ago, I looked
: through archives to no avail of information. It worked splendid on 2.2.7-pao ;)
What's a 3cxem556b? It looks like the -current sources identify it
and mak
And what about 3cxem556b? When somebody already asked some time ago, I looked
through archives to no avail of information. It worked splendid on 2.2.7-pao ;)
OpenBSD 2.6, which I have to use now isn't a solution due to it being OpenBSD.
On Wed, Jan 05, 2000 at 12:03:15AM -0700, Warner Losh wrote
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> William Woods writes:
: > Hold on. Lemme try something here
: >
: > 1) Physical inspection. The cardbus cards have a row of dots on the
: >top side of the card right next to the connectors for the
: >pccard/cardbus bus for better grounding and are ofte
> Hold on. Lemme try something here
>
> 1) Physical inspection. The cardbus cards have a row of dots on the
>top side of the card right next to the connectors for the
>pccard/cardbus bus for better grounding and are often copper in
>color.
Nope, no row of dots or anything simi
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> William Woods writes:
: So, how do I tell if its pccard or cardbus? Got some way for me to test it?
Hold on. Lemme try something here
1) Physical inspection. The cardbus cards have a row of dots on the
top side of the card right next to the connectors for
>: 3COM Megahertz 10/100 LAN PC Card model #3CCFE574BT
>
> If this is the cardbus version, no. If it is the pccard version then
> yes. We've received reports of this same model number being used for
> both the pccard and cardbus.
So, how do I tell if its pccard or cardbus? Got some way for me
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Frank Mayhar writes:
: Wups, I thought I read 575BT. But no, the 574BT doesn't work either; there's
: a bug somewhere in the driver. I have one of _those_, too, having read the
: same thing you did.
Last I heard, Matt Dodd had or was waiting for a 574BT and pccard
Thanks for implementing the result of our earlier discussion. I
documented what you wrote, and as a result I have the following
suggestions for further improvements:
* The assignment to not_text should depend on out_quiet
if no --binary-files option is given.
* The operands of --binary-f
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> William Woods writes:
: I thought I read in the mailing list that the 3COM did work..
There are two different versions of the 3ccfe574. One is cardbus and
one is pccard, although the pccard may be 3c574. At
least that's what the conclusion was when this came u
Man, this is getting depressing, all these goodies for Christmass and NADA
workie, well, I assume that -current they are working on the driver for the
574BT right and eventually it will work.
On a side note, how does your laptop like -current? I am going to run it on a
Thinkpad 770E
On 05-Jan-
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> William Woods writes:
: I have two pcmcia cards here I am wondering if the work under either -stable
: or -current, they are:
:
: 3COM Megahertz 10/100 LAN PC Card model #3CCFE574BT
If this is the cardbus version, no. If it is the pccard version then
yes. We've
William Woods wrote:
> I thought I read in the mailing list that the 3COM did work..
Wups, I thought I read 575BT. But no, the 574BT doesn't work either; there's
a bug somewhere in the driver. I have one of _those_, too, having read the
same thing you did.
--
Frank Mayhar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I thought I read in the mailing list that the 3COM did work..
On 05-Jan-00 Frank Mayhar wrote:
> William Woods wrote:
>> I have two pcmcia cards here I am wondering if the work under either -stable
>> or -current, they are:
>>
>> 3COM Megahertz 10/100 LAN PC Card model #3CCFE574BT
>
> Thi
Hi.
First of all, I tried to take in modification of 3-stable into
4-current. And I tested with 4-current NFS server and diskless
client.
merge from latest 3-stable rc.diskless shell scripts:
etc/rc.diskless1 1.1.2.1(for 3-stable)
etc/rc.diskless2 1.2.2.1(for 3-stable)
Som
William Woods wrote:
> I have two pcmcia cards here I am wondering if the work under either -stable
> or -current, they are:
>
> 3COM Megahertz 10/100 LAN PC Card model #3CCFE574BT
This is a cardbus card (I have one, too) and won't work. Many of us are
eagerly awaiting Warner's new cardbus cod
At 04:05 AM 1/5/00 +, Cameron Grant wrote:
> > bus_dmamap_load: Too many segs! buf_len = 0xdf00
> > bus_dmamap_load: Too many segs! buf_len = 0xdf00
>
>argh, forgot something. try mss.c rev 1.44, sb.c rev 1.48.
