In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Assar Westerlund writes:
: The problem is that the source files are hidden in the kernel source
: directory and not installed. Where should vnode_if.{src,pl} get
: installed? It seems much simpler just to install vnode_if.h in
: /usr/include/sys. Patch appended.
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Assar Westerlund writes:
: I think it's wrong that vnode_if.h is not installed, this means that
: you need to have kernel source to compile any third-party file system.
:
: So I propose the patch below, to create vnode_if.h and then add it to CVS.
No. I don't like
On Sat, 24 Jun 2000, Alexander Sanda wrote:
> I'am ready to try another WM and see whether the SHM problems stay or not
> (other solutions didn't exactly work, I _dramatically_ increased all the
> SHM limits in the kernel but still get tons of shm errors from imlib or
> gdk). Yet, I still see
At 18:41 23.06.2000 -0400, Christopher Masto wrote:
> > BTW: It's for sure _not_ a -current issue and might have nothing to do
> > with FreeBSD at all, since I'am running 4.0-STABLE on this machine, with
> > Xfree 4.0 and Gnome 1.2.
>
>Which video card/driver are you using? (Mine is tdfx and s3v
On Fri, 23 Jun 2000, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
> At 4:00 PM -0400 6/23/00, Kelly Yancey wrote:
> >On Fri, 23 Jun 2000, Shawn Halpenny wrote:
> >
> > > I have not had any of the problems he's describing. I have never
> > > modified my shared memory settings in my kernel config either. If
> > > th
On Sat, Jun 24, 2000 at 12:29:56AM +0200, Alexander Sanda wrote:
> BTW: It's for sure _not_ a -current issue and might have nothing to do
> with FreeBSD at all, since I'am running 4.0-STABLE on this machine, with
> Xfree 4.0 and Gnome 1.2.
Which video card/driver are you using? (Mine is tdfx a
On Fri, 23 Jun 2000, Jacques A . Vidrine wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 23, 2000 at 08:22:00PM +0300, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> > Hmm, where my crystal ball... Aha, I see - probably you are using
> > Xfree 4.0, while your friend Xfree3.5*. It is where the problem lie
> > (see below).
>
> Well, I use XFree86
At 16:30 23.06.2000 -0400, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
>> > modified my shared memory settings in my kernel config either. If
>> > the problem is indeed Xfree 4.0, then I guess it must be a driver
>> > issue (I'm using the neomagic driver).
>>
>>You are running sawfish, and I'm willing to bet a not
On Fri, Jun 23, 2000 at 08:22:00PM +0300, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> Hmm, where my crystal ball... Aha, I see - probably you are using
> Xfree 4.0, while your friend Xfree3.5*. It is where the problem lie
> (see below).
Well, I use XFree86 4.0 with two displays, and GNOME 1.2, and I don't
have the ki
At 4:00 PM -0400 6/23/00, Kelly Yancey wrote:
>On Fri, 23 Jun 2000, Shawn Halpenny wrote:
>
> > I have not had any of the problems he's describing. I have never
> > modified my shared memory settings in my kernel config either. If
> > the problem is indeed Xfree 4.0, then I guess it must be a dr
Nick Hibma writes:
> Yes, the driver is here and it seems to work according to Mike Meyer
> (IIRC), he's fixed up a few other bits and pieces and I am ready to
> commit it, but I haven't had time to test it yet.
I've still got the problems I reported to the bsd-usb list, but I
suspect those are s
On Fri, 23 Jun 2000, Shawn Halpenny wrote:
>
> I have not had any of the problems he's describing. I have never modified
> my shared memory settings in my kernel config either. If the problem is
> indeed Xfree 4.0, then I guess it must be a driver issue (I'm using
> the neomagic driver).
>
On Fri, 23 Jun 2000, Christopher Masto wrote:
> Unfortunately, these are my current settings:
>
> options SHMALL=1025
> options SHMMAX="(SHMMAXPGS*PAGE_SIZE+1)"
> options SHMMAXPGS=1025
> options SHMMIN=2
> options SHMMNI=256
> options SHMSEG=128
>
On Fri, Jun 23, 2000 at 02:30:42PM -0400, Shawn Halpenny wrote:
> I have not had any of the problems he's describing. I have never modified
> my shared memory settings in my kernel config either. If the problem is
> indeed Xfree 4.0, then I guess it must be a driver issue (I'm using
> the neomag
On Fri, Jun 23, 2000 at 01:22:00PM EDT
> Christopher Masto wrote:
>
> > This is a plea for help.
