Cyrille Lefevre wrote:
>
> well, at 4.x, FreeBSD sed doesn't support -E, is that GNU sed which support
> this option or 5.x FreeBSD sed ? for instance, GNU sed port doesn't exists !
Really? Funny. I'm not sure our sed is GNU sed. IIRC, it uses regex(3)
instead of gnuregex.
--
Daniel C. Sobral
On Wed, 21 Jun 2000, Chuck Robey wrote:
>On Wed, 21 Jun 2000, Mark Murray wrote:
>
>> >Has anyone given any thought to what it would take to create an
>> > open source version of something similar to perforce? ;-)
>>
>> Clearly you have. :-). We await your submissions with baited breath...
On Thu, 08 Jun 2000 12:37:00 +0200, Alexander Langer wrote:
> What about that patch to let one use unlimited numbers of connections?
> The standard is still 256, but if one really wants that...
Personally, I'd prefer it if zero implied an unlimited number of
invokations per service per minute.
On Thu 2000-06-22 (22:12), Kent Hauser wrote:
> For the last while (several months), whenever I try to build
> a RELENG_4 release from my -current box, it fails building gcc.
>
> As -current is supposed to be "fluid" for the next several months,
> I wanted to make a set of -current and -stable CD
On Fri, 23 Jun 2000, Peter Jeremy wrote:
...
> This has bitten a number of people who have turned softupdates on for
> their root filesystems - and had installworld die.
>
There is a workaround for this:
Before running installworld start a shellscript in background with:
while true; do; sync; s
Thus spake Sheldon Hearn ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Personally, I'd prefer it if zero implied an unlimited number of
Yes. Fine, too.
> invokations per service per minute. However, the special case isn't
> really necessary, since you can simply specify some large number (and
> then prepare to have
Peter Wemm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> For the NetBSD version to work, what needs to happen is that the -osoftdep
> flag needs to be propagated to the superblock so that after reboot, fsck
> knows what to do. When it is next mounted, then update it to the new state.
>From what I can tell from
Hi,
---snip---
Index: 420.status-network
===
RCS file: /big/FreeBSD-CVS/src/etc/periodic/daily/420.status-network,v
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -r1.4 420.status-network
--- 420.status-network 2000/06/23 01:18:23 1.4
+++ 420.
Hi,
I've just found that somebody ported linux agpgart module (used by the GXL) to
FreeBSD. Could someone take a look at it and tell me whether it have a chances
to be imported into base system or I should create a port of it.
http://utah-glx.sourceforge.net/gart/agpgart-freebsd-2619.tar.gz
> Using a non opensource commercial version control system is just
> to ask for bad carma, extended murphy fields and whatnot in an
> opensource volounteer project...
I would like to understand the discussed weakness of cvs regarding
branches.
Could someone explain it (in private) or point me to
Hello!
I have a problem with normal exit all threads of task by signal...
At Linux, as i know, all threads of task receive a signal, but
under FreeBSD only one.
Any idea?
--
Rgdz,
Sergey Osokin aka oZZ,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.freebsd.org.ru/~osa/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PRO
Hi!
There is a problem in ftp client in all FreeBSD versions. It isn't dangerous
but probably should be fixed.
> uname -a
FreeBSD work.dv.ru 5.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #6: Thu Jun 22 19:41:50
MSD 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/compile/WORK i386
> ftp localhost
Connected to localho
> Hi,
Oops - committed - thanks !
> ---snip---
> Index: 420.status-network
> ===
> RCS file: /big/FreeBSD-CVS/src/etc/periodic/daily/420.status-network,v
> retrieving revision 1.4
> diff -u -r1.4 420.status-network
> --- 420.status-
On Fri, 16 Jun 2000 20:34:06 -0400, Donn Miller wrote:
> I saw this as well. It turns out the optimizations I was using when
> building my kernel was causing it. I was using -march=pentium -Os
> -pipe. Falling back to -O -pipe solved this.
Clearly, the new warning about optimization in make
hi, there!
On Fri, 23 Jun 2000, Dmitry Valdov wrote:
> There is a problem in ftp client in all FreeBSD versions. It isn't dangerous
> but probably should be fixed.