>
> - cameron
Now the au files play great !!!
there is still something amiss
... it looks like only a small subset of the man pages for bind 8.2.2P5
(in /usr/src/contrib) gets installed. In particular, we are missing the
man page for nsupdate. Any reasons for not installing the whole bunch,
since we do install the binaries?
PYD
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROT
On Wed, 5 Jan 2000, Ollivier Robert wrote:
> According to Rodney W. Grimes:
> > xntpd was recently renamed ntpd, but the documentation and manual
> > pages was not.
>
> > You'll find the manual page for ntpd with a ``man xntpd''.
Those are the old man pages. You're not running -current if yo
> bus_dmamap_load: Too many segs! buf_len = 0xdf00
> bus_dmamap_load: Too many segs! buf_len = 0xdf00
argh, forgot something. try mss.c rev 1.44, sb.c rev 1.48.
- cameron
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
At 03:08 AM 1/5/00 +, Cameron Grant wrote:
>the panics should be fixed now with sb.c rev 1.47, mss.c rev 1.43.
>
> - cameron
>
Cameron
The panics are stopped
But any sound out of speakers is truncated.
If I try to play a au file it just repeats the first part of it over and over.
The
I have two pcmcia cards here I am wondering if the work under either -stable
or -current, they are:
3COM Megahertz 10/100 LAN PC Card model #3CCFE574BT
The other card is cardbus, so I doubt it but I will ask anyway
Adaptec SlimSCSI 1480A UltraSCSI
If either of these cards DO work, what
the panics should be fixed now with sb.c rev 1.47, mss.c rev 1.43.
- cameron
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
>
>
> --n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> On Fri, Nov 12, 1999 at 20:45:10 -0800, Paul Eggert wrote:
> >
> >Date: Fri, 12 Nov 1999 17:23:21 -0800
> >From: "David O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >I assume "--ignore-binary" or "--ignore-binary-file
According to Rodney W. Grimes:
> xntpd was recently renamed ntpd, but the documentation and manual
> pages was not.
> You'll find the manual page for ntpd with a ``man xntpd''.
Yes and no. The documentation is close for command line options but probably
far behind for drivers.
> And a side n
According to Marc Schneiders:
> According to /usr/src/contrib/ntp/FREEBSD-upgrade they should be
> installed as docs in /usr/share/doc/ntp. I haven't got them there.
They will soon.
> haven't tried to read all the files in all the subdirs of both
> usr.sbin/ntp and contrib/ntp :-)
There's not
On Tue, 4 Jan 2000, Alex wrote:
> and I apologise for wrongfully accusing it. The panic is in fact
> caused by newpcm (Cameron CC'd). DDB trace can be provided upon request
> (is there a way to save it into a file instead of having to write it
> down on a piece of paper?)
Serial consoles
On Tue, 4 Jan 2000, Soren Schmidt wrote:
> The problem here is that you will then do a lot of unneeded padding
> as the driver will attempt to pad to the blocksize used which is not
> wanted. You HAVE to use the right blocksize especially for audio, or
> you will get "silent" ie zero padded block
One of my Western Digital Caviars doesn't work under the new ATA driver:
upon trying to access the disk (via swapon or mount during boot) it gives
the famous "lost contact with disk" message and falls back to PIO mode.
Interestingly, my two older WDCs work fine - although I notice that ad1
and ad2
On Tue, 4 Jan 2000, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> genassym is now in /usr/src/usr.bin/genassym, compile and install that
> then try your make again. The one in the local compile directory is
> still being used for other things (and not compatible with the one
> in /usr/src/usr.bin/ )
Nick Hibma wrote:
>
> Starting mpg123 with a random mpg3 file produces the following panic
> within half a second. The kernel is current as of this morning. THe
> panic is reproducable (as in, I cannot play the mpg3 file).
>
> kernel plus core available if needed.
>
> Dec 15 14:55:25 henny /ker
Should it be described in /usr/src/UPDATING ?
On Tue, 4 Jan 2000, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2000 14:38:45 -0800 (PST)
> From: Matthew Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Dmitry Valdov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: options COMPAT_LINUX makes kernel fail t
On Tue, 4 Jan 2000, David Scheidt wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Jan 2000, Soren Schmidt wrote:
>
> > It seems Marc Schneiders wrote:
> > > Where do I look for new man pages? I would like to read those for the
> > > new ata driver and for ntpd. They were not created during a build
> > > world some 5 days ag
:Hi!
