Re: One more question (different now)

2000-05-10 Thread Bernd Luevelsmeyer
David Malone wrote: On Thu, May 11, 2000 at 07:53:27AM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote: From the C99 draft (n869.txt): Is the C99 draft generally available, or where can you cough up cash to get a copy? The Standard itself is a book and can be bought as such in bookstores. Draft versions

Re: One more question (different now)

2000-05-10 Thread Doug Rabson
On Wed, 10 May 2000, Simon Shapiro wrote: On 10-May-00 Doug Rabson wrote: On Tue, 9 May 2000, Mike Smith wrote: On Tue, May 09, 2000 at 04:27:10PM -0700, Mike Smith wrote: The only answer I've seen for this one is to kick, hard, whoever it was that added -Wcast-qual to the

Re: One more question (different now)

2000-05-10 Thread Simon Shapiro
On 10-May-00 Doug Rabson wrote: On Tue, 9 May 2000, Mike Smith wrote: On Tue, May 09, 2000 at 04:27:10PM -0700, Mike Smith wrote: The only answer I've seen for this one is to kick, hard, whoever it was that added -Wcast-qual to the kernel options. Or we should just delete it

Re: One more question (different now)

2000-05-10 Thread Bruce Evans
On Tue, 9 May 2000, Garrett Wollman wrote: On Tue, 09 May 2000 19:08:21 -0400 (EDT), Simon Shapiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: So does: bzero((void *)trash, sizeof(junk_t)); So, how do I make everyone happy? Put a comment on that line indicating that a warning is expected.

Re: One more question (different now)

2000-05-10 Thread David Malone
On Thu, May 11, 2000 at 07:53:27AM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote: From the C99 draft (n869.txt): Is the C99 draft generally available, or where can you cough up cash to get a copy? David. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the

Re: One more question (different now)

2000-05-10 Thread Bruce Evans
On Wed, 10 May 2000, Doug Rabson wrote: On Wed, 10 May 2000, Simon Shapiro wrote: It actually worked! Now I will go and see what this uintptr_t actually is :-) Its an unsigned integer type which is the same size as a pointer (i.e. its safe to cast a pointer to uintptr_t without losing

ITS Brochure

2000-05-10 Thread marketing
Title: ITS Internet Site P.O.

Re: One more question (different now)

2000-05-10 Thread Doug Rabson
On Tue, 9 May 2000, Mike Smith wrote: On Tue, May 09, 2000 at 04:27:10PM -0700, Mike Smith wrote: The only answer I've seen for this one is to kick, hard, whoever it was that added -Wcast-qual to the kernel options. Or we should just delete it from the options. Ugh. I don't

Re: One more question (different now)

2000-05-10 Thread Bruce Evans
On Wed, 10 May 2000, Doug Rabson wrote: You can suppress the warning if you cast to uintptr_t first. Pretty ugly though. For (almost) full uglyness and correctness, you have to cast to "volatile void *" first, then back via "void *": #define unvolstructfoop(sfp) \ ((struct foo *)(void

Re: EVENTHANDLER_DECLARE

2000-05-10 Thread Simon Shapiro
On 10-May-00 Mike Smith wrote: ... This is dangerous for the OSM. When the i2o OSM shuts an IOP down, it is history. It will stop doing any work at all; network, disk, console, mouse, whatever. I reserve that for really, really shutdown/reset. I'm not sure I understand what you mean

It seems that SCSI code still use block devices

2000-05-10 Thread Andrey A. Chernov
Just got from recent kernel: Mounting root from ufs:/dev/da0s1a Device char-major=13 minor=131072 opened in block mode, convert to char mode with /dev/MAKEDEV before 2000-07-01 The suggestion is strange indeed, /dev/da0s1a ALREADY IS character device. It means that kernel mounting code itself

Re: It seems that SCSI code still use block devices

2000-05-10 Thread Nickolay Dudorov
In [EMAIL PROTECTED] Andrey A. Chernov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just got from recent kernel: Mounting root from ufs:/dev/da0s1a Device char-major=13 minor=131072 opened in block mode, convert to char mode with /dev/MAKEDEV before 2000-07-01 The suggestion is strange indeed, /dev/da0s1a

Re: a better idea for package dependencies

2000-05-10 Thread Nik Clayton
On Tue, May 09, 2000 at 10:29:12AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: Hopefully some day, parts of the /usr/src bits will be installed with the pkg_* utils, but today only things in /usr/ports are used with the pkg_* utils. ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/doc/packages/ :-) [ For those that

Re: EVENTHANDLER_DECLARE

2000-05-10 Thread Doug Rabson
On Tue, 9 May 2000, Mike Smith wrote: On 10-May-00 Mike Smith wrote: Sorry to bother y'll, but; Has anyone ever used that? I see no trace of any kernel code calling it, and the at_shutdown code appears to be gone. It's still used in the shutdown code; it was meant to

Re: unknown: PNP...

2000-05-10 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Wed, 10 May 2000 11:57:21 +0800, Trent Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Something else I've noticed in the mean time is that PnP devices like my printer - that are also on buses that are probed for PnP devices - end up being probed twice at boot time. Delete the `at isa? port blah'

Re: EVENTHANDLER_DECLARE

2000-05-10 Thread Mike Smith
This is dangerous for the OSM. When the i2o OSM shuts an IOP down, it is history. It will stop doing any work at all; network, disk, console, mouse, whatever. I reserve that for really, really shutdown/reset. I'm not sure I understand what you mean by "dangerous". When your