> >
> > I used to have a problem with Gnome - it ate up all of my SysV shared
> > memory. My window manager (sawmill) 's title bars would come up blank
> > because of this. I eventualy found the "us
On 2000-06-23 09:41 -0700, Matthew Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Slight problem: We've run out of mount option flags.
But there already ist MNT_SOFTDEP in ...
#define MNT_SUIDDIR 0x0010 /* special handling of SUID on dirs */
#define MNT_SOFTDEP 0x0020 /* sof
On Fri, Jun 23, 2000 at 08:22:00PM +0300, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
>
> Hmm, where my crystal ball... Aha, I see - probably you are using
> Xfree 4.0, while your friend Xfree3.5*. It is where the problem lie
> (see below).
That is correct.
> "It has noting to do with kernel/gnome. XFree 4.0 is known
> > I can't find any local deltas in either of src/secure and src/crypto
> > which might influence this.
>
> Do you have "WITH_IDEA" set? I had to manually set CFLAGS+= -DNO_IDEA
> in secure/libssh, secure/ssh, secure/ssh-keygen, and secure/sshd's
> Makefile from about 6 hours ago or so.
The re
Christopher Masto wrote:
> This is a plea for help.
>
> I used to have a problem with Gnome - it ate up all of my SysV shared
> memory. My window manager (sawmill) 's title bars would come up blank
> because of this. I eventualy found the "use MIT-SHM" checkbox in the
> imlib settings and turne
This is a plea for help.
I used to have a problem with Gnome - it ate up all of my SysV shared
memory. My window manager (sawmill) 's title bars would come up blank
because of this. I eventualy found the "use MIT-SHM" checkbox in the
imlib settings and turned it off, and the problem mostly went
These simple changes make "test" and "expr" operate on 64 bit
integers (tested on i86 only, but I plan to test them on Alpha
next week).
Motivation:
I recently found a third party shell skript, which used "test"
to verify the (numeric) match of a checksum. The algorithm
worked on unsigned int
Doug Rabson wrote:
> --- Maxim Sobolev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi,
> >
> > I've just found that somebody ported linux agpgart module (used by
> > the GXL) to
> > FreeBSD. Could someone take a look at it and tell me whether it have
> > a chances
> > to be imported into base system or I should
On Fri, 23 Jun 2000 18:21:48 +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> Strange... I haven't anything modified in my local tree which could
> result in such behavior:
Too much is going on right now for any one success datapoint to convince
you that everything's fine. :-)
Check all the usual culprits
--- Maxim Sobolev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi,
>
> I've just found that somebody ported linux agpgart module (used by
> the GXL) to
> FreeBSD. Could someone take a look at it and tell me whether it have
> a chances
> to be imported into base system or I should create a port of it.
>
> http
:
:Right, but if mounting with -osoftdep, does what a "tunefs -n enable"
:does (and vice versa) fsck will have that knowledge and the tunefs
:step would be un-needed.
:
:--
:Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
Slight problem: We've run out of mount option flags.
On 23 Jun, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
>> Unfortunally I haven't seen someone else complain about this. Can some
>> reproduce this?
>
> Nope, I built an ata + atadisk + atapicd kernel today from sources dated
> 10H40 on 23 June 2000 without a problem.
Strange... I haven't anything modified in my local
> : > usb tty and modems aren't supported, as far as I know.
> :
> : They're "nearly" there, AFAIR. I sent Nick some code a while back that
> : addressed the last problem I understood he had.
>
> I'll have to ask him about it then.
Picked it up, looked at it, got distracted by Reality and mu
On Fri, 23 Jun 2000 16:31:51 +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
> Current sources as of 10H40 on 23 June 2000 build and install without
> problems [...]
GMT
Ciao,
Sheldon.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On Fri, 23 Jun 2000 16:34:12 +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
> Nope, I built an ata + atadisk + atapicd kernel today from sources dated
> 10H40 on 23 June 2000 without a problem.