:
:With option COMPAT_LINUX (which present in LINT) make depend fails with:
:cc -O -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes
:-Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual
:-fformat-extensions -ansi -nostdinc -I- -I. -I../.. -I../../../include
:-D_KERNEL -incl
Hi!
With option COMPAT_LINUX (which present in LINT) make depend fails with:
cc -O -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes
-Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual
-fformat-extensions -ansi -nostdinc -I- -I. -I../.. -I../../../include
-D_KERNEL -include opt_
> Actually i never used it under X11, but it is very important for
> us to have it to run cross-compilers (which are only available as
> DOS binaries) integrated with native development environment under
> FreeBSD.
>
> I am not sure how many people use it this way. But if it is not
> build in bui
On Tue, Jan 04, 2000 at 12:10:35PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Marcel Moolenaar writes:
> : doscmd breaks cross-building, because it depends on X11 which obviously
> : is not in the source tree (see below). I'm proposing to remove doscmd
> : from the source tree and
On Tue, Jan 04, 2000 at 03:29:34PM -0600, wrote:
> Has anyone gotten Opera beta working under linux emulation?
Yes. I must warn you it's still really buggy if you intend to use
it a lot. Basically all I did was grab the opera tarball, extract
it and run the 'runnow' script.
Screenshot he
Has anyone gotten Opera beta working under linux emulation?
Thanks,
Sam
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Dave J. Boers wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can anyone tell me how to compile and install libF77/libI77 from
> /usr/src/contrib/libf2c please? Or, for that matter, the whole libf2c?
>
> I need the libraries and the ones from netlib won't compile. Is there some
> way to include building the libraries in a s
On Tue, Jan 04, 2000 at 10:23:37PM +0100, Dave J. Boers wrote:
> Can anyone tell me how to compile and install libF77/libI77 from
> /usr/src/contrib/libf2c please? Or, for that matter, the whole libf2c?
(reply to self...)
It's funny how I tend to find things out only just _after_ I asked someon
Hi,
Can anyone tell me how to compile and install libF77/libI77 from
/usr/src/contrib/libf2c please? Or, for that matter, the whole libf2c?
I need the libraries and the ones from netlib won't compile. Is there some
way to include building the libraries in a standard make buildworld?
Thanks a
Bruce Evans wrote:
> Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2000 02:54:50 +1100 (EST)
> > consider applying the included patch to re-enable them?
>
> > +static int
> > +nap ( int microsec )
> > +{
> > +int rc;
> > +
> > +rc = usleep ( microsec );
> > +if (rc != 0) {
> > +fprintf
> Where do I look for new man pages? I would like to read those for the
> new ata driver and for ntpd. They were not created during a build
> world some 5 days ago. And I cannot find them in
> /usr/src/share/man/man4, where I would expect man ata/ad in any case.
Sos already answered about ata/ad,
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Marcel Moolenaar writes:
: I think it's too system dependent to live in the source tree :-)
I don't. It is highly dependent on kernel elements.
: From the manpage:
: -x Open an X11 window to display output. This enables a variety in-
: terrupts not available
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Marcel Moolenaar writes:
: doscmd breaks cross-building, because it depends on X11 which obviously
: is not in the source tree (see below). I'm proposing to remove doscmd
: from the source tree and make it a port (emulators/doscmd).
One can build it w/o X11. Doesn'
:Me too ;)
:
:I got almost 300 of these messages during a "make release" with the
:chroot dir NFS mounted. Otherwise I had no problems with such over
:NFS created files though.
:
:Daniel
I think I've tracked it down. When the client close()'s an NFS filehandle
it calls nfs_flush() withou
Josh Tiefenbach schrieb:
>
> > :NFS append race @0:19
>
> [snip]
>
> > There were a bunch of situations that could cause this, including an
> > append race for which the debug message was named after. The append
> > race is now fixed but there are still a few situations that can
I have just finished putting the latest Alpha 4.0 CURRENT up on the Internet
for developers to use.
The system that I have it running on is a brand new EV6.7 XP1000 running at
667MHZ with two gigs of ram.
You can get your free shell account at http://www.testdrive.compaq.com
This is not intended
Hi,
On post new year's -current I've observed strange panics: when I'm starting my
XFree server (CT4 SVGA) it paniced with "panic: isa_dmastart: bad bounce
buffer" message.