>
> > uname -a
> FreeBSD work.dv.ru 5.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #6: Thu Jun 22 19:41:50
> MSD 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/s
Hello,
I tried to build the wxGTK-2.1.16 port, and noticed that
a few AC_CHECK(..) macros in the configure script
don't work.
The first header file which is not found is
because on FreeBSD systems there is no link
/usr/include/X11 -> /usr/X11R6/include
(shouldn't there be such a link ?
On Fri, 23 Jun 2000 08:36:32 +0200, Mark Murray wrote:
> > Building world failed on my machine... (with USA_RESIDENT=NO)
> >
> > Does IDEA stuff compiled by default?
>
> I messed this up. Fix coming.
Current sources as of 10H40 on 23 June 2000 build and install without
problems (provided one
On Thu, 22 Jun 2000 16:34:13 +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> Unfortunally I haven't seen someone else complain about this. Can some
> reproduce this?
Nope, I built an ata + atadisk + atapicd kernel today from sources dated
10H40 on 23 June 2000 without a problem.
Ciao,
Sheldon.
To Unsub
"Daniel C. Sobral" wrote:
> "Jordan K. Hubbard" wrote:
> >
> > Everyone talks about using bitkeeper but none of the people who
> > recommend it have ever actually tried to use it for anything.
> > Before such recommendations will bear weight, this needs to
> > change. :)
>
> OCVS? (Or was it OVC
Sorry, it should be:
/usr/include/X11 -> /usr/X11R6/include/X11
and
CONFIGURE_ENV= GTK_CONFIG="${X11BASE}/bin/gtk12-config"\
CCFLAGS="-I${X11BASE}/include"\
LDFLAGS="-L${X11BASE}/lib"
Norbert Irmer wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I tried to build the wxGTK-
[Please send followups to -ports, where this belongs.]
On Fri, Jun 23, 2000 at 04:06:55PM +0200, Norbert Irmer wrote:
> I tried to build the wxGTK-2.1.16 port, and noticed that
> a few AC_CHECK(..) macros in the configure script
> don't work.
>
> The first header file which is not found is
>
>
Hello,
I had a pre-config-change kernel that picked up my PCM audio nicely
pcm0: at port
0x220-0x233,0x530-0x537,0x388-0x38f,0x330-0x333,0x538-0x539 irq 5 drq 1,0 on isa0
Today, with a post-config-change kernel, I don't detect it at boot.
Both kernel configs have the same pcm config line:
d
On Fri 2000-06-23 (16:31), Sheldon Hearn wrote:
> Current sources as of 10H40 on 23 June 2000 build and install without
> problems (provided one pays attention to the new world order with
> respect to config(8)). The kernel boots and the system lives at least
> as long as it took me to type and s
On Fri, 23 Jun 2000 16:46:34 +0200, Neil Blakey-Milner wrote:
> Do you have "WITH_IDEA" set? I had to manually set CFLAGS+= -DNO_IDEA
> in secure/libssh, secure/ssh, secure/ssh-keygen, and secure/sshd's
> Makefile from about 6 hours ago or so.
I don't think so...
$ grep IDEA /etc/mak
[I think this thread belongs only on -current for the moment. Please
followup there.]
On Thu, Jun 22, 2000 at 01:44:47PM -0700, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote:
> For what it's worth, there's a port, ports/sysutils/eject, which is made
> to do this. I'm not one to deny a simple feature in the
We've had a CDIOCEJECT ioctl `forever'. Several drivers support
it, such as cd, acd, and wfd. However, there are other drivers
that support removable media but do not support CDIOCEJECT: da
and sa.
Likewise we have CDIOCCLOSE which should cause a device to load
its media.
I want to add these i
On Thu, 22 Jun 2000, Greg Lehey wrote:
> On Thursday, 22 June 2000 at 10:07:38 -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, Jun 19, 2000 at 05:34:47PM -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Ok, I have put up a web page that will track my efforts.
> >>>
> >>> http://apollo.backplane.com/
On Fri, 23 Jun 2000 16:34:12 +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
> Nope, I built an ata + atadisk + atapicd kernel today from sources dated
> 10H40 on 23 June 2000 without a problem.