GMT
Ciao,
Sheldon.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of
On Thu, 22 Jun 2000, Greg Lehey wrote:
> On Thursday, 22 June 2000 at 10:07:38 -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, Jun 19, 2000 at 05:34:47PM -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Ok, I have put up a web page that will track my efforts.
> >>>
> >>> http://apollo.backplane.com/
We've had a CDIOCEJECT ioctl `forever'. Several drivers support
it, such as cd, acd, and wfd. However, there are other drivers
that support removable media but do not support CDIOCEJECT: da
and sa.
Likewise we have CDIOCCLOSE which should cause a device to load
its media.
I want to add these i
[I think this thread belongs only on -current for the moment. Please
followup there.]
On Thu, Jun 22, 2000 at 01:44:47PM -0700, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote:
> For what it's worth, there's a port, ports/sysutils/eject, which is made
> to do this. I'm not one to deny a simple feature in the
On Fri, 23 Jun 2000 16:46:34 +0200, Neil Blakey-Milner wrote:
> Do you have "WITH_IDEA" set? I had to manually set CFLAGS+= -DNO_IDEA
> in secure/libssh, secure/ssh, secure/ssh-keygen, and secure/sshd's
> Makefile from about 6 hours ago or so.
I don't think so...
$ grep IDEA /etc/mak
On Fri 2000-06-23 (16:31), Sheldon Hearn wrote:
> Current sources as of 10H40 on 23 June 2000 build and install without
> problems (provided one pays attention to the new world order with
> respect to config(8)). The kernel boots and the system lives at least
> as long as it took me to type and s
Hello,
I had a pre-config-change kernel that picked up my PCM audio nicely
pcm0: at port
0x220-0x233,0x530-0x537,0x388-0x38f,0x330-0x333,0x538-0x539 irq 5 drq 1,0 on isa0
Today, with a post-config-change kernel, I don't detect it at boot.
Both kernel configs have the same pcm config line:
d
[Please send followups to -ports, where this belongs.]
On Fri, Jun 23, 2000 at 04:06:55PM +0200, Norbert Irmer wrote:
> I tried to build the wxGTK-2.1.16 port, and noticed that
> a few AC_CHECK(..) macros in the configure script
> don't work.
>
> The first header file which is not found is
>
>
Sorry, it should be:
/usr/include/X11 -> /usr/X11R6/include/X11
and
CONFIGURE_ENV= GTK_CONFIG="${X11BASE}/bin/gtk12-config"\
CCFLAGS="-I${X11BASE}/include"\
LDFLAGS="-L${X11BASE}/lib"
Norbert Irmer wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I tried to build the wxGTK-
"Daniel C. Sobral" wrote:
> "Jordan K. Hubbard" wrote:
> >
> > Everyone talks about using bitkeeper but none of the people who
> > recommend it have ever actually tried to use it for anything.
> > Before such recommendations will bear weight, this needs to
> > change. :)
>
> OCVS? (Or was it OVC
On Thu, 22 Jun 2000 16:34:13 +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> Unfortunally I haven't seen someone else complain about this. Can some
> reproduce this?
Nope, I built an ata + atadisk + atapicd kernel today from sources dated
10H40 on 23 June 2000 without a problem.
Ciao,
Sheldon.
To Unsub
On Fri, 23 Jun 2000 08:36:32 +0200, Mark Murray wrote:
> > Building world failed on my machine... (with USA_RESIDENT=NO)
> >
> > Does IDEA stuff compiled by default?
>
> I messed this up. Fix coming.
Current sources as of 10H40 on 23 June 2000 build and install without
problems (provided one
Hello,
I tried to build the wxGTK-2.1.16 port, and noticed that
a few AC_CHECK(..) macros in the configure script
don't work.
The first header file which is not found is
because on FreeBSD systems there is no link
/usr/include/X11 -> /usr/X11R6/include
(shouldn't there be such a link ?
hi, there!
On Fri, 23 Jun 2000, Dmitry Valdov wrote:
> There is a problem in ftp client in all FreeBSD versions. It isn't dangerous
> but probably should be fixed.
