> Western Digital Caviar hard drives that should support UDMA/33, as should
> the Chipset.
>
> Both boot up, trying UDMA mode, throwing ICRC READ ERROR's then kick back
> down to PIO mode 4.
> Bios's are set to do auto-chose pio/dma modes.
There may be a BIOS option that will disable DMA entire
Hi,
With USA_RESIDENT=NO and -DNOCRYPT:
cc -O2 -pipe -I/usr/obj/source/cleansrc/lib/libipsec -DIPSEC_DEBUG -DIPSEC
-DINE
T6 -I/usr/obj/source/cleansrc/i386/usr/include -c policy_token.c -o
policy_token
.o
/source/cleansrc/lib/libipsec/policy_token.l: In function `__libyylex':
/source/cleansrc/
On Fri, 14 Apr 2000, Joe Greco wrote:
> > In other words, if we're going to be replacing sendmail with an
> > alternative MTA, I'd prefer postfix over qmail, and I believe I can
> > marshall some pretty strong arguments for that position.
>
> Perhaps it's time to revisit something I pr
> On Fri, 14 Apr 2000, Joe Greco wrote:
>
> > > In other words, if we're going to be replacing sendmail with an
> > > alternative MTA, I'd prefer postfix over qmail, and I believe I can
> > > marshall some pretty strong arguments for that position.
> >
> > Perhaps it's time to revisit
On Sat, 15 Apr 2000, Joe Greco wrote:
> Uh, Chuck, can you tell me how many BIND and Sendmail advisories there have
> been in the last five years?
>
> Wouldn't it be nice if we could just tell newbies, "hey, yeah, that Sendmail
> has a known security issue, pkg_delete it and then add this new on
> On Sat, 15 Apr 2000, Joe Greco wrote:
>
> > Uh, Chuck, can you tell me how many BIND and Sendmail advisories there have
> > been in the last five years?
> >
> > Wouldn't it be nice if we could just tell newbies, "hey, yeah, that Sendmail
> > has a known security issue, pkg_delete it and then a
How will this affect this /etc/mail/mailer.conf "thing" (and I wonder
why that was put there to begin with).
If we're going to use a mailer.conf, then it should be able to
work with other MTAs; which it probably won't because they perform
their respective tasks differently.
_F
To Unsubscribe
I have a dell inspiron 3200 with a cs4236b isa non-pnp soundcard. It
works in 3.4 with the folowing kernel lines:
device snd0
device css0 at isa? port 0x530 irq 9 drq 1 flags 0x13
device mpu0 at isa?
with a hack to /src/sys/i386/isa/sound/sound_config.h
changing
#define DSP_DEFAULT_SPEED
On Sat, 15 Apr 2000, Joe Greco wrote:
> Chuck,
>
> Please go back and read what I _wrote_. Your response assumes I made
I've got your message, I quoted it fully in my first response. You asked
to "Remove Sendmail from the base system", and that's a direct quote, Joe.
> statements that I cert
> On Sat, 15 Apr 2000, Joe Greco wrote:
>
> > Chuck,
> >
> > Please go back and read what I _wrote_. Your response assumes I made
>
> I've got your message, I quoted it fully in my first response. You asked
> to "Remove Sendmail from the base system", and that's a direct quote, Joe.
Yes. Th
On Tue, Apr 04, 2000 at 06:43:03PM +1000, Omachonu Ogali wrote:
>I don't know whether to hand this to -doc or here, so I'll take the risk
>of here, patch simply adds comments to sysctl variables.
Before you get too enthusiastic about adding description strings to the
declarations, you might like
On Fri, Apr 14, 2000 at 05:21:24PM -0500, Joe Greco wrote:
> Remove Sendmail from the base system - or, at least, make it a "package"
> that is removable with the package management tool. Then be able to add
> another mailer (or an updated Sendmail) in its place. Ideally, Sendmail
> would be ava
At 05:53 AM 4/12/00 -0400, Trevor Johnson wrote:
>> Western Digital Caviar hard drives that should support UDMA/33, as should
>> the Chipset.
>>
>> Both boot up, trying UDMA mode, throwing ICRC READ ERROR's then kick back
>> down to PIO mode 4.
>
>> Bios's are set to do auto-chose pio/dma modes.
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Chuck Robey
writes:
: ALWAYS provide sensible default values, not a bunch of expert questions.
If it were up to me, I'd ship with all mailers turned off by
default. They are all big, bad and ugly when it comes to security.
Sendmail's faults are just more widely pu
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Peter
Jeremy writes:
: Before you get too enthusiastic about adding description strings to the
: declarations, you might like to work out:
: 1) How to store the descriptions so they are accessible to sysctl(8),
:but don't bloat the loaded kernel image.
: 2) How
> On Fri, Apr 14, 2000 at 05:21:24PM -0500, Joe Greco wrote:
> > Remove Sendmail from the base system - or, at least, make it a "package"
> > that is removable with the package management tool. Then be able to add
> > another mailer (or an updated Sendmail) in its place. Ideally, Sendmail
> > wo
We argue about this a lot. Nobody has, as yet, ever done the work to
make "bindist" a meta-package which depends (perhaps selectively) on
sub-packages like groff, sendmail, gcc, et al. to achieve the required
state of "bundling by default but not by requirement" in FreeBSD.
This is despite the f
17 matches
Mail list logo