GMT
Ciao,
Sheldon.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of
On Fri, 23 Jun 2000 16:31:51 +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
> Current sources as of 10H40 on 23 June 2000 build and install without
> problems [...]
GMT
Ciao,
Sheldon.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
> : > usb tty and modems aren't supported, as far as I know.
> :
> : They're "nearly" there, AFAIR. I sent Nick some code a while back that
> : addressed the last problem I understood he had.
>
> I'll have to ask him about it then.
Picked it up, looked at it, got distracted by Reality and mu
On 23 Jun, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
>> Unfortunally I haven't seen someone else complain about this. Can some
>> reproduce this?
>
> Nope, I built an ata + atadisk + atapicd kernel today from sources dated
> 10H40 on 23 June 2000 without a problem.
Strange... I haven't anything modified in my local
:
:Right, but if mounting with -osoftdep, does what a "tunefs -n enable"
:does (and vice versa) fsck will have that knowledge and the tunefs
:step would be un-needed.
:
:--
:Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
Slight problem: We've run out of mount option flags.
--- Maxim Sobolev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi,
>
> I've just found that somebody ported linux agpgart module (used by
> the GXL) to
> FreeBSD. Could someone take a look at it and tell me whether it have
> a chances
> to be imported into base system or I should create a port of it.
>
> http
On Fri, 23 Jun 2000 18:21:48 +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> Strange... I haven't anything modified in my local tree which could
> result in such behavior:
Too much is going on right now for any one success datapoint to convince
you that everything's fine. :-)
Check all the usual culprits
Doug Rabson wrote:
> --- Maxim Sobolev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi,
> >
> > I've just found that somebody ported linux agpgart module (used by
> > the GXL) to
> > FreeBSD. Could someone take a look at it and tell me whether it have
> > a chances
> > to be imported into base system or I should
These simple changes make "test" and "expr" operate on 64 bit
integers (tested on i86 only, but I plan to test them on Alpha
next week).
Motivation:
I recently found a third party shell skript, which used "test"
to verify the (numeric) match of a checksum. The algorithm
worked on unsigned int
This is a plea for help.
I used to have a problem with Gnome - it ate up all of my SysV shared
memory. My window manager (sawmill) 's title bars would come up blank
because of this. I eventualy found the "use MIT-SHM" checkbox in the
imlib settings and turned it off, and the problem mostly went
Christopher Masto wrote:
> This is a plea for help.
>
> I used to have a problem with Gnome - it ate up all of my SysV shared
> memory. My window manager (sawmill) 's title bars would come up blank
> because of this. I eventualy found the "use MIT-SHM" checkbox in the
> imlib settings and turne
> > I can't find any local deltas in either of src/secure and src/crypto
> > which might influence this.
>
> Do you have "WITH_IDEA" set? I had to manually set CFLAGS+= -DNO_IDEA
> in secure/libssh, secure/ssh, secure/ssh-keygen, and secure/sshd's
> Makefile from about 6 hours ago or so.
The re
On Fri, Jun 23, 2000 at 08:22:00PM +0300, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
>
> Hmm, where my crystal ball... Aha, I see - probably you are using
> Xfree 4.0, while your friend Xfree3.5*. It is where the problem lie
> (see below).
That is correct.
> "It has noting to do with kernel/gnome. XFree 4.0 is known
On 2000-06-23 09:41 -0700, Matthew Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Slight problem: We've run out of mount option flags.
But there already ist MNT_SOFTDEP in ...
#define MNT_SUIDDIR 0x0010 /* special handling of SUID on dirs */
#define MNT_SOFTDEP 0x0020 /* sof
On Fri, Jun 23, 2000 at 01:22:00PM EDT
> Christopher Masto wrote:
>
> > This is a plea for help.