>
> > uname -a
> FreeBSD work.dv.ru 5.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #6: Thu Jun 22 19:41:50
> MSD 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/s
On Fri, 16 Jun 2000 20:34:06 -0400, Donn Miller wrote:
> I saw this as well. It turns out the optimizations I was using when
> building my kernel was causing it. I was using -march=pentium -Os
> -pipe. Falling back to -O -pipe solved this.
Clearly, the new warning about optimization in make
> Hi,
Oops - committed - thanks !
> ---snip---
> Index: 420.status-network
> ===
> RCS file: /big/FreeBSD-CVS/src/etc/periodic/daily/420.status-network,v
> retrieving revision 1.4
> diff -u -r1.4 420.status-network
> --- 420.status-
Hi!
There is a problem in ftp client in all FreeBSD versions. It isn't dangerous
but probably should be fixed.
> uname -a
FreeBSD work.dv.ru 5.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #6: Thu Jun 22 19:41:50
MSD 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/compile/WORK i386
> ftp localhost
Connected to localho
Hello!
I have a problem with normal exit all threads of task by signal...
At Linux, as i know, all threads of task receive a signal, but
under FreeBSD only one.
Any idea?
--
Rgdz,
Sergey Osokin aka oZZ,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.freebsd.org.ru/~osa/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PRO
> Using a non opensource commercial version control system is just
> to ask for bad carma, extended murphy fields and whatnot in an
> opensource volounteer project...
I would like to understand the discussed weakness of cvs regarding
branches.
Could someone explain it (in private) or point me to
Hi,
I've just found that somebody ported linux agpgart module (used by the GXL) to
FreeBSD. Could someone take a look at it and tell me whether it have a chances
to be imported into base system or I should create a port of it.
http://utah-glx.sourceforge.net/gart/agpgart-freebsd-2619.tar.gz
Hi,
---snip---
Index: 420.status-network
===
RCS file: /big/FreeBSD-CVS/src/etc/periodic/daily/420.status-network,v
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -r1.4 420.status-network
--- 420.status-network 2000/06/23 01:18:23 1.4
+++ 420.
Peter Wemm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> For the NetBSD version to work, what needs to happen is that the -osoftdep
> flag needs to be propagated to the superblock so that after reboot, fsck
> knows what to do. When it is next mounted, then update it to the new state.
>From what I can tell from
Thus spake Sheldon Hearn ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Personally, I'd prefer it if zero implied an unlimited number of
Yes. Fine, too.
> invokations per service per minute. However, the special case isn't
> really necessary, since you can simply specify some large number (and
> then prepare to have
On Fri, 23 Jun 2000, Peter Jeremy wrote:
...
> This has bitten a number of people who have turned softupdates on for
> their root filesystems - and had installworld die.
>
There is a workaround for this:
Before running installworld start a shellscript in background with:
while true; do; sync; s
On Thu 2000-06-22 (22:12), Kent Hauser wrote:
> For the last while (several months), whenever I try to build
> a RELENG_4 release from my -current box, it fails building gcc.
>
> As -current is supposed to be "fluid" for the next several months,
> I wanted to make a set of -current and -stable CD
On Thu, 08 Jun 2000 12:37:00 +0200, Alexander Langer wrote:
> What about that patch to let one use unlimited numbers of connections?
> The standard is still 256, but if one really wants that...
Personally, I'd prefer it if zero implied an unlimited number of
invokations per service per minute.
On Wed, 21 Jun 2000, Chuck Robey wrote:
>On Wed, 21 Jun 2000, Mark Murray wrote:
>
>> >Has anyone given any thought to what it would take to create an
>> > open source version of something similar to perforce? ;-)
>>
>> Clearly you have. :-). We await your submissions with baited breath...
Cyrille Lefevre wrote:
>
> well, at 4.x, FreeBSD sed doesn't support -E, is that GNU sed which support
> this option or 5.x FreeBSD sed ? for instance, GNU sed port doesn't exists !
Really? Funny. I'm not sure our sed is GNU sed. IIRC, it uses regex(3)
instead of gnuregex.
--
Daniel C. Sobral
56 matches
Mail list logo