Regards,
Maxim
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of th
> :NFS append race @0:19
[snip]
> There were a bunch of situations that could cause this, including an
> append race for which the debug message was named after. The append
> race is now fixed but there are still a few situations that can cause
> this to occur.
Just anothe
At Tue, 4 Jan 2000 11:43:36 +0100,
Pascal Hofstee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 04, 2000 at 09:27:54AM +, Doug Rabson wrote:
> > On Tue, 4 Jan 2000, Pascal Hofstee wrote:
> >
> > > Hi, With CURRENT sources updated earlier today ... my system now
> > > crash-and-burns when trying
:Just saw this passing on the console while compiling teTeX on an NFS
:mounted dir:
:
:NFS append race @0:19
:NFS append race @0:135
:NFS append race @0:60
:NFS append race @0:102
:NFS append race @0:60
:NFS append race @0:12
:NFS append race @0:24
:NFS append race @0:66
:NFS append race @0:512
:N
"Kenneth D. Merry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thomas Graichen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> has been working on getting both
> of Initio's drivers into FreeBSD. This may explain why Initio has fixed
> the copyright on their Ultra-Wide driver. (Their Ultra2 driver never had a
> copyright problem.) You
On Tue, Jan 04, 2000 at 02:58:01PM +0100, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> [sent to both -current and -arch]
>
> Hi,
>
> doscmd breaks cross-building, because it depends on X11 which obviously
> is not in the source tree (see below). I'm proposing to remove doscmd
> from the source tree and make it a p
On Tue, 04 Jan 2000, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> Ok, but this means that we won't install doscmd with X11 support
> anymore. The user has to rebuild doscmd itself to have X11 support. In
> that case, it's better to have it in the ports collection...
I agree. Further, if X is not found, the port ca
Bruce Evans wrote:
>
> > > It uses wrong ifdefs for the X11 files :-). It should never find any X11
> > > files for building worlds, since there are no X11 includes or libraries
> > > under ${WORLDTMP}. Adding some ${DESTDIR}'s is probably a sufficient fix.
> >
> > Ok, but this means that we wo
On Tue, 4 Jan 2000, Soren Schmidt wrote:
> It seems Marc Schneiders wrote:
> > Where do I look for new man pages? I would like to read those for the
> > new ata driver and for ntpd. They were not created during a build
> > world some 5 days ago. And I cannot find them in
> > /usr/src/share/man/ma
I second this. I'm not a linux user, but as a FreeBSD newbie
I had a lot of trouble getting anywhere with console programs,
esp. emacs and various IDE's that I tried to install. The key
board mapping was difficult/impossible to figure out, and it
also seemed like cons25 didn't always work correc
From: Bosko Milekic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> You don't happen to have a backtrace?
I don't have it. When my box gives no reaction, I've hit some keys,
keys, keys...and rebooted automatically. At that time, I could not
switch to VT1 from X with [Ctrl]+[Alt]+[F1].
> Was anything partic
On Tue, 4 Jan 2000, Brian Dean wrote:
> Since no one seems to recall why these features were removed, and I
> don't see any reference to them in the CVS log, would someone please
The were gone in the base version (4.4Lite1).
> consider applying the included patch to re-enable them?
> +static i
On Tue, 4 Jan 2000, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> Bruce Evans wrote:
> >
> > But it doesn't depend on X11. It ifdefs some X11 files and only builds
> > the X11 version if X11 seems to be present.
>
> X11 can be present, but it won't necessarily be a usable X11. A i386
> cross-build on Alpha will u
Hi,
(replying to myself)
Since no one seems to recall why these features were removed, and I
don't see any reference to them in the CVS log, would someone please
consider applying the included patch to re-enable them?
This patch also includes a fix I made to correct PR bin/15847 that I
opened.
Bruce Evans wrote:
>
> On Tue, 4 Jan 2000, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
>
> > [sent to both -current and -arch]
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > doscmd breaks cross-building, because it depends on X11 which obviously
> > is not in the source tree (see below). I'm proposing to remove doscmd
> > from the source tre
It seems Marc Schneiders wrote:
> Where do I look for new man pages? I would like to read those for the
> new ata driver and for ntpd. They were not created during a build
> world some 5 days ago. And I cannot find them in
> /usr/src/share/man/man4, where I would expect man ata/ad in any case.