> >
> > I used to have a problem with Gnome - it ate up all of my SysV shared
> > memory. My window manager (sawmill) 's title bars would come up blank
> > because of this. I eventualy found the "us
On Fri, Jun 23, 2000 at 02:30:42PM -0400, Shawn Halpenny wrote:
> I have not had any of the problems he's describing. I have never modified
> my shared memory settings in my kernel config either. If the problem is
> indeed Xfree 4.0, then I guess it must be a driver issue (I'm using
> the neomag
On Fri, 23 Jun 2000, Christopher Masto wrote:
> Unfortunately, these are my current settings:
>
> options SHMALL=1025
> options SHMMAX="(SHMMAXPGS*PAGE_SIZE+1)"
> options SHMMAXPGS=1025
> options SHMMIN=2
> options SHMMNI=256
> options SHMSEG=128
>
On Fri, 23 Jun 2000, Shawn Halpenny wrote:
>
> I have not had any of the problems he's describing. I have never modified
> my shared memory settings in my kernel config either. If the problem is
> indeed Xfree 4.0, then I guess it must be a driver issue (I'm using
> the neomagic driver).
>
Nick Hibma writes:
> Yes, the driver is here and it seems to work according to Mike Meyer
> (IIRC), he's fixed up a few other bits and pieces and I am ready to
> commit it, but I haven't had time to test it yet.
I've still got the problems I reported to the bsd-usb list, but I
suspect those are s
At 4:00 PM -0400 6/23/00, Kelly Yancey wrote:
>On Fri, 23 Jun 2000, Shawn Halpenny wrote:
>
> > I have not had any of the problems he's describing. I have never
> > modified my shared memory settings in my kernel config either. If
> > the problem is indeed Xfree 4.0, then I guess it must be a dr
On Fri, Jun 23, 2000 at 08:22:00PM +0300, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> Hmm, where my crystal ball... Aha, I see - probably you are using
> Xfree 4.0, while your friend Xfree3.5*. It is where the problem lie
> (see below).
Well, I use XFree86 4.0 with two displays, and GNOME 1.2, and I don't
have the ki
At 16:30 23.06.2000 -0400, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
>> > modified my shared memory settings in my kernel config either. If
>> > the problem is indeed Xfree 4.0, then I guess it must be a driver
>> > issue (I'm using the neomagic driver).
>>
>>You are running sawfish, and I'm willing to bet a not
On Fri, 23 Jun 2000, Jacques A . Vidrine wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 23, 2000 at 08:22:00PM +0300, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> > Hmm, where my crystal ball... Aha, I see - probably you are using
> > Xfree 4.0, while your friend Xfree3.5*. It is where the problem lie
> > (see below).
>
> Well, I use XFree86
On Sat, Jun 24, 2000 at 12:29:56AM +0200, Alexander Sanda wrote:
> BTW: It's for sure _not_ a -current issue and might have nothing to do
> with FreeBSD at all, since I'am running 4.0-STABLE on this machine, with
> Xfree 4.0 and Gnome 1.2.
Which video card/driver are you using? (Mine is tdfx a
On Fri, 23 Jun 2000, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
> At 4:00 PM -0400 6/23/00, Kelly Yancey wrote:
> >On Fri, 23 Jun 2000, Shawn Halpenny wrote:
> >
> > > I have not had any of the problems he's describing. I have never
> > > modified my shared memory settings in my kernel config either. If
> > > th
At 18:41 23.06.2000 -0400, Christopher Masto wrote:
> > BTW: It's for sure _not_ a -current issue and might have nothing to do
> > with FreeBSD at all, since I'am running 4.0-STABLE on this machine, with
> > Xfree 4.0 and Gnome 1.2.
>
>Which video card/driver are you using? (Mine is tdfx and s3v
On Sat, 24 Jun 2000, Alexander Sanda wrote:
> I'am ready to try another WM and see whether the SHM problems stay or not
> (other solutions didn't exactly work, I _dramatically_ increased all the
> SHM limits in the kernel but still get tons of shm errors from imlib or
> gdk). Yet, I still see
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Assar Westerlund writes:
: I think it's wrong that vnode_if.h is not installed, this means that
: you need to have kernel source to compile any third-party file system.
:
: So I propose the patch below, to create vnode_if.h and then add it to CVS.
No. I don't like
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Assar Westerlund writes:
: The problem is that the source files are hidden in the kernel source
: directory and not installed. Where should vnode_if.{src,pl} get
: installed? It seems much simpler just to install vnode_if.h in
: /usr/include/sys. Patch appended.
56 matches
Mail list logo