Th
On Tue, 4 Jan 2000, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> [sent to both -current and -arch]
>
> Hi,
>
> doscmd breaks cross-building, because it depends on X11 which obviously
> is not in the source tree (see below). I'm proposing to remove doscmd
> from the source tree and make it a port (emulators/doscmd
[sent to both -current and -arch]
Hi,
doscmd breaks cross-building, because it depends on X11 which obviously
is not in the source tree (see below). I'm proposing to remove doscmd
from the source tree and make it a port (emulators/doscmd).
Your comments please.
>From a i386 cross-build on Alph
Where do I look for new man pages? I would like to read those for the
new ata driver and for ntpd. They were not created during a build
world some 5 days ago. And I cannot find them in
/usr/src/share/man/man4, where I would expect man ata/ad in any case.
TIA.
--
Marc Schneiders
[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Fri, Nov 12, 1999 at 20:45:10 -0800, Paul Eggert wrote:
>
>Date: Fri, 12 Nov 1999 17:23:21 -0800
>From: "David O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>I assume "--ignore-binary" or "--ignore-binary-files" would be the GNU
>longopt.
>
> Another possibility would be to follow the examp
Just saw this passing on the console while compiling teTeX on an NFS
mounted dir:
NFS append race @0:19
NFS append race @0:135
NFS append race @0:60
NFS append race @0:102
NFS append race @0:60
NFS append race @0:12
NFS append race @0:24
NFS append race @0:66
NFS append race @0:512
NFS append rac
Soren Schmidt wrote:
>
> It seems Alex wrote:
> > pcm0: at port 0x530-0x537,0x538-0x539 irq 5 drq 1 flags 0xa110
> > on isa0
> >
> >
> > Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
> > fault virtual address = 0xbff21000
> > fault code = supervisor read, page not present
> > in
On Tue, Jan 04, 2000 at 09:27:54AM +, Doug Rabson wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Jan 2000, Pascal Hofstee wrote:
>
> > Hi, With CURRENT sources updated earlier today ... my system now
> > crash-and-burns when trying to play audio.
> >
> > i have foudn these messages in /var/log/messages:
> >
> > Jan 4
On Tue, Jan 04, 2000 at 10:30:22AM +, Alex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> and I apologise for wrongfully accusing it. The panic is in fact
> caused by newpcm (Cameron CC'd). DDB trace can be provided upon request
> (is there a way to save it into a file instead of having to write it
> do
On Tue, 4 Jan 2000, Pascal Hofstee wrote:
> Hi, With CURRENT sources updated earlier today ... my system now
> crash-and-burns when trying to play audio.
>
> i have foudn these messages in /var/log/messages:
>
> Jan 4 01:30:26 shadowmere /kernel: gusc0: at port
> 0x220,0x320-0x327,0x32c-0x333
It seems Alex wrote:
>
> Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
> fault virtual address = 0xbff21000
> fault code = supervisor read, page not present
> instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc0214ffe
> stack pointer = 0x10:0xc02f6b58
> frame pointer = 0x10:0xc0
On Tue, Jan 04, 2000 at 09:06:14AM +, Alex wrote:
> Today's -current:
>
> Copyright (c) 1992-2000 The FreeBSD Project.
> Copyright (c) 1982, 1986, 1989, 1991, 1993
> The Regents of the University of California. All rights
> reserved.
> FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT #21: Tue Jan 4 08:00:34 GMT
Today's -current:
Copyright (c) 1992-2000 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1982, 1986, 1989, 1991, 1993
The Regents of the University of California. All rights
reserved.
FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT #21: Tue Jan 4 08:00:34 GMT 2000
Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz
CPU: AMD-K6(tm) 3D pr
I don't recommend using USB on 3.4. It's a lot less reliable than the
version in CURRENT. The reason for it being there (in a hidden
fashion) is historic and nothing to be proud of.
Nick
On Wed, 29 Dec 1999, Eric D. Futch wrote:
> Oh hehe damn did it again. Keep getting my lists mixed up. Th
It seems Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Jan 2000, Soren Schmidt wrote:
>
> > Either the patch is very short, or you forgot to include it :)
>
> *LOL* I can't believe I did that :) It'll be on this one!!
Yup, this time there is a patch :)
> > The ATA_16BIT_ONLY thing is to only
89 matches
Mail list logo
